Public safety officers and firefighters: investigations and interviews.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 651 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 651.
You're tracking AB 651
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 651 — Public safety officers and firefighters: investigations and interviews.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act and the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act grant certain rights to firefighters and public safety officers, as defined. The acts require that, when a firefighter or public safety officer is under investigation and is interrogated by his or her commanding officer, or another member of the employing agency, on matters than that could lead to punitive action, the interrogation be conducted under certain conditions. Upon the filing of a formal written statement of charges or when an interrogation focuses on matters that, in the case of a firefighter, may result in punitive action or, in the case of a public safety officer, are likely to result in punitive action, the acts grant the firefighter or public safety officer a right to be represented by a person of his or her choice, except as specified, who may be present at all times during the interrogation. The acts prohibit requiring the representative to make certain disclosures or subjecting the representative to punitive action for refusing to make those disclosures. This bill, in an investigation that focuses on matters that may result in punitive action against a firefighter or public safety officer who is not formally under investigation but is interviewed as a witness in an investigation of another firefighter or public safety officer, would grant the firefighter or public safety officer who is a witness the right to have representation in the interview at the time that he or she has reasonable cause to believe that the interrogation may result in punitive action against him or her. If the firefighter or public safety officer requests representation and the request is denied, the bill would prohibit statements taken after the request is made from being used against the firefighter or public safety officer in a disciplinary proceeding or in determining or imposing a punitive action.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/31/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 31, 2016
- Amended 04/09/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 09, 2015
- Amended 03/17/15 - Amended Assembly pdf March 17, 2015
- Introduced 02/24/15 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2015
- AB651 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 3. Page 1331.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 22).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Cooper · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cooper
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 70 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 4% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 651 do?
- The Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act and the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act grant certain rights to firefighters and public safety officers, as defined. The acts require that, when a firefighter or public safety officer is under investigation and is interrogated by his or her commanding officer, or another member of the employing agency, on matters than that could lead to punitive action, the interrogation be conducted under certain conditions. Upon the filing of a formal written statement of charges or when an interrogation focuses on matters that, in the case of a firefighter, may result in punitive action or, in the case of a public safety officer, are likely to result in punitive action, the acts grant the firefighter or public safety officer a right to be represented by a person of his or her choice, except as specified, who may be present at all times during the interrogation. The acts prohibit requiring the representative to make certain disclosures or subjecting the representative to punitive action for refusing to make those disclosures. This bill, in an investigation that focuses on matters that may result in punitive action against a firefighter or public safety officer who is not formally under investigation but is interviewed as a witness in an investigation of another firefighter or public safety officer, would grant the firefighter or public safety officer who is a witness the right to have representation in the interview at the time that he or she has reasonable cause to believe that the interrogation may result in punitive action against him or her. If the firefighter or public safety officer requests representation and the request is denied, the bill would prohibit statements taken after the request is made from being used against the firefighter or public safety officer in a disciplinary proceeding or in determining or imposing a punitive action.
- Who sponsors AB 651?
- AB 651 is sponsored by Cooper.
- What is the current status of AB 651?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 651?
- Track AB 651 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 651
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 651
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →