Private postsecondary education: school closure bonds.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1916 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1916.
You're tracking AB 1916
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1916 — Private postsecondary education: school closure bonds.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009, provides for the regulation of private postsecondary educational institutions by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education in the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act exempts an institution from its provisions, if any of a list of specific criteria are met. The act establishes the Student Tuition Recovery Fund and requires the bureau to adopt regulations governing the administration and maintenance of the fund, including requirements relating to assessments on students and student claims against the fund, and establishes that the moneys in this fund are continuously appropriated to the bureau for specified purposes. This bill would require a private postsecondary institution, as defined, to file a surety bond before January 1, 2019, with the bureau in an amount no less than the total amount of tuition and fees charged by the institution for the immediately preceding academic year, divided by 4. In the event the institution ceases operation, this bill would require the bureau, if it makes a specified determination, to make a demand on the bond to provide recovery to students who were enrolled at the time of the closure, or within 120 days of the closure, and reimburse the Student Tuition Recovery Fund for moneys paid from the fund for these students.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/05/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 05, 2016
- Introduced 02/11/16 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2016
- AB1916 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and B. & P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jacqui Irwin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Irwin, Jacqui Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 44% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1916 do?
- Existing law, the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009, provides for the regulation of private postsecondary educational institutions by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education in the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act exempts an institution from its provisions, if any of a list of specific criteria are met. The act establishes the Student Tuition Recovery Fund and requires the bureau to adopt regulations governing the administration and maintenance of the fund, including requirements relating to assessments on students and student claims against the fund, and establishes that the moneys in this fund are continuously appropriated to the bureau for specified purposes. This bill would require a private postsecondary institution, as defined, to file a surety bond before January 1, 2019, with the bureau in an amount no less than the total amount of tuition and fees charged by the institution for the immediately preceding academic year, divided by 4. In the event the institution ceases operation, this bill would require the bureau, if it makes a specified determination, to make a demand on the bond to provide recovery to students who were enrolled at the time of the closure, or within 120 days of the closure, and reimburse the Student Tuition Recovery Fund for moneys paid from the fund for these students.
- Who sponsors AB 1916?
- AB 1916 is sponsored by Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1916?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1916?
- Track AB 1916 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1916
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1916
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →