California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2890 — Drinking water and wastewater operator certification programs.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 305, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 29, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the State Water Resources Control Board to examine and certify persons as to their qualifications to supervise or operate water treatment plants and water distribution systems. Existing law requires the certification to indicate the classification of water treatment plant or water distribution system that the person is qualified to supervise or operate. This bill would require the board to appoint an advisory committee to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities to examine and certify people to operate water treatment plants and water distribution systems. This bill would require the advisory committee to review all proposed regulations and make recommendations to the board. Existing law provides for water treatment operators-in-training, meaning people who do not yet meet the experience requirements for a specific water treatment operator grade. This bill would eliminate the category of a water treatment operator-in-training. Existing law authorizes the board to suspend, revoke, or refuse to grant or renew any water treatment operator certificate or water treatment operator-in-training certificate to operate or supervise the operation of a water treatment plant or to place on probation or reprimand the certificate holder upon any reasonable grounds. This bill would include willful or negligent acts that cause or allow the violation of certain laws as reasonable grounds for those purposes and would specify the rules for a board hearing prior to suspension or revocation of a valid operator certificate. This bill would provide that a person who submits to the board false or misleading information on an application or examination for a water treatment operator certificate or water distribution operator certificate may be liable civilly in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each violation. This bill would make a person who operates or is in responsible charge and allows the employment of a person who operates a water treatment plant or water distribution system that does not hold a valid, unexpired certificate of the appropriate grade guilty of a misdemeanor and would provide that civil liability may be imposed in an amount not to exceed $100 for each day of violation. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the board to establish fee schedules for the issuance, replacement, reinstatement, continuing education, and renewal of certificates to provide revenues that do not exceed the amount necessary, but are sufficient, to recover all costs incurred in the administration of these certification provisions. Existing law establishes the Drinking Water Operator Certification Special Account in the State Treasury and provides that fees collected by the board to recover the costs of the certification provisions are to be deposited in the account. This bill would specify that the moneys in the account are available, upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would require the board to adopt, by emergency regulations, a schedule of fees to recover costs incurred for the purposes of these certification provisions, as prescribed. This bill would require the board to review and revise the fees, as necessary, each fiscal year. Existing law requires the board to evaluate the water distribution operator certification program of the California-Nevada Section of the American Water Works Association and issue an appropriate water distribution operator certificate for those certified operators that have satisfied the provisions regulating water distribution system operators. Existing law requires the board to recognize as valid and sufficient certificates issued by certification programs of other states, as specified. This bill would repeal these provisions and instead would require the board to issue a water treatment operator certificate and water distribution operator certificate by reciprocity to any person holding a valid, unexpired, comparable certification issued by another state, the United States, prescribed territories or tribal governments, or a unit of any of these. (2) Existing law requires the State Water Resources Control Board to classify types of wastewater treatment plants for the purpose of determining the levels of competence necessary to operate them. Existing law requires supervisors and operators of wastewater treatment plants to possess a certificate of appropriate grade. Existing law authorizes the board to exempt from these requirements certain facilities. This bill would require a person who operates a nonexempt wastewater treatment plant to possess a valid, unexpired wastewater certificate or water treatment operator certificate of the appropriate grade. The bill would require the board to prescribe the procedures and requirements for designation of a chief plant operator and the duties of a chief plant operator. Existing law authorizes the board to suspend, revoke, or refuse to grant or renew any certificate issued by the board to operate a wastewater treatment plant or to place on probation or reprimand the certificate holder upon any reasonable grounds. This bill would include willful or negligent acts that cause or allow the violation of the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act as reasonable grounds for these purposes. Under existing law, any person who submits to the board false or misleading information on an application for a certificate to operate a wastewater treatment plant or on an application for registration may be liable civilly in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each violation. This bill would add that any person who submits to the board false or misleading information on an application for an examination for a wastewater certificate may be liable civilly in that amount. Under existing law, operating, owning, or allowing the employment of a person who operates a wastewater treatment plant that does not hold a valid, unexpired certificate of the appropriate grade is a misdemeanor and civil liability may be imposed in an amount not to exceed $100 for each day of violation. This bill would make a person who operates a wastewater treatment plant without a wastewater certificate or a water recycling treatment plant without a wastewater certificate or water treatment operator certificate, as prescribed, guilty of a misdemeanor and provides that civil liability may be imposed. This bill would make employing such a person subject to the same penalties. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires certificates to be renewed biennially. This bill would require a wastewater certificate issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2017, to be renewed triennially. Existing law authorizes the board to impose fees to cover the costs of the wastewater treatment plant operator certification program, and requires the fees to be deposited in the Wastewater Operator Certification Fund. Existing law authorizes the board to expend the moneys in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of administering the program. This bill would require the board to establish a fee schedule to provide revenues that do not exceed the amount necessary, but are sufficient, to recover all the costs of the program. This bill would require the board to adopt, by emergency regulations, a schedule of fees to recover costs incurred for the purposes of this program, as prescribed. This bill would require the board to review and revise the fees, as necessary, each fiscal year. Existing law requires any operator employed at certain privately owned facilities used primarily in the treatment or reclamation of sewage to pass any written examination administered by the board and to be credited with one year of experience for purposes of operator certification. Existing law authorizes the board to charge a reasonable fee for administering these provisions. This bill would eliminate these provisions. Existing law authorizes the board to approve courses of instruction at higher educational institutions that will qualify operators for each grade of certification and approve courses of instruction given by professional associations, nonprofit private agencies, or public agencies that are deemed equivalent. This bill would eliminate the requirement that the private agencies be nonprofit. Existing law requires the board to appoint an advisory committee to assist it in carrying out its wastewater treatment plant classification and operator certification responsibilities. Existing law provides that the advisory committee consists of 9 persons. This bill would add a 10th person to the advisory committee, a person employed as an operator at a water recycling treatment plant. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 305, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 24. Page 6047.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 18 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 11. Page 4975.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

  14. Referred to Com. on E.Q.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 26. Page 4769.)

  17. Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 4719.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (April 27).

  20. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  22. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials · Primary
  • Ting · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Ting

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 53 Yea · 24 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 472102
Democratic 5000
Republican 1301
Total 532403
% of votes cast 66%30%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Olsen — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gray — Yea
Harper — Nay
Lopez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kim — Nay
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Atkins — Yea
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Burke — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chang — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Wood — Yea
Hadley — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 27 Yea · 11 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 251001
Democratic 2100
Total 271101
% of votes cast 69%28%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Glazer — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Huff — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 51 Yea · 26 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 462202
Democratic 5000
Republican 0401
Total 512603
% of votes cast 64%33%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Not Voting
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harper — Nay
Holden — Yea
Gray — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Nay
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Atkins — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Burke — Not Voting
Kim — Nay
Baker — Nay
Chang — Nay
Steinorth — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Hadley — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 6 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11401
Democratic 2000
Republican 0200
Total 13601
% of votes cast 65%30%0%5%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Chang — Nay
Daly — Yea
Holden — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2890 do?
(1) Existing law requires the State Water Resources Control Board to examine and certify persons as to their qualifications to supervise or operate water treatment plants and water distribution systems. Existing law requires the certification to indicate the classification of water treatment plant or water distribution system that the person is qualified to supervise or operate. This bill would require the board to appoint an advisory committee to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities to examine and certify people to operate water treatment plants and water distribution systems. This bill would require the advisory committee to review all proposed regulations and make recommendations to the board. Existing law provides for water treatment operators-in-training, meaning people who do not yet meet the experience requirements for a specific water treatment operator grade. This bill would eliminate the category of a water treatment operator-in-training. Existing law authorizes the board to suspend, revoke, or refuse to grant or renew any water treatment operator certificate or water treatment operator-in-training certificate to operate or supervise the operation of a water treatment plant or to place on probation or reprimand the certificate holder upon any reasonable grounds. This bill would include willful or negligent acts that cause or allow the violation of certain laws as reasonable grounds for those purposes and would specify the rules for a board hearing prior to suspension or revocation of a valid operator certificate. This bill would provide that a person who submits to the board false or misleading information on an application or examination for a water treatment operator certificate or water distribution operator certificate may be liable civilly in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each violation. This bill would make a person who operates or is in responsible charge and allows the employment of a person who operates a water treatment plant or water distribution system that does not hold a valid, unexpired certificate of the appropriate grade guilty of a misdemeanor and would provide that civil liability may be imposed in an amount not to exceed $100 for each day of violation. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the board to establish fee schedules for the issuance, replacement, reinstatement, continuing education, and renewal of certificates to provide revenues that do not exceed the amount necessary, but are sufficient, to recover all costs incurred in the administration of these certification provisions. Existing law establishes the Drinking Water Operator Certification Special Account in the State Treasury and provides that fees collected by the board to recover the costs of the certification provisions are to be deposited in the account. This bill would specify that the moneys in the account are available, upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would require the board to adopt, by emergency regulations, a schedule of fees to recover costs incurred for the purposes of these certification provisions, as prescribed. This bill would require the board to review and revise the fees, as necessary, each fiscal year. Existing law requires the board to evaluate the water distribution operator certification program of the California-Nevada Section of the American Water Works Association and issue an appropriate water distribution operator certificate for those certified operators that have satisfied the provisions regulating water distribution system operators. Existing law requires the board to recognize as valid and sufficient certificates issued by certification programs of other states, as specified. This bill would repeal these provisions and instead would require the board to issue a water treatment operator certificate and water distribution operator certificate by reciprocity to any person holding a valid, unexpired, comparable certification issued by another state, the United States, prescribed territories or tribal governments, or a unit of any of these. (2) Existing law requires the State Water Resources Control Board to classify types of wastewater treatment plants for the purpose of determining the levels of competence necessary to operate them. Existing law requires supervisors and operators of wastewater treatment plants to possess a certificate of appropriate grade. Existing law authorizes the board to exempt from these requirements certain facilities. This bill would require a person who operates a nonexempt wastewater treatment plant to possess a valid, unexpired wastewater certificate or water treatment operator certificate of the appropriate grade. The bill would require the board to prescribe the procedures and requirements for designation of a chief plant operator and the duties of a chief plant operator. Existing law authorizes the board to suspend, revoke, or refuse to grant or renew any certificate issued by the board to operate a wastewater treatment plant or to place on probation or reprimand the certificate holder upon any reasonable grounds. This bill would include willful or negligent acts that cause or allow the violation of the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act as reasonable grounds for these purposes. Under existing law, any person who submits to the board false or misleading information on an application for a certificate to operate a wastewater treatment plant or on an application for registration may be liable civilly in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each violation. This bill would add that any person who submits to the board false or misleading information on an application for an examination for a wastewater certificate may be liable civilly in that amount. Under existing law, operating, owning, or allowing the employment of a person who operates a wastewater treatment plant that does not hold a valid, unexpired certificate of the appropriate grade is a misdemeanor and civil liability may be imposed in an amount not to exceed $100 for each day of violation. This bill would make a person who operates a wastewater treatment plant without a wastewater certificate or a water recycling treatment plant without a wastewater certificate or water treatment operator certificate, as prescribed, guilty of a misdemeanor and provides that civil liability may be imposed. This bill would make employing such a person subject to the same penalties. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires certificates to be renewed biennially. This bill would require a wastewater certificate issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2017, to be renewed triennially. Existing law authorizes the board to impose fees to cover the costs of the wastewater treatment plant operator certification program, and requires the fees to be deposited in the Wastewater Operator Certification Fund. Existing law authorizes the board to expend the moneys in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of administering the program. This bill would require the board to establish a fee schedule to provide revenues that do not exceed the amount necessary, but are sufficient, to recover all the costs of the program. This bill would require the board to adopt, by emergency regulations, a schedule of fees to recover costs incurred for the purposes of this program, as prescribed. This bill would require the board to review and revise the fees, as necessary, each fiscal year. Existing law requires any operator employed at certain privately owned facilities used primarily in the treatment or reclamation of sewage to pass any written examination administered by the board and to be credited with one year of experience for purposes of operator certification. Existing law authorizes the board to charge a reasonable fee for administering these provisions. This bill would eliminate these provisions. Existing law authorizes the board to approve courses of instruction at higher educational institutions that will qualify operators for each grade of certification and approve courses of instruction given by professional associations, nonprofit private agencies, or public agencies that are deemed equivalent. This bill would eliminate the requirement that the private agencies be nonprofit. Existing law requires the board to appoint an advisory committee to assist it in carrying out its wastewater treatment plant classification and operator certification responsibilities. Existing law provides that the advisory committee consists of 9 persons. This bill would add a 10th person to the advisory committee, a person employed as an operator at a water recycling treatment plant. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2890?
AB 2890 is sponsored by Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials and Ting.
What is the current status of AB 2890?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 29, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2890?
Track AB 2890 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2890

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2890

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →