Recreational vehicles.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 759 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 759.
You're tracking AB 759
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 759 — Recreational vehicles.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 407, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes a New Motor Vehicle Board that regulates the activities or practices of a new motor vehicle dealer, manufacturer, manufacturer branch, distributor, distributor branch, or representative, as specified. Existing law regulates the terms and enforcement of recreational vehicle franchise agreements. Existing law requires a franchisor seeking to enter into a franchise establishing an additional motor vehicle dealership within a relevant market area where the same recreational vehicle line-make is represented, or seeking to relocate an existing motor vehicle dealership, to notify the board of that intention. Existing law allows franchisees in that recreational vehicle line-make in the relevant market area to file with the board a protest to establishing or relocating the dealership. This bill would revise these provisions and would clarify that the above provisions apply to a franchisor seeking to enter into a franchise establishing an additional recreational vehicle dealership, or seeking to relocate an existing recreational vehicle dealership, that has a relevant market area within which the same recreation vehicle line-make is represented. (2) Existing law generally requires a manufacturer, manufacturer branch, remanufacturer, remanufacturer branch, distributor, distributor branch, transporter, or dealer of vehicles to be licensed by the Department of Motor Vehicles. Existing law allows the department to suspend or revoke a license issued to a dealer upon determining that the person to whom the license was issued has willfully violated specified requirements imposed on new motor vehicle franchisors relating to providing specified information and compensation to franchisees. This bill would make the above provisions applicable to a recreational vehicle franchisor. (3) Existing law makes it a violation, punishable as an infraction, for the holder of a dealer's license to, among other things, advertise or sell a new vehicle of a line-make for which the dealer does not hold a franchise. Under existing law, this prohibition does not apply to a recreational vehicle, as defined. This bill would make the above prohibitions applicable to recreational vehicles. By increasing the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law makes it a violation, punishable as an infraction, for a licensed manufacturer or distributor to modify, replace, enter into, relocate, terminate, or refuse to renew a franchise in violation of specified provisions of law. This bill would make this prohibition subject to additional provisions of law relating to recreational vehicle manufacturers and distributors. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law prohibits a recreational vehicle manufacturer or distributor from selling a new recreational vehicle through a recreational vehicle dealer without having first entered into a written recreational vehicle franchise. This bill would, following the termination, cancellation, or non-renewal of a recreational vehicle franchise, allow the sale of any new recreational vehicle inventory that was purchased by the recreational vehicle dealer, or shipped by a manufacturer or distributor, during the period that the written recreational vehicle franchise was in effect. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 3050.7 and 11713.3 of the Vehicle Code made by this bill and AB 1178 to take effect if both bills are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/01/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 01, 2015
- Enrolled 09/14/15 - Enrolled pdf September 14, 2015
- Amended 09/04/15 - Amended Senate pdf September 04, 2015
- Amended 08/31/15 - Amended Senate pdf August 31, 2015
- Amended 03/26/15 - Amended Assembly pdf March 26, 2015
- Introduced 02/25/15 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2015
- AB759 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 407, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3077.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2631.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1224.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 22).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Linder · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Linder
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 67 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 759 do?
- (1) Existing law establishes a New Motor Vehicle Board that regulates the activities or practices of a new motor vehicle dealer, manufacturer, manufacturer branch, distributor, distributor branch, or representative, as specified. Existing law regulates the terms and enforcement of recreational vehicle franchise agreements. Existing law requires a franchisor seeking to enter into a franchise establishing an additional motor vehicle dealership within a relevant market area where the same recreational vehicle line-make is represented, or seeking to relocate an existing motor vehicle dealership, to notify the board of that intention. Existing law allows franchisees in that recreational vehicle line-make in the relevant market area to file with the board a protest to establishing or relocating the dealership. This bill would revise these provisions and would clarify that the above provisions apply to a franchisor seeking to enter into a franchise establishing an additional recreational vehicle dealership, or seeking to relocate an existing recreational vehicle dealership, that has a relevant market area within which the same recreation vehicle line-make is represented. (2) Existing law generally requires a manufacturer, manufacturer branch, remanufacturer, remanufacturer branch, distributor, distributor branch, transporter, or dealer of vehicles to be licensed by the Department of Motor Vehicles. Existing law allows the department to suspend or revoke a license issued to a dealer upon determining that the person to whom the license was issued has willfully violated specified requirements imposed on new motor vehicle franchisors relating to providing specified information and compensation to franchisees. This bill would make the above provisions applicable to a recreational vehicle franchisor. (3) Existing law makes it a violation, punishable as an infraction, for the holder of a dealer's license to, among other things, advertise or sell a new vehicle of a line-make for which the dealer does not hold a franchise. Under existing law, this prohibition does not apply to a recreational vehicle, as defined. This bill would make the above prohibitions applicable to recreational vehicles. By increasing the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law makes it a violation, punishable as an infraction, for a licensed manufacturer or distributor to modify, replace, enter into, relocate, terminate, or refuse to renew a franchise in violation of specified provisions of law. This bill would make this prohibition subject to additional provisions of law relating to recreational vehicle manufacturers and distributors. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law prohibits a recreational vehicle manufacturer or distributor from selling a new recreational vehicle through a recreational vehicle dealer without having first entered into a written recreational vehicle franchise. This bill would, following the termination, cancellation, or non-renewal of a recreational vehicle franchise, allow the sale of any new recreational vehicle inventory that was purchased by the recreational vehicle dealer, or shipped by a manufacturer or distributor, during the period that the written recreational vehicle franchise was in effect. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 3050.7 and 11713.3 of the Vehicle Code made by this bill and AB 1178 to take effect if both bills are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 759?
- AB 759 is sponsored by Linder.
- What is the current status of AB 759?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 759?
- Track AB 759 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 759
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 759
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →