California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: To Executive

AB 2588 — Independent insurance adjusters.

Last action — Vetoed by Governor.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Insurance Adjuster Act, sets forth various requirements with respect to operation as an insurance adjuster in this state, including, but not limited to, that the person be licensed, licensing qualifications and application requirements, continuing education and reporting requirements, codes of conduct, disciplinary actions, and nonresident and emergency licenses. The act defines the term "insurance adjuster" to include a person, other than a private investigator, who, for any consideration whatsoever, engages in business or accepts employment to furnish, or agrees to make, or makes, any investigation for the purpose of obtaining, information in the course of adjusting or otherwise participating in the disposal of, any claim under or in connection with a policy of insurance on behalf of an insurer or engages in soliciting insurance adjustment business. Any person who knowingly falsifies the fingerprints or photographs submitted as part of the application process is guilty of a felony, and any person who violates any other provision governing insurance adjusters is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $500, or by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Existing law prescribes a schedule for various insurance adjuster application, license, and license renewal fees. This bill would revise and recast the above provisions by, among other things, changing the name of the act to the Independent Insurance Adjuster Act and redefining an "independent insurance adjuster" to mean an individual, a business entity, an independent contractor, or an employee of a contractor who contracts for compensation with insurers, a person whose tax treatment by the insurers is consistent with that of an independent contractor rather than as an employee, and a person who investigates, negotiates, or settles property and casualty claims for insurers. The bill would expand the categories of persons exempt from the act to include, among others, an individual who is employed to investigate suspected fraudulent insurance claims but who does not adjust losses or determine claims payments, and a person who solely performs administrative or clerical duties, or any combination thereof, and who does not investigate, negotiate, or settle claims with policyholders, claimants, or their legal representatives. The bill would impose additional information and educational requirements on applicants and would impose additional administrative and code of conduct requirements on licensees. The bill would require a person who fails to meet continuing education and reporting requirements, and who has not been granted an extension of time by the commissioner to comply, to have his or her license placed on inactive status, as specified, and would prohibit a licensee on inactive status from performing specified activities. The bill would revise the provisions relating to nonresident and emergency licenses with regards to qualifying for those licenses. The bill would also create an apprentice independent insurance adjuster license to facilitate the experience, education, and training necessary to ensure reasonable competency in the responsibilities and duties of an independent insurance adjuster and would set forth the various terms and conditions of the license, including an application fee to be fixed at up to $80. The bill would make an apprentice independent insurance adjuster subject to a felony conviction if he or she knowingly falsifies the fingerprints or photograph submitted as part of his or her application for a license. The bill would impose a 3-year reporting requirement on the Department of Insurance. The bill would also make conforming changes. Because the bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also change various independent insurance adjuster application, license, and renewal fees, as prescribed. This bill also would incorporate additional changes in Sections 1722 and 1751.5 of the Insurance Code proposed by SB 488, to be operative if SB 488 and this bill are both enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor.

  2. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12 p.m.

  3. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 50. Noes 29. Page 6382.).

  4. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 5275.).

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).

  10. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on INS.

  14. Referred to Com. on INS.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 29. Page 5199.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  19. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 27).

  20. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  23. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  26. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on INS. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  27. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  28. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  29. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  30. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  31. Read first time.

  32. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  33. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chu · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Chu

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 50 Yea · 29 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452401
Democratic 5000
Republican 0500
Total 502901
% of votes cast 63%36%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Wood — Yea
Burke — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Low — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Levine — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gray — Nay
Gatto — Nay
Chang — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Hadley — Nay
Harper — Nay
Baker — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Kim — Nay
Linder — Nay
Mayes — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Quirk — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Frazier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 13 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231201
Democratic 2100
Total 251301
% of votes cast 64%33%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Liu — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Bates — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 50 Yea · 29 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452401
Democratic 5000
Republican 0500
Total 502901
% of votes cast 63%36%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Quirk — Not Voting
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Medina — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Harper — Nay
Holden — Yea
Kim — Nay
Levine — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Linder — Nay
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Burke — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Gray — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Campos — Yea
Baker — Nay
Chang — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Wood — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hadley — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 14 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12400
Democratic 2000
Republican 0200
Total 14600
% of votes cast 70%30%0%0%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Holden — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Chang — Nay
Bonilla — Yea
Daly — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8300
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 9400
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Rodriguez — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9001
Republican 0001
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Brough — Yea
Chang — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Holden — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2588 do?
Existing law, the Insurance Adjuster Act, sets forth various requirements with respect to operation as an insurance adjuster in this state, including, but not limited to, that the person be licensed, licensing qualifications and application requirements, continuing education and reporting requirements, codes of conduct, disciplinary actions, and nonresident and emergency licenses. The act defines the term "insurance adjuster" to include a person, other than a private investigator, who, for any consideration whatsoever, engages in business or accepts employment to furnish, or agrees to make, or makes, any investigation for the purpose of obtaining, information in the course of adjusting or otherwise participating in the disposal of, any claim under or in connection with a policy of insurance on behalf of an insurer or engages in soliciting insurance adjustment business. Any person who knowingly falsifies the fingerprints or photographs submitted as part of the application process is guilty of a felony, and any person who violates any other provision governing insurance adjusters is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $500, or by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Existing law prescribes a schedule for various insurance adjuster application, license, and license renewal fees. This bill would revise and recast the above provisions by, among other things, changing the name of the act to the Independent Insurance Adjuster Act and redefining an "independent insurance adjuster" to mean an individual, a business entity, an independent contractor, or an employee of a contractor who contracts for compensation with insurers, a person whose tax treatment by the insurers is consistent with that of an independent contractor rather than as an employee, and a person who investigates, negotiates, or settles property and casualty claims for insurers. The bill would expand the categories of persons exempt from the act to include, among others, an individual who is employed to investigate suspected fraudulent insurance claims but who does not adjust losses or determine claims payments, and a person who solely performs administrative or clerical duties, or any combination thereof, and who does not investigate, negotiate, or settle claims with policyholders, claimants, or their legal representatives. The bill would impose additional information and educational requirements on applicants and would impose additional administrative and code of conduct requirements on licensees. The bill would require a person who fails to meet continuing education and reporting requirements, and who has not been granted an extension of time by the commissioner to comply, to have his or her license placed on inactive status, as specified, and would prohibit a licensee on inactive status from performing specified activities. The bill would revise the provisions relating to nonresident and emergency licenses with regards to qualifying for those licenses. The bill would also create an apprentice independent insurance adjuster license to facilitate the experience, education, and training necessary to ensure reasonable competency in the responsibilities and duties of an independent insurance adjuster and would set forth the various terms and conditions of the license, including an application fee to be fixed at up to $80. The bill would make an apprentice independent insurance adjuster subject to a felony conviction if he or she knowingly falsifies the fingerprints or photograph submitted as part of his or her application for a license. The bill would impose a 3-year reporting requirement on the Department of Insurance. The bill would also make conforming changes. Because the bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also change various independent insurance adjuster application, license, and renewal fees, as prescribed. This bill also would incorporate additional changes in Sections 1722 and 1751.5 of the Insurance Code proposed by SB 488, to be operative if SB 488 and this bill are both enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2588?
AB 2588 is sponsored by Chu.
What is the current status of AB 2588?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2588?
Track AB 2588 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2588

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2588

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →