Transcript Reimbursement Fund: renewal.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1522 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1522.
You're tracking AB 1522
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1522 — Transcript Reimbursement Fund: renewal.
Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of shorthand reporters by the Court Reporters Board of California within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires, until January 1, 2017, certain fees and revenues collected by the board from licensees to be deposited into the Transcript Reimbursement Fund to be available to provide reimbursement for the cost of providing shorthand reporting services to low-income litigants in civil cases. Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2017, low-income persons appearing pro se to apply for funds from the Transcript Reimbursement Fund, subject to specified requirements and limitations. Existing law requires the board, until January 1, 2017, to publicize the availability of the fund to prospective applicants. Existing law requires the unencumbered funds remaining in the Transcript Reimbursement Fund as of January 1, 2017, to be transferred to the Court Reporters' Fund. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2021. By extending the operation of the Transcript Reimbursement Fund, which is a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/23/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 23, 2016
- Introduced 03/10/15 - Introduced pdf March 10, 2015
- AB1522 View text html
Action History
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 52. Noes 19. Page 974.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 14).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee April 10.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Judiciary · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Judiciary
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 14 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 52 | 19 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 24% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1522 do?
- Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of shorthand reporters by the Court Reporters Board of California within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires, until January 1, 2017, certain fees and revenues collected by the board from licensees to be deposited into the Transcript Reimbursement Fund to be available to provide reimbursement for the cost of providing shorthand reporting services to low-income litigants in civil cases. Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2017, low-income persons appearing pro se to apply for funds from the Transcript Reimbursement Fund, subject to specified requirements and limitations. Existing law requires the board, until January 1, 2017, to publicize the availability of the fund to prospective applicants. Existing law requires the unencumbered funds remaining in the Transcript Reimbursement Fund as of January 1, 2017, to be transferred to the Court Reporters' Fund. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2021. By extending the operation of the Transcript Reimbursement Fund, which is a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1522?
- AB 1522 is sponsored by Committee on Judiciary.
- What is the current status of AB 1522?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1522?
- Track AB 1522 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1522
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1522
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →