AB 201 — Registered sex offenders: local ordinances.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, requires persons convicted of specified sex offenses to register with local authorities for life while residing, located, attending school, or working in California. Existing law, as adopted by the voters by the passage of Proposition 83 at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, prohibits a person who is required to register as a sex offender from living in specified places, including within 2,000 feet of a school or park where children regularly gather. Existing law authorizes municipal jurisdictions to enact local ordinances that further restrict the residency of the registered sex offender. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for a person who is on parole for specified sex offenses to enter any park where children regularly gather without express permission from the person's parole agent. This bill would state that a local agency is not preempted by state law from enacting and enforcing an ordinance that restricts a registered sex offender from residing or being present at certain locations within the local agency's jurisdiction. The bill would authorize a local agency to adopt ordinances, rules, or regulations that are more restrictive than state law relating to a registered sex offender's ability to reside or be present at certain locations within the local agency's jurisdiction.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/21/15 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 21, 2015
- Introduced 01/29/15 - Introduced pdf January 29, 2015
- AB201 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Article IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Baker · Cosponsor
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Brough · Primary
- Chávez · Cosponsor
- Mike A. Gipson · Cosponsor
- Harper · Cosponsor
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Melendez · Cosponsor
- Nielsen · Cosponsor
- Obernolte · Cosponsor
- Olsen · Cosponsor
- Rodriguez · Cosponsor
- Steinorth · Cosponsor
- Vidak · Cosponsor
- Waldron · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 104 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Brough
Co-sponsors (17)
- Baker
- Bates
- Chávez
- Gipson, Mike A. Democratic
- Harper
- Huff
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Melendez
- Nielsen
- Obernolte
- Olsen
- Rodriguez
- Steinorth
- Vidak
- Waldron
- Wilk
- Mark Stone
Not signed on (104)
104 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 104 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 43% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Lopez | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 201 do?
- Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, requires persons convicted of specified sex offenses to register with local authorities for life while residing, located, attending school, or working in California. Existing law, as adopted by the voters by the passage of Proposition 83 at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, prohibits a person who is required to register as a sex offender from living in specified places, including within 2,000 feet of a school or park where children regularly gather. Existing law authorizes municipal jurisdictions to enact local ordinances that further restrict the residency of the registered sex offender. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for a person who is on parole for specified sex offenses to enter any park where children regularly gather without express permission from the person's parole agent. This bill would state that a local agency is not preempted by state law from enacting and enforcing an ordinance that restricts a registered sex offender from residing or being present at certain locations within the local agency's jurisdiction. The bill would authorize a local agency to adopt ordinances, rules, or regulations that are more restrictive than state law relating to a registered sex offender's ability to reside or be present at certain locations within the local agency's jurisdiction.
- Who sponsors AB 201?
- AB 201 is sponsored by Baker, Bates, Brough, Chávez, Gipson, Mike A. (Democratic), Harper, Huff, Lackey, Tom (Republican), Melendez, Nielsen, Obernolte, Olsen, Rodriguez, Steinorth, Vidak, Waldron, Wilk, and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of AB 201?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 201?
- Track AB 201 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 201
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 201
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →