Groundwater.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 13 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 13.
You're tracking SB 13
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 13 — Groundwater.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 255, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 01, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, requires all groundwater basins designated as high- or medium-priority basins by the Department of Water Resources that are designated as basins subject to critical conditions of overdraft to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan or coordinated groundwater sustainability plans by January 31, 2020, and requires all other groundwater basins designated as high- or medium-priority basins to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan or coordinated groundwater sustainability plans by January 31, 2022, except as specified. The act authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to designate a basin as a probationary basin if the state board makes a certain determination and to develop an interim plan for the probationary basin. The act requires a local agency or groundwater sustainability agency to have 90 or 180 days, as prescribed, to remedy the deficiency if the board designates the basin as a probationary basin. This bill would specify that the board is authorized to designate a high- or medium-priority basin as a probationary basin. This bill would provide a local agency or groundwater sustainability agency 90 or 180 days, as prescribed, to remedy certain deficiencies that caused the board to designate the basin as a probationary basin. This bill would authorize the board to develop an interim plan for certain probationary basins one year after the designation of the basin as a probationary basin. Existing law authorizes a combination of local agencies to form a groundwater sustainability agency by a joint powers agreement, memorandum of agreement, or other legal agreement, and authorizes a water corporation regulated by the Public Utilities Commission to participate in a groundwater sustainability agency if the local agencies approve. This bill would authorize a mutual water company to participate in a groundwater sustainability agency and would provide that a water corporation or a mutual water company may participate through a memorandum of agreement or other legal agreement. Existing law establishes a groundwater monitoring program pursuant to which specified entities, including a groundwater sustainability agency, may propose to be designated by the department as groundwater monitoring entities, as defined, for the purposes of monitoring and reporting with regard to groundwater elevations in all or part of a groundwater basin or subbasin. Existing law requires the department to identify the extent of monitoring of groundwater elevations that is being undertaken in groundwater basins and subbasins, and if the department determines that all or part of a basin or subbasin is not being monitored, to determine whether there is sufficient interest in establishing a groundwater management plan, an integrated regional water management plan, or a groundwater monitoring association. This bill, if the department determines that all or part of a basin or subbasin is not being monitored, would require the department to determine whether there is sufficient interest in establishing a groundwater sustainability plan. Existing law requires a local agency or combination of local agencies that elect to be a groundwater sustainability agency for a basin to submit a prescribed notice of intent to the department that includes the proposed boundaries of the basin and requires the department to post the notice on its Internet Web site within 15 days of receipt. This bill would eliminate these provisions. Existing law requires a groundwater sustainability agency to inform the department of its election or formation and its intent to undertake sustainable groundwater management within 30 days of forming or electing to be a groundwater sustainability agency and requires the notice to include specified information such as the service area boundaries and requires the department to post the notice on its Internet Web site within 15 days of receipt. Existing law provides that the groundwater sustainability agency is presumed the exclusive groundwater sustainability agency 90 days following the posting of notice, provided that no other notice was submitted. This bill would require local agencies to seek to reach agreement to allow prompt designation of a groundwater sustainability agency. This bill would require a new notice to be submitted and the department to post notice if agreement is reached by the local agencies involving a material change from the information in the posted notice. This bill would require the department to post only complete notices it receives. Existing law requires the department to categorize each basin as high, medium, low, or very low priority and authorizes a local agency to request that the department revise the boundaries of a basin. Existing law provides that a local agency has 2 years from the date of a reprioritization that elevates a basin to a medium- or high-priority basin to either establish a groundwater sustainability agency or submit an alternative to the department and 5 years from the date of reprioritization to adopt a groundwater sustainability plan, as prescribed. This bill would extend the deadline for a basin that is elevated to a medium- or high-priority basin before January 31, 2017, and is not subject to critical conditions of overdraft to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan to January 31, 2022. Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, governs the procedure for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law. This bill would state that a guideline, criterion, bulletin, or other technical or procedural analysis or guidance prepared by the department as required by the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act is not subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, except as prescribed.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/03/15 - Chaptered Current pdf September 03, 2015
- Enrolled 08/27/15 - Enrolled pdf August 27, 2015
- Amended 07/06/15 - Amended Assembly pdf July 06, 2015
- Amended 06/24/15 - Amended Assembly pdf June 24, 2015
- Amended 05/21/15 - Amended Assembly pdf May 21, 2015
- Amended 04/23/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 23, 2015
- Amended 02/24/15 - Amended Senate pdf February 24, 2015
- Introduced 12/01/14 - Introduced pdf December 01, 2014
- SB13 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 255, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:45 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2204.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2534.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 15).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 30).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
Referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 837.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 405.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing March 24.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 1.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pavley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Pavley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 13 do?
- Existing law, the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, requires all groundwater basins designated as high- or medium-priority basins by the Department of Water Resources that are designated as basins subject to critical conditions of overdraft to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan or coordinated groundwater sustainability plans by January 31, 2020, and requires all other groundwater basins designated as high- or medium-priority basins to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan or coordinated groundwater sustainability plans by January 31, 2022, except as specified. The act authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to designate a basin as a probationary basin if the state board makes a certain determination and to develop an interim plan for the probationary basin. The act requires a local agency or groundwater sustainability agency to have 90 or 180 days, as prescribed, to remedy the deficiency if the board designates the basin as a probationary basin. This bill would specify that the board is authorized to designate a high- or medium-priority basin as a probationary basin. This bill would provide a local agency or groundwater sustainability agency 90 or 180 days, as prescribed, to remedy certain deficiencies that caused the board to designate the basin as a probationary basin. This bill would authorize the board to develop an interim plan for certain probationary basins one year after the designation of the basin as a probationary basin. Existing law authorizes a combination of local agencies to form a groundwater sustainability agency by a joint powers agreement, memorandum of agreement, or other legal agreement, and authorizes a water corporation regulated by the Public Utilities Commission to participate in a groundwater sustainability agency if the local agencies approve. This bill would authorize a mutual water company to participate in a groundwater sustainability agency and would provide that a water corporation or a mutual water company may participate through a memorandum of agreement or other legal agreement. Existing law establishes a groundwater monitoring program pursuant to which specified entities, including a groundwater sustainability agency, may propose to be designated by the department as groundwater monitoring entities, as defined, for the purposes of monitoring and reporting with regard to groundwater elevations in all or part of a groundwater basin or subbasin. Existing law requires the department to identify the extent of monitoring of groundwater elevations that is being undertaken in groundwater basins and subbasins, and if the department determines that all or part of a basin or subbasin is not being monitored, to determine whether there is sufficient interest in establishing a groundwater management plan, an integrated regional water management plan, or a groundwater monitoring association. This bill, if the department determines that all or part of a basin or subbasin is not being monitored, would require the department to determine whether there is sufficient interest in establishing a groundwater sustainability plan. Existing law requires a local agency or combination of local agencies that elect to be a groundwater sustainability agency for a basin to submit a prescribed notice of intent to the department that includes the proposed boundaries of the basin and requires the department to post the notice on its Internet Web site within 15 days of receipt. This bill would eliminate these provisions. Existing law requires a groundwater sustainability agency to inform the department of its election or formation and its intent to undertake sustainable groundwater management within 30 days of forming or electing to be a groundwater sustainability agency and requires the notice to include specified information such as the service area boundaries and requires the department to post the notice on its Internet Web site within 15 days of receipt. Existing law provides that the groundwater sustainability agency is presumed the exclusive groundwater sustainability agency 90 days following the posting of notice, provided that no other notice was submitted. This bill would require local agencies to seek to reach agreement to allow prompt designation of a groundwater sustainability agency. This bill would require a new notice to be submitted and the department to post notice if agreement is reached by the local agencies involving a material change from the information in the posted notice. This bill would require the department to post only complete notices it receives. Existing law requires the department to categorize each basin as high, medium, low, or very low priority and authorizes a local agency to request that the department revise the boundaries of a basin. Existing law provides that a local agency has 2 years from the date of a reprioritization that elevates a basin to a medium- or high-priority basin to either establish a groundwater sustainability agency or submit an alternative to the department and 5 years from the date of reprioritization to adopt a groundwater sustainability plan, as prescribed. This bill would extend the deadline for a basin that is elevated to a medium- or high-priority basin before January 31, 2017, and is not subject to critical conditions of overdraft to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan to January 31, 2022. Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, governs the procedure for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law. This bill would state that a guideline, criterion, bulletin, or other technical or procedural analysis or guidance prepared by the department as required by the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act is not subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, except as prescribed.
- Who sponsors SB 13?
- SB 13 is sponsored by Pavley.
- What is the current status of SB 13?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 01, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 13?
- Track SB 13 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 13
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 13
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →