Political Reform Act of 1974: employment restrictions.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2628 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2628.
You're tracking AB 2628
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2628 — Political Reform Act of 1974: employment restrictions.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Political Reform Act of 1974 generally prohibits a public official, as defined, from making, participating in making, or using his or her official position to influence a governmental decision in which the official has a financial interest. The act also requires the disclosure of specified financial interests of certain public officials on a statement of economic interests, which is filed annually. The act imposes certain restrictions on postgovernmental employment of specified public officials of state and local agencies. This bill would require each state agency and each local agency that maintains an Internet Web site to make publicly available on that Internet Web site the statements of economic interests filed by the specified public officials. This bill would prohibit an elected or appointed officer of a state or local agency, while holding office and for a period of one year after leaving office, from engaging in specified conduct, including maintaining employment with, as specified, or being a compensated consultant of that agency or, for compensation, aiding, advising, consulting with, or assisting an entity with a permit, regulatory action, or enforcement action pending before the agency. A violation of the act is punishable as a misdemeanor. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also impose a state-mandated local program by increasing the duties imposed on local officials. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/19/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 19, 2016
- Amended 04/06/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 06, 2016
- Amended 03/17/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 17, 2016
- Introduced 02/19/16 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2016
- AB2628 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Campos · Cosponsor
- Chau · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Chu · Cosponsor
- Eggman · Cosponsor
- Gomez · Cosponsor
- Levine · Primary
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- Mike McGuire · Cosponsor
- Nazarian · Cosponsor
- Thurmond · Cosponsor
- Weber · Cosponsor
- Williams · Cosponsor
- Wood · Cosponsor
- Corey A. Jackson · Cosponsor
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 16 co-sponsors · 105 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Levine
Co-sponsors (16)
- Campos
- Chau
- Chiu
- Chu
- Eggman
- Gomez
- McCarty
- McGuire, Mike Democratic
- Nazarian
- Thurmond
- Weber
- Williams
- Wood
- Jackson, Corey A. Democratic
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
Not signed on (105)
105 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 105 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2628 do?
- The Political Reform Act of 1974 generally prohibits a public official, as defined, from making, participating in making, or using his or her official position to influence a governmental decision in which the official has a financial interest. The act also requires the disclosure of specified financial interests of certain public officials on a statement of economic interests, which is filed annually. The act imposes certain restrictions on postgovernmental employment of specified public officials of state and local agencies. This bill would require each state agency and each local agency that maintains an Internet Web site to make publicly available on that Internet Web site the statements of economic interests filed by the specified public officials. This bill would prohibit an elected or appointed officer of a state or local agency, while holding office and for a period of one year after leaving office, from engaging in specified conduct, including maintaining employment with, as specified, or being a compensated consultant of that agency or, for compensation, aiding, advising, consulting with, or assisting an entity with a permit, regulatory action, or enforcement action pending before the agency. A violation of the act is punishable as a misdemeanor. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also impose a state-mandated local program by increasing the duties imposed on local officials. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
- Who sponsors AB 2628?
- AB 2628 is sponsored by Campos, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Eggman, Gomez, Levine, McCarty, McGuire, Mike (Democratic), Nazarian, Thurmond, Weber, Williams, Wood, Jackson, Corey A. (Democratic), Garcia, Robert (Democratic), and Bonta, Mia (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2628?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2628?
- Track AB 2628 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2628
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2628
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →