AB 700 — Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.
Last action — Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 5601.).
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and activities. The act requires a committee that supports or opposes ballot measures to name and identify itself using a name or phrase that clearly identifies the economic or other special interests of its major donors of $50,000 or more. The act also requires that if the major donors share a common employer, the identity of the employer be disclosed. This bill would repeal these provisions. (2) The act defines "expenditure" as a payment, a forgiveness of a loan, a payment of a loan by a third party, or an enforceable promise to make a payment, unless it is clear from the surrounding circumstances that it is not made for political purposes. This bill would describe circumstances in which a payment would be made for political purposes within the meaning of the definition of "expenditure." (3) The act prohibits a candidate, committee, or slate mailer organization from expending campaign funds to pay for specified telephone calls that advocate support of, or opposition to, a candidate, ballot measure, or both, unless the name of the organization that authorized or paid for the call is disclosed to the recipient of the call during the course of each call. This bill would instead make these requirements applicable to a candidate, a candidate controlled committee established for an elective office for the controlling candidate, a political party committee, and a slate mailer organization that expends campaign funds to pay for such telephone calls. (4) The act also requires advertisements, as defined, to include prescribed disclosure statements, including, among others, a requirement that the disclosure statements include the names of the persons who made the 2 highest cumulative contributions, as defined, to the committee paying for the advertisement. This bill would repeal and recast provisions of the act relating to advertisement disclosure statements. Among those changes, this bill would revise the definition of "advertisement" to exclude a number of communications, including communications paid for by a person who is not a committee and communications that involve wearing apparel, sky writing, and certain electronic media communications, as specified. The bill would prohibit specified entities from sending a mass electronic mailing, as defined, unless the name of the candidate or committee are shown in the electronic mailing preceded by the words "Paid for by" in at least the same size font as a majority of the text in the mass electronic mailing. The bill would also replace existing advertisement disclosure statements with newly prescribed disclosure statements that identify the name of the committee paying for the advertisement and the top contributors to the committee paying for the advertisement. The bill would define "top contributors" for purposes of these provisions as the persons from whom the committee paying for the advertisement received its 3 highest cumulative contributions, as specified. The bill would exempt certain committees, including committees that make independent expenditures totaling $1,000 or more in a calendar year, from the requirement to disclose the top contributors in advertisement disclosure statements. The bill would also prescribe location and format criteria for the disclosure statements that are specific to radio and telephone, television and video, print, and electronic media advertisements. (5) The act prohibits a person from making a contribution as an intermediary on behalf of another person without disclosing to the recipient of the contribution specified information about both the intermediary and the source of the contribution. The act also prohibits a person from making a contribution to a committee on the condition or with the agreement that it will be contributed to a particular candidate unless the contribution is disclosed in compliance with those requirements for contributions made by an intermediary. This bill would revise the latter provision to prohibit a person from making a contribution to a committee or candidate that is earmarked for a contribution to another committee, ballot measure, or candidate, unless the contribution is disclosed in compliance with the requirements for contributions made by an intermediary. The bill would also describe circumstances in which a contribution is deemed to be earmarked. (6) Because a violation of the act is punishable as a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (7) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/17/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 17, 2016
- Amended 06/30/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 30, 2016
- Amended 06/20/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 20, 2016
- Amended 01/14/16 - Amended Assembly pdf January 14, 2016
- Amended 01/12/16 - Amended Assembly pdf January 12, 2016
- Amended 01/07/16 - Amended Assembly pdf January 07, 2016
- Amended 05/21/15 - Amended Assembly pdf May 21, 2015
- Amended 04/14/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2015
- Introduced 02/25/15 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2015
- AB700 View text html
Action History
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 5601.).
-
Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 27. Noes 8. Page 5521.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Allen.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 5520.).
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 21).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 15. Page 3499.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (January 21).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 20).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gomez · Primary
- Levine · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gomez
Co-sponsors (1)
- Levine
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 26 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 28% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 31% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 27 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 21% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 11 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 19% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 0% | 0% | 35% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 700 do?
- (1) Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and activities. The act requires a committee that supports or opposes ballot measures to name and identify itself using a name or phrase that clearly identifies the economic or other special interests of its major donors of $50,000 or more. The act also requires that if the major donors share a common employer, the identity of the employer be disclosed. This bill would repeal these provisions. (2) The act defines "expenditure" as a payment, a forgiveness of a loan, a payment of a loan by a third party, or an enforceable promise to make a payment, unless it is clear from the surrounding circumstances that it is not made for political purposes. This bill would describe circumstances in which a payment would be made for political purposes within the meaning of the definition of "expenditure." (3) The act prohibits a candidate, committee, or slate mailer organization from expending campaign funds to pay for specified telephone calls that advocate support of, or opposition to, a candidate, ballot measure, or both, unless the name of the organization that authorized or paid for the call is disclosed to the recipient of the call during the course of each call. This bill would instead make these requirements applicable to a candidate, a candidate controlled committee established for an elective office for the controlling candidate, a political party committee, and a slate mailer organization that expends campaign funds to pay for such telephone calls. (4) The act also requires advertisements, as defined, to include prescribed disclosure statements, including, among others, a requirement that the disclosure statements include the names of the persons who made the 2 highest cumulative contributions, as defined, to the committee paying for the advertisement. This bill would repeal and recast provisions of the act relating to advertisement disclosure statements. Among those changes, this bill would revise the definition of "advertisement" to exclude a number of communications, including communications paid for by a person who is not a committee and communications that involve wearing apparel, sky writing, and certain electronic media communications, as specified. The bill would prohibit specified entities from sending a mass electronic mailing, as defined, unless the name of the candidate or committee are shown in the electronic mailing preceded by the words "Paid for by" in at least the same size font as a majority of the text in the mass electronic mailing. The bill would also replace existing advertisement disclosure statements with newly prescribed disclosure statements that identify the name of the committee paying for the advertisement and the top contributors to the committee paying for the advertisement. The bill would define "top contributors" for purposes of these provisions as the persons from whom the committee paying for the advertisement received its 3 highest cumulative contributions, as specified. The bill would exempt certain committees, including committees that make independent expenditures totaling $1,000 or more in a calendar year, from the requirement to disclose the top contributors in advertisement disclosure statements. The bill would also prescribe location and format criteria for the disclosure statements that are specific to radio and telephone, television and video, print, and electronic media advertisements. (5) The act prohibits a person from making a contribution as an intermediary on behalf of another person without disclosing to the recipient of the contribution specified information about both the intermediary and the source of the contribution. The act also prohibits a person from making a contribution to a committee on the condition or with the agreement that it will be contributed to a particular candidate unless the contribution is disclosed in compliance with those requirements for contributions made by an intermediary. This bill would revise the latter provision to prohibit a person from making a contribution to a committee or candidate that is earmarked for a contribution to another committee, ballot measure, or candidate, unless the contribution is disclosed in compliance with the requirements for contributions made by an intermediary. The bill would also describe circumstances in which a contribution is deemed to be earmarked. (6) Because a violation of the act is punishable as a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (7) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
- Who sponsors AB 700?
- AB 700 is sponsored by Gomez and Levine.
- What is the current status of AB 700?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 700?
- Track AB 700 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 700
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 700
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →