California Environmental Quality Act: City of Porterville.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1749 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1749.
You're tracking AB 1749
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1749 — California Environmental Quality Act: City of Porterville.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Berryhill.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the California Environmental Quality Act, requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The act also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would require the lead agency, in certifying the environmental impact report and in granting approvals for a certain water treatment project determined by the City of Porterville based on a certain feasibility study, as specified, to comply with specified procedures, including the concurrent preparation of the record of proceedings and the certification of the record of proceedings within 5 days of the filing of a specified notice. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Porterville. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/08/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 08, 2016
- Amended 08/01/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 01, 2016
- Amended 06/15/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 15, 2016
- Amended 04/27/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 27, 2016
- Amended 04/20/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 20, 2016
- Amended 03/28/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2016
- Introduced 02/02/16 - Introduced pdf February 02, 2016
- AB1749 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Berryhill.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 10).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 1. Page 4954.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 18).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 18).
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Cannella · Cosponsor
- Harper · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Primary
- Olsen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mathis
Co-sponsors (3)
- Cannella
- Harper
- Olsen
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 43% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 69 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 1% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Brown | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1749 do?
- Existing law, the California Environmental Quality Act, requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The act also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would require the lead agency, in certifying the environmental impact report and in granting approvals for a certain water treatment project determined by the City of Porterville based on a certain feasibility study, as specified, to comply with specified procedures, including the concurrent preparation of the record of proceedings and the certification of the record of proceedings within 5 days of the filing of a specified notice. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Porterville. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1749?
- AB 1749 is sponsored by Cannella, Harper, Mathis, and Olsen.
- What is the current status of AB 1749?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1749?
- Track AB 1749 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1749
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1749
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →