Alcoholic beverage control: tied-house restrictions: compensation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1426 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1426.
You're tracking SB 1426
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1426 — Alcoholic beverage control: tied-house restrictions: compensation.
Last action — June 30 hearing postponed by committee.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law generally restricts certain alcoholic beverage licensees from paying, crediting, or compensating a retailer for advertising in connection with the advertising and sale of alcoholic beverages and expressly authorizes exceptions to this prohibition. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2022, a person, as defined, who has an ownership interest in an on-sale retail license, subject to a numerical limitation, to be compensated by an authorized licensee, as defined, for promotional or marketing services of the authorized licensee's products subject to specified conditions, including that the compensation be based solely on the promotional and marketing activities. The bill would create several new crimes, including that an authorized licensee who, through coercion or other illegal means, induces the holder of a wholesaler's license to provide compensation pursuant to these provisions guilty of a misdemeanor. The bill would additionally make an authorized licensee or a person who violates these provisions guilty of a misdemeanor. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/31/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 31, 2016
- Introduced 02/19/16 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2016
- SB1426 View text html
Action History
-
June 30 hearing postponed by committee.
-
June 22 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 4. Page 4110.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 4010.) (May 27).
-
Set for hearing May 27.
-
May 2 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 2.
-
April 25 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 25.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3494.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 12.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- De León · Cosponsor
- Hall · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hall
Co-sponsors (1)
- De León
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 10% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 0% | 0% | 38% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1426 do?
- Existing law generally restricts certain alcoholic beverage licensees from paying, crediting, or compensating a retailer for advertising in connection with the advertising and sale of alcoholic beverages and expressly authorizes exceptions to this prohibition. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2022, a person, as defined, who has an ownership interest in an on-sale retail license, subject to a numerical limitation, to be compensated by an authorized licensee, as defined, for promotional or marketing services of the authorized licensee's products subject to specified conditions, including that the compensation be based solely on the promotional and marketing activities. The bill would create several new crimes, including that an authorized licensee who, through coercion or other illegal means, induces the holder of a wholesaler's license to provide compensation pursuant to these provisions guilty of a misdemeanor. The bill would additionally make an authorized licensee or a person who violates these provisions guilty of a misdemeanor. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1426?
- SB 1426 is sponsored by De León and Hall.
- What is the current status of SB 1426?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1426?
- Track SB 1426 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1426
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1426
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →