Health care districts: dissolution.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2471 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2471.
You're tracking AB 2471
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2471 — Health care districts: dissolution.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Hancock.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, provides the authority and procedures for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization and reorganization of cities and districts by local agency formation commissions. Existing law establishes the procedures for the dissolution of the existence of a district and sets forth provisions for winding up the affairs of a dissolved district, as specified. Existing law generally authorizes the dissolution of a district without voter approval, except as specified. Notwithstanding those provisions, existing law subjects the dissolution of a health care district to voter approval. This bill would require the Alameda County local agency formation commission to order the dissolution of the Eden Township Healthcare District if that health care district meets certain criteria, as specified. The bill would subject a dissolution under these provisions to specified provisions of the act that require dissolution by voter approval only if a majority protest exists, as specified. By requiring a higher level of service from the Alameda County local agency formation commission to analyze the criteria described above, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Eden Township Healthcare District in Alameda County. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/01/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 01, 2016
- Amended 05/10/16 - Amended Assembly pdf May 10, 2016
- Introduced 02/19/16 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2016
- AB2471 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Hancock.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 4783.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 4).
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Quirk · Primary
- Mia Bonta · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Quirk
Co-sponsors (1)
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 14% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 60 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 69 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Atkins | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2471 do?
- Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, provides the authority and procedures for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization and reorganization of cities and districts by local agency formation commissions. Existing law establishes the procedures for the dissolution of the existence of a district and sets forth provisions for winding up the affairs of a dissolved district, as specified. Existing law generally authorizes the dissolution of a district without voter approval, except as specified. Notwithstanding those provisions, existing law subjects the dissolution of a health care district to voter approval. This bill would require the Alameda County local agency formation commission to order the dissolution of the Eden Township Healthcare District if that health care district meets certain criteria, as specified. The bill would subject a dissolution under these provisions to specified provisions of the act that require dissolution by voter approval only if a majority protest exists, as specified. By requiring a higher level of service from the Alameda County local agency formation commission to analyze the criteria described above, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Eden Township Healthcare District in Alameda County. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 2471?
- AB 2471 is sponsored by Quirk and Bonta, Mia (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2471?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2471?
- Track AB 2471 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2471
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2471
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →