California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 572 — School facilities: school district advisory committee: use or disposition of school buildings: school closures.

Last action — Died on file pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the governing board of any school district, and, prior to the sale, lease, or rental of any excess real property, except rentals not exceeding 30 days, requires the governing board of any school district, to appoint a school district advisory committee to advise the governing board of the school district in the development of districtwide policies and procedures governing the use or disposition of school buildings or space in school buildings which is not needed for school purposes. Existing law requires a school district advisory committee to consist of at least 7 but not more than 11 members, as provided, and specifies the duties of a school district advisory committee. This bill would require the governing board of a school district to also appoint a school district advisory committee before closing a school within the school district to advise the governing board of the school district regarding the closure of the school. If a school district advisory committee is created to advise the governing board of a school district regarding the closure of a school, the bill also would require the appointment of a cross section of community members, including pupil representatives, who have an interest in, and who may be affected by, the school closure to the school district advisory committee. The bill would require a school district advisory committee created for that purpose to be involved in the factfinding necessary for an informal recommendation regarding the school closure, as specified. By imposing additional duties on the governing board of a school district, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on file pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Pan.

  3. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1263.)

  4. Reconsideration granted.

  5. Motion to reconsider made by Senator Pan.

  6. Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 17. Noes 19. Page 1263.)

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1156.) (May 28).

  9. Set for hearing May 28.

  10. May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  11. Set for hearing May 11.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 647.) (April 15).

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  15. Set for hearing April 15.

  16. April 8 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  17. Set for hearing April 8.

  18. Referred to Com. on ED.

  19. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 29.

  20. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Pan · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Pan

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Failed 17 Yea · 19 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 151804
Democratic 2100
Total 171904
% of votes cast 43%48%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Nay
Hertzberg — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Pan — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wolk — Not Voting
Cannella — Nay
Glazer — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Nay
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
De León — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Allen — Nay
Huff — Nay
Runner — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Nay
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Not Voting
Roth — Nay
Wieckowski — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading SB572 Pan Reconsider

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37000
Democratic 3000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Bates — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Leno — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Pan — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5200
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Nay
Lara — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 572 do?
Existing law authorizes the governing board of any school district, and, prior to the sale, lease, or rental of any excess real property, except rentals not exceeding 30 days, requires the governing board of any school district, to appoint a school district advisory committee to advise the governing board of the school district in the development of districtwide policies and procedures governing the use or disposition of school buildings or space in school buildings which is not needed for school purposes. Existing law requires a school district advisory committee to consist of at least 7 but not more than 11 members, as provided, and specifies the duties of a school district advisory committee. This bill would require the governing board of a school district to also appoint a school district advisory committee before closing a school within the school district to advise the governing board of the school district regarding the closure of the school. If a school district advisory committee is created to advise the governing board of a school district regarding the closure of a school, the bill also would require the appointment of a cross section of community members, including pupil representatives, who have an interest in, and who may be affected by, the school closure to the school district advisory committee. The bill would require a school district advisory committee created for that purpose to be involved in the factfinding necessary for an informal recommendation regarding the school closure, as specified. By imposing additional duties on the governing board of a school district, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors SB 572?
SB 572 is sponsored by Pan.
What is the current status of SB 572?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 572?
Track SB 572 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 572

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 572

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →