AB 958 — Agriculture: California Avocado Commission: California Salmon Council.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 307, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the California Avocado Commission, which is charged with, among other duties, promoting the sale of avocados by advertising and other promotional means for the purpose of maintaining and expanding present markets and creating new and larger intrastate, interstate, and foreign markets for avocados. Existing law requires the commission to establish 5 districts within the state, each representing approximately 20% of the avocado production in California, and, beginning in the 2000–01 marketing season, requires those districts to be reapportioned every 5th year in accordance with certain procedures. Under existing law, the commission consists of 10 avocado producers who are not handlers, 2 elected from each of the 5 districts, 4 avocado handlers who are elected on a statewide basis, one public member who is appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, and the secretary who serves as a nonvoting ex officio member. Existing law also provides for an alternate member for each member of the commission, except the secretary, to be elected in the same manner as the member. This bill would instead require the commission to establish no fewer than 3 districts and no more than 5 districts within the state, each representing approximately the same percentage of avocado production in California, and would require those districts to be represented by a specified number of producers who are not handlers according to the number of districts the commission establishes. The bill would require the districts to be reapportioned every 5th year in accordance with redistricting procedures adopted by a two-thirds vote of the commission and concurred in by the secretary. The bill would provide for an alternate member for each district instead of providing an alternate member for each producer member of the commission. The bill would provide for 2 alternate handler members and for each alternate handler member to be assigned to serve as an alternate to two handler members, as specified, instead of providing an alternate handler member for each handler member of the commission. The bill would make conforming and other related changes. (2) Existing law, the California Salmon Marketing and Development Act, creates the California Salmon Council, consisting of 9 voting members, appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, and 5 nonvoting members, as provided. Under existing law, the council is required to provide advice and investigations for, and perform duties delegated to it by, the secretary, including programs to promote education, research, and public information regarding the consumption of salmon and salmon products. Existing law provides for referendum voting by commercial salmon vessel operators, as defined, to determine whether the act should be implemented and, periodically, to review whether the operation of the act and the council should be continued. Upon approval of the referendum, existing law requires fishermen to pay specified assessments to the secretary and requires the secretary to expend and invest those moneys for purposes of the act. A violation of the act is a misdemeanor. This bill would change the composition of the council to include 3 nonvoting members and would make various changes to the requirements covering commercial salmon fishing, with regard to notification of the adopted regulations by the secretary. The bill would require the secretary to establish a list of handlers, defined to include processors, receivers, and wholesalers, and would provide for referendum voting by those handlers to determine whether they shall be subject to the act. Upon approval of the referendum, the bill would change the composition of the council to include 11 voting members appointed by the secretary. Upon approval of the referendum, the bill would require fishermen who sell salmon to the ultimate consumer and handlers to pay specified assessments to the secretary and would require the secretary to expend and invest those moneys for purposes of the act, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would include handlers, if subject to the act, in the periodic referenda to determine whether the operation of the act and the council should be continued and would make other conforming changes. By authorizing handlers to be subject to the requirements of the act, the violation of which is a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/21/15 - Chaptered Current pdf September 21, 2015
- Enrolled 08/26/15 - Enrolled pdf August 26, 2015
- Amended 06/29/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 29, 2015
- Amended 05/18/15 - Amended Assembly pdf May 18, 2015
- Amended 05/04/15 - Amended Assembly pdf May 04, 2015
- Amended 04/22/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2015
- Introduced 02/26/15 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2015
- AB958 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 307, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2559.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2118.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1565.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Agriculture · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Agriculture
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 74 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Not Voting |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 958 do?
- (1) Existing law establishes the California Avocado Commission, which is charged with, among other duties, promoting the sale of avocados by advertising and other promotional means for the purpose of maintaining and expanding present markets and creating new and larger intrastate, interstate, and foreign markets for avocados. Existing law requires the commission to establish 5 districts within the state, each representing approximately 20% of the avocado production in California, and, beginning in the 2000–01 marketing season, requires those districts to be reapportioned every 5th year in accordance with certain procedures. Under existing law, the commission consists of 10 avocado producers who are not handlers, 2 elected from each of the 5 districts, 4 avocado handlers who are elected on a statewide basis, one public member who is appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, and the secretary who serves as a nonvoting ex officio member. Existing law also provides for an alternate member for each member of the commission, except the secretary, to be elected in the same manner as the member. This bill would instead require the commission to establish no fewer than 3 districts and no more than 5 districts within the state, each representing approximately the same percentage of avocado production in California, and would require those districts to be represented by a specified number of producers who are not handlers according to the number of districts the commission establishes. The bill would require the districts to be reapportioned every 5th year in accordance with redistricting procedures adopted by a two-thirds vote of the commission and concurred in by the secretary. The bill would provide for an alternate member for each district instead of providing an alternate member for each producer member of the commission. The bill would provide for 2 alternate handler members and for each alternate handler member to be assigned to serve as an alternate to two handler members, as specified, instead of providing an alternate handler member for each handler member of the commission. The bill would make conforming and other related changes. (2) Existing law, the California Salmon Marketing and Development Act, creates the California Salmon Council, consisting of 9 voting members, appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, and 5 nonvoting members, as provided. Under existing law, the council is required to provide advice and investigations for, and perform duties delegated to it by, the secretary, including programs to promote education, research, and public information regarding the consumption of salmon and salmon products. Existing law provides for referendum voting by commercial salmon vessel operators, as defined, to determine whether the act should be implemented and, periodically, to review whether the operation of the act and the council should be continued. Upon approval of the referendum, existing law requires fishermen to pay specified assessments to the secretary and requires the secretary to expend and invest those moneys for purposes of the act. A violation of the act is a misdemeanor. This bill would change the composition of the council to include 3 nonvoting members and would make various changes to the requirements covering commercial salmon fishing, with regard to notification of the adopted regulations by the secretary. The bill would require the secretary to establish a list of handlers, defined to include processors, receivers, and wholesalers, and would provide for referendum voting by those handlers to determine whether they shall be subject to the act. Upon approval of the referendum, the bill would change the composition of the council to include 11 voting members appointed by the secretary. Upon approval of the referendum, the bill would require fishermen who sell salmon to the ultimate consumer and handlers to pay specified assessments to the secretary and would require the secretary to expend and invest those moneys for purposes of the act, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would include handlers, if subject to the act, in the periodic referenda to determine whether the operation of the act and the council should be continued and would make other conforming changes. By authorizing handlers to be subject to the requirements of the act, the violation of which is a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 958?
- AB 958 is sponsored by Committee on Agriculture.
- What is the current status of AB 958?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 958?
- Track AB 958 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 958
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 958
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →