AB 2299 — Land use: housing: 2nd units.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 735, Statutes of 2016.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to regulate, among other things, the intensity of land use, and also authorizes a local agency to provide by ordinance for the creation of 2nd units in single-family and multifamily residential zones, as specified. Existing law authorizes the ordinance to designate areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency where 2nd units may be permitted, to impose specified standards on 2nd units, and to provide that 2nd units do not exceed allowable density and are a residential use, as specified. This bill would replace the term "second unit" with "accessory dwelling unit." The bill would, instead, require the ordinance to include the elements described above and would also require the ordinance to require accessory dwelling units to comply with specified conditions. This bill would require ministerial, nondiscretionary approval of an accessory dwelling unit under an existing ordinance. The bill would also specify that a local agency may reduce or eliminate parking requirements for any accessory dwelling unit located within its jurisdiction. Existing law requires that parking requirements for 2nd units not exceed one parking space per unit or per bedroom. Under existing law, additional parking may be required provided that a finding is made that the additional parking requirements are directly related to the use of the 2nd unit and are consistent with existing neighborhood standards applicable to residential dwellings. This bill would delete the above-described authorization for additional parking requirements. By increasing the duties of local officials with respect to land use regulations, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 65852.2 of the Government Code proposed by SB 1069 that would become operative only if SB 1069 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/27/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 27, 2016
- Enrolled 09/02/16 - Enrolled pdf September 02, 2016
- Amended 08/26/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 26, 2016
- Amended 08/19/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 19, 2016
- Amended 04/05/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 05, 2016
- Introduced 02/18/16 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2016
- AB2299 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 735, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 15. Page 6542.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 4. Page 5519.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Joint Rule 61(b)(16) suspended. (Page 5452.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 24. Page 5242.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 11).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
(pending re-refer to Com. on L. GOV.)
-
Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 4218.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Primary
- Wieckowski · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bloom
Co-sponsors (1)
- Wieckowski
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 60 | 15 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 19% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 31 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 10% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 0% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 0% | 0% | 36% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 47 | 18 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 24 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 30% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2299 do?
- The Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to regulate, among other things, the intensity of land use, and also authorizes a local agency to provide by ordinance for the creation of 2nd units in single-family and multifamily residential zones, as specified. Existing law authorizes the ordinance to designate areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency where 2nd units may be permitted, to impose specified standards on 2nd units, and to provide that 2nd units do not exceed allowable density and are a residential use, as specified. This bill would replace the term "second unit" with "accessory dwelling unit." The bill would, instead, require the ordinance to include the elements described above and would also require the ordinance to require accessory dwelling units to comply with specified conditions. This bill would require ministerial, nondiscretionary approval of an accessory dwelling unit under an existing ordinance. The bill would also specify that a local agency may reduce or eliminate parking requirements for any accessory dwelling unit located within its jurisdiction. Existing law requires that parking requirements for 2nd units not exceed one parking space per unit or per bedroom. Under existing law, additional parking may be required provided that a finding is made that the additional parking requirements are directly related to the use of the 2nd unit and are consistent with existing neighborhood standards applicable to residential dwellings. This bill would delete the above-described authorization for additional parking requirements. By increasing the duties of local officials with respect to land use regulations, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 65852.2 of the Government Code proposed by SB 1069 that would become operative only if SB 1069 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2299?
- AB 2299 is sponsored by Bloom and Wieckowski.
- What is the current status of AB 2299?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2299?
- Track AB 2299 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2299
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2299
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →