Net energy metering.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2339 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2339.
You're tracking AB 2339
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2339 — Net energy metering.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric utility, including electrical corporations and local publicly owned electric utilities, to develop a standard contract or tariff providing for net energy metering and to make this contract or tariff available to eligible customer-generators upon request for generation by a renewable electrical generation facility. Existing law provides that an electric utility that is not a large electrical corporation is not obligated to provide net energy metering when the combined total peak demand of all electricity used by eligible customer-generators in the service area exceeds 5% of the aggregate customer peak demand of the electric utility. This bill would define the "aggregate customer peak demand" for the purposes of calculating the net energy metering program limit for electric utilities that have more than 25,000 service connections, but are not large electrical corporations. The bill would dictate the manner of calculating aggregate customer peak demand if certain information is unavailable, as specified.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/18/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 18, 2016
- Introduced 02/18/16 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2016
- AB2339 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (April 13).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Testimony taken. Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jacqui Irwin · Primary
- Low · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Irwin, Jacqui Democratic
Co-sponsors (1)
- Low
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 13% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2339 do?
- Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric utility, including electrical corporations and local publicly owned electric utilities, to develop a standard contract or tariff providing for net energy metering and to make this contract or tariff available to eligible customer-generators upon request for generation by a renewable electrical generation facility. Existing law provides that an electric utility that is not a large electrical corporation is not obligated to provide net energy metering when the combined total peak demand of all electricity used by eligible customer-generators in the service area exceeds 5% of the aggregate customer peak demand of the electric utility. This bill would define the "aggregate customer peak demand" for the purposes of calculating the net energy metering program limit for electric utilities that have more than 25,000 service connections, but are not large electrical corporations. The bill would dictate the manner of calculating aggregate customer peak demand if certain information is unavailable, as specified.
- Who sponsors AB 2339?
- AB 2339 is sponsored by Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic) and Low.
- What is the current status of AB 2339?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2339?
- Track AB 2339 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2339
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2339
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →