Public schools: Asian Lunar New Year's Day.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 616 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 616.
You're tracking SB 616
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 616 — Public schools: Asian Lunar New Year's Day.
Last action — June 22 set for second hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law designates particular days each year as having special significance, and encourages all public schools and educational institutions to observe those days and to conduct suitable commemorative exercises on those days. This bill would express legislative findings and declarations relating to the Asian Lunar New Year. The bill would require the Governor, each year, to designate the date corresponding with the start of the Asian lunar calendar as Asian Lunar New Year's Day, a day having special significance. The bill would also encourage all public schools and educational institutions to conduct exercises observing the Asian Lunar New Year with appropriate activities and programs.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/04/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf January 04, 2016
- Introduced 02/27/15 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2015
- SB616 View text html
Action History
-
June 22 set for second hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
-
June 15 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2914.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 2894.) (January 13).
-
Set for hearing January 13.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 1.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Cannella · Cosponsor
- Chang · Cosponsor
- Dodd · Cosponsor
- Hall · Cosponsor
- Harper · Cosponsor
- Huff · Primary
- Kim · Cosponsor
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Liu · Cosponsor
- Maienschein · Cosponsor
- Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Nielsen · Cosponsor
- Vidak · Cosponsor
- Waldron · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 106 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Huff
Co-sponsors (15)
- Bates
- Cannella
- Chang
- Dodd
- Hall
- Harper
- Kim
- Leno
- Liu
- Maienschein
- Nguyen
- Nielsen
- Vidak
- Waldron
- Wilk
Not signed on (106)
106 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 106 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 0% | 0% | 71% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kim | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Thurmond | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kim | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 616 do?
- Existing law designates particular days each year as having special significance, and encourages all public schools and educational institutions to observe those days and to conduct suitable commemorative exercises on those days. This bill would express legislative findings and declarations relating to the Asian Lunar New Year. The bill would require the Governor, each year, to designate the date corresponding with the start of the Asian lunar calendar as Asian Lunar New Year's Day, a day having special significance. The bill would also encourage all public schools and educational institutions to conduct exercises observing the Asian Lunar New Year with appropriate activities and programs.
- Who sponsors SB 616?
- SB 616 is sponsored by Bates, Cannella, Chang, Dodd, Hall, Harper, Huff, Kim, Leno, Liu, Maienschein, Nguyen, Nielsen, Vidak, Waldron, and Wilk.
- What is the current status of SB 616?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 616?
- Track SB 616 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 616
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 616
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →