Contractors: home improvement salespersons.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2286 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2286.
You're tracking AB 2286
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2286 — Contractors: home improvement salespersons.
Last action — Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Contractors' State License Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of contractors, including home improvement contractors, by the Contractors' State License Board within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law also provides for the registration and regulation of home improvement salespersons, who are employed by a licensed home improvement contractor, by the board. Existing law requires the fees and civil penalties received under this law to be deposited in the Contractors' License Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. Existing law authorizes the board to set fees by regulation and sets forth certain limitations on those fees. Existing law, in connection with a delinquent application for the renewal of registration of a home improvement salesperson, establishes a delinquent renewal penalty. This bill would increase various fee limitations and would additionally provide that the application fee to add personnel to an existing license be no more than $150. The bill would also increase the delinquent renewal penalty described above. Because the increased and new fees would be deposited into the Contractors' License Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law, on and after July 1, 2016, requires a board within the department to expedite, and authorizes the department to assist with, the initial licensure process for an applicant who supplied satisfactory evidence that he or she has served as an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States and was honorably discharged. Existing law also establishes a similar expedited licensure process for an applicant who holds a current license in another jurisdiction and has a specified relationship with such an active duty member who is assigned to a duty station in this state under official orders. This bill would require the board to establish, by regulation, expedited processes for applications for licensure of contractors and registration of home improvement salespersons, including criteria for approval. The bill would exempt from these regulations an application that is required to be expedited pursuant to other law, including, but not limited to, the applications of those aforementioned applicants who have, among other things, served as an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States or have a specified relationship with such an active duty member.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/18/16 - Introduced Current pdf February 18, 2016
- AB2286 View text html
Action History
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 15. Page 4563.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 20).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Mullin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mullin
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 15 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 19% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 0% | 0% | 45% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 13 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 6% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2286 do?
- Existing law, the Contractors' State License Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of contractors, including home improvement contractors, by the Contractors' State License Board within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law also provides for the registration and regulation of home improvement salespersons, who are employed by a licensed home improvement contractor, by the board. Existing law requires the fees and civil penalties received under this law to be deposited in the Contractors' License Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. Existing law authorizes the board to set fees by regulation and sets forth certain limitations on those fees. Existing law, in connection with a delinquent application for the renewal of registration of a home improvement salesperson, establishes a delinquent renewal penalty. This bill would increase various fee limitations and would additionally provide that the application fee to add personnel to an existing license be no more than $150. The bill would also increase the delinquent renewal penalty described above. Because the increased and new fees would be deposited into the Contractors' License Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law, on and after July 1, 2016, requires a board within the department to expedite, and authorizes the department to assist with, the initial licensure process for an applicant who supplied satisfactory evidence that he or she has served as an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States and was honorably discharged. Existing law also establishes a similar expedited licensure process for an applicant who holds a current license in another jurisdiction and has a specified relationship with such an active duty member who is assigned to a duty station in this state under official orders. This bill would require the board to establish, by regulation, expedited processes for applications for licensure of contractors and registration of home improvement salespersons, including criteria for approval. The bill would exempt from these regulations an application that is required to be expedited pursuant to other law, including, but not limited to, the applications of those aforementioned applicants who have, among other things, served as an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States or have a specified relationship with such an active duty member.
- Who sponsors AB 2286?
- AB 2286 is sponsored by Mullin.
- What is the current status of AB 2286?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2286?
- Track AB 2286 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2286
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2286
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →