California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 1877 — Lewd or obscene conduct.

Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Held without recommendation.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides that any person who exposes his or her person, or the private parts thereof, in a public place or in any place where there are present other persons to be offended or annoyed by that act is guilty of a misdemeanor, except as specified. A 2nd or subsequent conviction of that act, or a first conviction of that act after a prior conviction for a specified lewd or lascivious act, is a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison. This bill would instead make a first conviction of exposing oneself when it occurs in state prison or a county jail punishable as a felony in the state prison, and make a first conviction of that act after a prior conviction requiring registration as a sex offender punishable as a felony in the state prison. Because this bill would increase the penalties for an existing crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Held without recommendation.

  2. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  4. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  5. From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.

  6. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Linder · Primary
  • Mathis · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Linder

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Mathis

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1877 do?
Existing law provides that any person who exposes his or her person, or the private parts thereof, in a public place or in any place where there are present other persons to be offended or annoyed by that act is guilty of a misdemeanor, except as specified. A 2nd or subsequent conviction of that act, or a first conviction of that act after a prior conviction for a specified lewd or lascivious act, is a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison. This bill would instead make a first conviction of exposing oneself when it occurs in state prison or a county jail punishable as a felony in the state prison, and make a first conviction of that act after a prior conviction requiring registration as a sex offender punishable as a felony in the state prison. Because this bill would increase the penalties for an existing crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 1877?
AB 1877 is sponsored by Linder and Mathis.
What is the current status of AB 1877?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1877?
Track AB 1877 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1877

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1877

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →