SB 239 — Local services: contracts: fire protection services.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 763, Statutes of 2015.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law prescribes generally the powers and duties of the local agency formation commission in each county with respect to the review approval or disapproval of proposals for changes of organization or reorganization of cities and special districts within that county. Existing law permits a city or district to provide extended services, as defined, outside its jurisdictional boundaries only if it first requests and receives written approval from the local agency formation commission in the affected county. Under existing law, the commission may authorize a city or district to provide new or extended services outside both its jurisdictional boundaries and its sphere of influence under specified circumstances. This bill would, with certain exceptions, permit a public agency to exercise new or extended services outside the public agency's jurisdictional boundaries pursuant to a fire protection contract, as defined, only if the public agency receives written approval from the local agency formation commission in the affected county. The bill would require that the legislative body of a public agency that is not a state agency adopt a resolution of application and submit the resolution along with a plan for services, as provided, that a proposal by a state agency be initiated by the director of the agency with the approval of the Director of Finance, and that a proposal by a local agency that is currently under contract for the provision of fire protection services be initiated by the local agency and approved by the Director of Finance. The bill would require, prior to adopting the resolution or submitting the proposal, the public agency to enter into a written agreement for the performance of new or extended services pursuant to a fire protection contract with, or provide written notice of a proposed fire protection contract to, each affected public agency and recognized employee organization representing firefighters in the affected area, and to conduct a public hearing on the resolution. The bill would require the commission to approve or disapprove the proposal as specified. The bill would require the commission to consider, among other things, a comprehensive fiscal analysis prepared by the executive officer in accordance with specified requirements. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 56133 of the Government Code proposed by AB 402 that would become operative if this bill and AB 402 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/10/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 10, 2015
- Enrolled 09/10/15 - Enrolled pdf September 10, 2015
- Amended 09/02/15 - Amended Assembly pdf September 02, 2015
- Amended 08/31/15 - Amended Assembly pdf August 31, 2015
- Amended 06/01/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 01, 2015
- Amended 04/23/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 23, 2015
- Amended 03/23/15 - Amended Senate pdf March 23, 2015
- Introduced 02/17/15 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2015
- SB239 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 763, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10:45 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 2672.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 54. Noes 23. Page 2971.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (August 27).
-
August 19 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 1250.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1150.) (May 28).
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
May 18 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 815.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Set for hearing April 29.
-
April 15 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 15.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hertzberg · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hertzberg
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 13 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 13 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 33% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 18 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 23 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 29% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 30% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 239 do?
- Existing law prescribes generally the powers and duties of the local agency formation commission in each county with respect to the review approval or disapproval of proposals for changes of organization or reorganization of cities and special districts within that county. Existing law permits a city or district to provide extended services, as defined, outside its jurisdictional boundaries only if it first requests and receives written approval from the local agency formation commission in the affected county. Under existing law, the commission may authorize a city or district to provide new or extended services outside both its jurisdictional boundaries and its sphere of influence under specified circumstances. This bill would, with certain exceptions, permit a public agency to exercise new or extended services outside the public agency's jurisdictional boundaries pursuant to a fire protection contract, as defined, only if the public agency receives written approval from the local agency formation commission in the affected county. The bill would require that the legislative body of a public agency that is not a state agency adopt a resolution of application and submit the resolution along with a plan for services, as provided, that a proposal by a state agency be initiated by the director of the agency with the approval of the Director of Finance, and that a proposal by a local agency that is currently under contract for the provision of fire protection services be initiated by the local agency and approved by the Director of Finance. The bill would require, prior to adopting the resolution or submitting the proposal, the public agency to enter into a written agreement for the performance of new or extended services pursuant to a fire protection contract with, or provide written notice of a proposed fire protection contract to, each affected public agency and recognized employee organization representing firefighters in the affected area, and to conduct a public hearing on the resolution. The bill would require the commission to approve or disapprove the proposal as specified. The bill would require the commission to consider, among other things, a comprehensive fiscal analysis prepared by the executive officer in accordance with specified requirements. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 56133 of the Government Code proposed by AB 402 that would become operative if this bill and AB 402 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last.
- Who sponsors SB 239?
- SB 239 is sponsored by Hertzberg.
- What is the current status of SB 239?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 239?
- Track SB 239 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 239
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 239
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →