Medi-Cal: demonstration project.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1568 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1568.
You're tracking AB 1568
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1568 — Medi-Cal: demonstration project.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 42, Statutes of 2016.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 04, 2016. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits and services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides for a demonstration project, known as California's "Bridge to Reform" Medicaid demonstration project, under the Medi-Cal program until October 31, 2015, to implement specified objectives, including better care coordination for seniors and persons with disabilities and maximization of opportunities to reduce the number of uninsured individuals. Existing law requires the department to seek a subsequent demonstration project to implement specified objectives, including maximizing federal Medicaid funding for county public hospitals health systems and components that maintain a comparable level of support for delivery system reform in the county public hospital health systems as was provided under California's "Bridge to Reform" Medicaid demonstration project. SB 815 of the 2015–16 Regular Session, if enacted, would establish the Medi-Cal 2020 Demonstration Project Act, under which the department is required to implement specified components of the subsequent demonstration project, referred to as California's Medi-Cal 2020 demonstration project, consistent with the Special Terms and Conditions approved by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This bill would require the department to establish and operate the Whole Person Care pilot program, a component of the Medi-Cal 2020 demonstration project, under which counties, Medi-Cal managed care plans, and community providers that elect to participate in the pilot program are provided an opportunity to establish a new model for integrated care delivery that incorporates health care needs, behavioral needs, and social support, including housing and other supportive services, for the state's most high-risk, high-utilizing populations. The bill would establish the Whole Person Care Pilot Special Fund in the State Treasury, which would consist of moneys that a participating governmental agency or entity elects to transfer to the department as a condition of participation in the pilot program. The bill would provide that these funds shall be continuously appropriated, thereby making an appropriation, to the department to be used to fund the nonfederal share of any payments of Whole Person Care pilot payments authorized under California's Medi-Cal 2020 demonstration project. The bill would require the department to implement the Dental Transformation Initiative (DTI) , a component of the Medi-Cal 2020 demonstration project, under which DTI incentive payments, as defined, within specified domain categories would be made available to qualified providers who meet achievements within one or more of the project domains. The bill would provide that providers in either the dental fee-for-service or dental managed care Medi-Cal delivery systems would be eligible to participate in the DTI. The bill would require the department to conduct, or arrange to have conducted, any study, report, assessment, evaluation, or other similar demonstration project activity required under the Special Terms and Conditions. The bill would become operative only if SB 815 of the 2015–16 Regular Session is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2017. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/01/16 - Chaptered Current pdf July 01, 2016
- Enrolled 06/27/16 - Enrolled pdf June 27, 2016
- Amended 06/02/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 02, 2016
- Amended 05/03/16 - Amended Assembly pdf May 03, 2016
- Amended 04/11/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 11, 2016
- Introduced 01/04/16 - Introduced pdf January 04, 2016
- AB1568 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 42, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5507.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4509.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 20).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 5017.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 27).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Atkins · Cosponsor
- Dahle · Cosponsor
- Wood · Cosponsor
- Joaquin Arambula · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
Co-sponsors (4)
- Atkins
- Dahle
- Wood
- Arambula, Joaquin Democratic
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1568 do?
- Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits and services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides for a demonstration project, known as California's "Bridge to Reform" Medicaid demonstration project, under the Medi-Cal program until October 31, 2015, to implement specified objectives, including better care coordination for seniors and persons with disabilities and maximization of opportunities to reduce the number of uninsured individuals. Existing law requires the department to seek a subsequent demonstration project to implement specified objectives, including maximizing federal Medicaid funding for county public hospitals health systems and components that maintain a comparable level of support for delivery system reform in the county public hospital health systems as was provided under California's "Bridge to Reform" Medicaid demonstration project. SB 815 of the 2015–16 Regular Session, if enacted, would establish the Medi-Cal 2020 Demonstration Project Act, under which the department is required to implement specified components of the subsequent demonstration project, referred to as California's Medi-Cal 2020 demonstration project, consistent with the Special Terms and Conditions approved by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This bill would require the department to establish and operate the Whole Person Care pilot program, a component of the Medi-Cal 2020 demonstration project, under which counties, Medi-Cal managed care plans, and community providers that elect to participate in the pilot program are provided an opportunity to establish a new model for integrated care delivery that incorporates health care needs, behavioral needs, and social support, including housing and other supportive services, for the state's most high-risk, high-utilizing populations. The bill would establish the Whole Person Care Pilot Special Fund in the State Treasury, which would consist of moneys that a participating governmental agency or entity elects to transfer to the department as a condition of participation in the pilot program. The bill would provide that these funds shall be continuously appropriated, thereby making an appropriation, to the department to be used to fund the nonfederal share of any payments of Whole Person Care pilot payments authorized under California's Medi-Cal 2020 demonstration project. The bill would require the department to implement the Dental Transformation Initiative (DTI) , a component of the Medi-Cal 2020 demonstration project, under which DTI incentive payments, as defined, within specified domain categories would be made available to qualified providers who meet achievements within one or more of the project domains. The bill would provide that providers in either the dental fee-for-service or dental managed care Medi-Cal delivery systems would be eligible to participate in the DTI. The bill would require the department to conduct, or arrange to have conducted, any study, report, assessment, evaluation, or other similar demonstration project activity required under the Special Terms and Conditions. The bill would become operative only if SB 815 of the 2015–16 Regular Session is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2017. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1568?
- AB 1568 is sponsored by Atkins, Dahle, Wood, Arambula, Joaquin (Democratic), and Bonta, Mia (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1568?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 04, 2016. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1568?
- Track AB 1568 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1568
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1568
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →