California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 585 — Insurance payments: interception.

Last action — July 8 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law creates the Department of Child Support Services and provides for the interception of funds from state tax refunds, lottery winnings, unemployment compensation benefits, and benefits under the Public Employees' Retirement System that otherwise would be paid to a person owing past due child support. Existing law creates the Department of Insurance, headed by the Insurance Commissioner, and prescribes the department's powers and duties. This bill would, beginning July 1, 2016, create the Insurance Payment Intercept Program within the Department of Insurance. The bill would require the Department of Child Support Services to facilitate a data match system using automated data exchanges through which an insurer or self-insurer would be required to report, prior to the payment of a claim, the name, address, and, if known, date of birth and social security number or other taxpayer identification number for each claimant to match a claimant who owes past due support, as specified. This bill would require the commissioner, if he or she has good cause to believe that an insurer or self-insurer has not complied with the bill's requirements, to give written notice of the alleged noncompliance specifying a reasonable time, not less than 30 days, during which the insurer or self-insurer is required to correct the noncompliance. The bill would require the commissioner to impose a fine, not to exceed $1,000, for each violation if an insurer or self-insurer fails to correct the noncompliance within the specified timeframe, and to issue an order requiring the violator to comply with that requirement. The bill would authorize an insurer or self-insurer who disagrees with the commissioner's determination of noncompliance to request an administrative hearing within 30 days of receipt of the notice of noncompliance. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. July 8 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  3. Referred to Com. on INS.

  4. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 4. Page 1120.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  8. Set for hearing May 26.

  9. May 18 hearing postponed by committee.

  10. Set for hearing May 18.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 819.) (April 28).

  13. Set for hearing April 28.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  15. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 525.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  16. Set for hearing April 8.

  17. Referred to Coms. on INS. and JUD.

  18. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 29.

  19. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Leyva · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Leyva

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Passed 29 Yea · 4 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27406
Democratic 2001
Total 29407
% of votes cast 73%10%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Glazer — Yea
De León — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Mitchell — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 585 do?
Existing law creates the Department of Child Support Services and provides for the interception of funds from state tax refunds, lottery winnings, unemployment compensation benefits, and benefits under the Public Employees' Retirement System that otherwise would be paid to a person owing past due child support. Existing law creates the Department of Insurance, headed by the Insurance Commissioner, and prescribes the department's powers and duties. This bill would, beginning July 1, 2016, create the Insurance Payment Intercept Program within the Department of Insurance. The bill would require the Department of Child Support Services to facilitate a data match system using automated data exchanges through which an insurer or self-insurer would be required to report, prior to the payment of a claim, the name, address, and, if known, date of birth and social security number or other taxpayer identification number for each claimant to match a claimant who owes past due support, as specified. This bill would require the commissioner, if he or she has good cause to believe that an insurer or self-insurer has not complied with the bill's requirements, to give written notice of the alleged noncompliance specifying a reasonable time, not less than 30 days, during which the insurer or self-insurer is required to correct the noncompliance. The bill would require the commissioner to impose a fine, not to exceed $1,000, for each violation if an insurer or self-insurer fails to correct the noncompliance within the specified timeframe, and to issue an order requiring the violator to comply with that requirement. The bill would authorize an insurer or self-insurer who disagrees with the commissioner's determination of noncompliance to request an administrative hearing within 30 days of receipt of the notice of noncompliance. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Who sponsors SB 585?
SB 585 is sponsored by Leyva.
What is the current status of SB 585?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 585?
Track SB 585 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 585

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 585

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →