Insurance: earthquake: mandatory offer.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 499 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 499.
You're tracking AB 499
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 499 — Insurance: earthquake: mandatory offer.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 549, Statutes of 2016.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides that a policy of residential property insurance may not be issued or delivered or, under certain circumstances, initially renewed by an insurer unless the named insured is offered coverage for loss or damage caused by an earthquake. The required offer of earthquake coverage is authorized to be made prior to, concurrent with, or within 60 days following the issuance or renewal of a residential property insurance policy and must contain certain disclosure language. Existing law provides that when the insurer, agent, or broker establishes delivery of the disclosure form by obtaining the signature of the applicant or insured, or when an insurer, agent, or broker provides the applicant with the disclosure form and the applicant does not return a signed acknowledgment of receipt within 60 days of the date it was provided, there is a conclusive presumption that the insurer, agent, or broker has complied with the disclosure requirements. This bill would delete the above presumption. Existing law requires that if an offer of earthquake coverage is accepted, the coverage continues at the applicable rates and conditions for the policy term, provided the policy of residential property insurance is not terminated by the named insured or insurer. At any renewal, an insurer is authorized to modify the terms and conditions of an existing earthquake insurance policy, rider, or endorsement as long as the modified terms and conditions provide the minimum insurance coverages required and the insurer provides the insured with a stand-alone document disclosing the changes, as specified. This bill would, among other things, instead require an insurer modifying the terms and conditions of an existing earthquake insurance policy, rider, or endorsement at renewal to provide the insured with the stand-alone document disclosing the changes when the modification of the terms and conditions reduces or substantially differs from the coverage previously provided to the insured. Existing law provides that proof of mailing of the offer by first-class mail addressed to a named insured or applicant at the mailing address shown on the policy or application, or proof that the offer of coverage was sent to the named insured or applicant by electronic transmission, creates a conclusive presumption that the offer was made. This bill would, among other things, add that if an offer, disclosure, or document required to be delivered is not mailed, but hand delivered to the insured, the insured's signed receipt would create a conclusive presumption that the offer was provided or that the disclosure or document was delivered as required. This bill would also make technical and clarifying changes. This bill would provide that specified provisions of the act would only become operative if AB 2591 is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2017.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/24/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 24, 2016
- Enrolled 08/31/16 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2016
- Amended 06/09/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 09, 2016
- Introduced 02/23/15 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2015
- AB499 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 549, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6446.).
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 25).
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4649.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 22).
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1263.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 28).
-
Referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Cooley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cooley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 499 do?
- Existing law provides that a policy of residential property insurance may not be issued or delivered or, under certain circumstances, initially renewed by an insurer unless the named insured is offered coverage for loss or damage caused by an earthquake. The required offer of earthquake coverage is authorized to be made prior to, concurrent with, or within 60 days following the issuance or renewal of a residential property insurance policy and must contain certain disclosure language. Existing law provides that when the insurer, agent, or broker establishes delivery of the disclosure form by obtaining the signature of the applicant or insured, or when an insurer, agent, or broker provides the applicant with the disclosure form and the applicant does not return a signed acknowledgment of receipt within 60 days of the date it was provided, there is a conclusive presumption that the insurer, agent, or broker has complied with the disclosure requirements. This bill would delete the above presumption. Existing law requires that if an offer of earthquake coverage is accepted, the coverage continues at the applicable rates and conditions for the policy term, provided the policy of residential property insurance is not terminated by the named insured or insurer. At any renewal, an insurer is authorized to modify the terms and conditions of an existing earthquake insurance policy, rider, or endorsement as long as the modified terms and conditions provide the minimum insurance coverages required and the insurer provides the insured with a stand-alone document disclosing the changes, as specified. This bill would, among other things, instead require an insurer modifying the terms and conditions of an existing earthquake insurance policy, rider, or endorsement at renewal to provide the insured with the stand-alone document disclosing the changes when the modification of the terms and conditions reduces or substantially differs from the coverage previously provided to the insured. Existing law provides that proof of mailing of the offer by first-class mail addressed to a named insured or applicant at the mailing address shown on the policy or application, or proof that the offer of coverage was sent to the named insured or applicant by electronic transmission, creates a conclusive presumption that the offer was made. This bill would, among other things, add that if an offer, disclosure, or document required to be delivered is not mailed, but hand delivered to the insured, the insured's signed receipt would create a conclusive presumption that the offer was provided or that the disclosure or document was delivered as required. This bill would also make technical and clarifying changes. This bill would provide that specified provisions of the act would only become operative if AB 2591 is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2017.
- Who sponsors AB 499?
- AB 499 is sponsored by Cooley.
- What is the current status of AB 499?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 499?
- Track AB 499 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 499
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 499
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →