California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 945 — Pet boarding facilities.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 364, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law regulates the care and maintenance of animals in the care of a pet store. This bill would establish procedures for the care and maintenance of pets boarded at a pet boarding facility, including, but not limited to, sanitation, provision of enrichment for the pet, health of the pet, and safety. The bill would specifically authorize a city, county, or city and county to adopt ordinances that establish additional standards and requirements for a pet boarding facility. The bill would require an animal control officer, a humane officer, or a peace officer who detects a violation of specified provisions by a pet boarding facility operator to issue a notice to correct and would provide that if the operator complies with the notice to correct he or she would not be subject to an infraction, except as provided. The bill would provide that an operator that causes or allows harm or injury to an animal or allows an animal to be subject to an unreasonable risk of harm or injury is guilty of a misdemeanor. The bill, except as provided, would make a violation of these provisions an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $250 for the first violation and not to exceed $1,000 for each subsequent violation. Because it would create a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 364, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5359.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5889.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 3).

  9. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

  12. Referred to Com. on B. & P.

  13. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  14. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 0. Page 3928.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  15. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  16. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  17. Set for hearing May 16.

  18. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. April 18 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  20. Set for hearing April 18.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3377.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  23. Set for hearing April 4.

  24. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  25. Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  26. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 5.

  27. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Monning · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Monning

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34002
Democratic 3000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Bates — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Not Voting
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 67003
Democratic 5000
Republican 5000
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brown — Yea
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Burke — Yea
Harper — Yea
Kim — Yea
Linder — Yea
Chang — Yea
Low — Yea
Brough — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15001
Democratic 2000
Republican 1001
Total 18002
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Chang — Yea
Holden — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Daly — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14000
Republican 1001
Total 15001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Holden — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Campos — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wood — Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 32 Yea · 0 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29008
Democratic 3000
Total 32008
% of votes cast 80%0%0%20%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Moorlach — Not Voting
Morrell — Not Voting
Pavley — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 945 do?
Existing law regulates the care and maintenance of animals in the care of a pet store. This bill would establish procedures for the care and maintenance of pets boarded at a pet boarding facility, including, but not limited to, sanitation, provision of enrichment for the pet, health of the pet, and safety. The bill would specifically authorize a city, county, or city and county to adopt ordinances that establish additional standards and requirements for a pet boarding facility. The bill would require an animal control officer, a humane officer, or a peace officer who detects a violation of specified provisions by a pet boarding facility operator to issue a notice to correct and would provide that if the operator complies with the notice to correct he or she would not be subject to an infraction, except as provided. The bill would provide that an operator that causes or allows harm or injury to an animal or allows an animal to be subject to an unreasonable risk of harm or injury is guilty of a misdemeanor. The bill, except as provided, would make a violation of these provisions an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $250 for the first violation and not to exceed $1,000 for each subsequent violation. Because it would create a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 945?
SB 945 is sponsored by Monning.
What is the current status of SB 945?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 945?
Track SB 945 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 945

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 945

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →