California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 1822 — California Sex Trade Buyer First Offender Program.

Last action — In committee: Held under submission.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to solicit or agree to engage in, or to engage in, an act of prostitution. A misdemeanor is generally punishable by not more than 6 months in a county jail, a fine not exceeding $1,000, or both that fine and imprisonment in a county jail. Existing law imposes additional penalties, including a higher fine, a longer term of imprisonment, or a suspension of the privilege to operate a motor vehicle, as specified, upon a person who is convicted of committing the crime, under certain circumstances. This bill would authorize the court, in addition to any other penalty imposed by law, to require a person who has been convicted of providing, or offering or attempting to provide, money or another thing of value, in exchange for an act of prostitution, to attend and successfully complete a sex trade buyer first offender program approved by the probation department, if an approved program is available. The bill would require the probation department in each county to design and implement an approval and renewal process for sex trade buyer first offender programs in accordance with the requirements of the bill. Among other requirements for these programs, the bill would require that these programs provide 6 to 8 hours of education for each participant, including information regarding the legal consequences of subsequent offenses, health education, and the effects of the sex trade on sellers of sex and on the community, as specified. The bill would also require the probation department to adopt and implement procedures for approving a new or existing program, and for revoking or suspending approval of an existing program, as specified. By imposing a new duty on county probation departments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Held under submission.

  2. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  6. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  7. From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.

  8. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Atkins · Cosponsor
  • Jacqui Irwin · Primary
  • Olsen · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Atkins
  • Olsen

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1822 do?
Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to solicit or agree to engage in, or to engage in, an act of prostitution. A misdemeanor is generally punishable by not more than 6 months in a county jail, a fine not exceeding $1,000, or both that fine and imprisonment in a county jail. Existing law imposes additional penalties, including a higher fine, a longer term of imprisonment, or a suspension of the privilege to operate a motor vehicle, as specified, upon a person who is convicted of committing the crime, under certain circumstances. This bill would authorize the court, in addition to any other penalty imposed by law, to require a person who has been convicted of providing, or offering or attempting to provide, money or another thing of value, in exchange for an act of prostitution, to attend and successfully complete a sex trade buyer first offender program approved by the probation department, if an approved program is available. The bill would require the probation department in each county to design and implement an approval and renewal process for sex trade buyer first offender programs in accordance with the requirements of the bill. Among other requirements for these programs, the bill would require that these programs provide 6 to 8 hours of education for each participant, including information regarding the legal consequences of subsequent offenses, health education, and the effects of the sex trade on sellers of sex and on the community, as specified. The bill would also require the probation department to adopt and implement procedures for approving a new or existing program, and for revoking or suspending approval of an existing program, as specified. By imposing a new duty on county probation departments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1822?
AB 1822 is sponsored by Atkins, Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic), and Olsen.
What is the current status of AB 1822?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1822?
Track AB 1822 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1822

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1822

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →