California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2884 — Insurance.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 304, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes the Insurance Commissioner, under specified circumstances, to examine the business and affairs of an insurer. That examination is required to be at the expense of the insurer, organization, or person examined by the commissioner, as specified. Existing law prohibits the revenue raised from the examination of insurers in the 1996–97 fiscal year from exceeding the examination fee revenue estimate for the 1996–97 Governor's Budget by more than $2,000,000. This bill would, among other things, make technical and nonsubstantive changes. The bill would also delete the provision relating to revenue raised during the 1996–97 fiscal year. (2) The Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act requires each insurer that is authorized to do business in this state and that is a member of an insurance holding company system to register with the commissioner and to file a registration statement containing specified information, including the capital structure and general financial condition of the insurer and specified transactions between the insurer and its affiliates. The act provides that the transactions by registered insurers with their affiliates are subject to various standards, including the requirement that the terms be fair and reasonable. The act provides that any insurer or any director, officer, employee, or agent of the insurer that commits a willful violation of the act is subject to criminal proceedings. This bill would require that the terms also be consistent with the current version of the NAIC Insurance Holding Company System Model Regulation. Because a willful violation of this provision would be subject to criminal proceedings, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law prohibits a person from soliciting, negotiating, or effecting contracts of insurance, or acting in the capacity of various types of insurance agents, unless the person holds a valid license from the Insurance Commissioner authorizing the person to act in that capacity. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to deny an application for a license for various reasons including if the applicant committed a felony or a misdemeanor as shown by a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. Existing law also requires an applicant to pass the qualifying examination for the license prior to receiving a permanent license and allows the applicant to retake the qualifying examination subject to reasonable time limits limiting when a person who has failed the examination may retake. This bill would add that the commissioner may deny an application for a license if the applicant has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a person who has failed any license qualification examination 10 times within the previous 12-month period from enrolling in any further license qualification examinations for a period of 12 months. (4) Existing law requires a person who is licensed in this state as an insurance agent or broker, advertises insurance on the Internet, and transacts insurance in this state, to identify certain information on the Internet, regardless of whether the insurance agent or broker maintains his or her Internet presence or if the presence is maintained on his or her behalf. The required information includes, but is not limited to, his or her name as it appears on his or her license, and any fictitious name approved by the commissioner. This bill would instead require that the person provide his or her name as filed with the commissioner that has not been disapproved pursuant to the provisions regarding the use of fictitious names. (5) Existing law prohibits an insurer from executing an undertaking of bail except by and through a person holding a bail license, as provided. Existing law also prohibits the commissioner from suspending or revoking any license, issued as specified, without first granting a hearing, as specified. This bill would prohibit the commissioner from denying a license to an applicant without first granting a hearing, as specified. (6) Existing law provides that for the purpose of determining certain benefits, that in the case of annuity contracts under which an election may be made to have annuity payments commence at optional maturity dates, the maturity date shall be deemed to be the latest date for which election is permitted by the contract. This bill would add that in the case of annuity contracts under which the fixed maturity date is later than the later of the anniversary of the contract next following the annuitant's 70th birthday or the 10th anniversary of the contract, the maturity date shall be deemed to be the later of the anniversary of the contract next following the annuitant's 70th birthday or the 10th anniversary of the contract. (7) Existing law requires the commissioner to annually prepare a consumer rate guide for long-term care insurance and to include specified information, including a history of the rates of all policies issued in California for the current year and for the 4 preceding years. This bill would require the history of the rates of all policies issued in California to be listed for the 9 preceding years. (8) Existing law provides for the regulation of insurers, including insurers issuing policies of long-term care insurance, by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law prohibits an insurer from increasing the premium for an individual or group long-term care insurance policy or certificate approved for sale unless the insurer has received prior approval for the increase from the commissioner and requires the insurer to submit to the commissioner for approval all premium rate schedule increases, as specified. Existing law further requires that approval of all premium rate schedule increases, and approved premium rate schedule increases be subject to various requirements, including filing updated projections annually for the next 3 years, as specified. This bill would require that for the above-described rate schedules, the lifetime expected loss ratio be calculated as specified. The bill would also modify the requirements that approved premium rate schedule increases are subject to by requiring the insurer to file composite rate projections if it is necessary to maintain consistent premium rates for new certificates receiving a rate increase. (9) Existing law requires an insurer, in order to be admitted in this state to transact specified workers' compensation transactions, among other things, to deposit cash instruments or approved interest-bearing securities or approved stocks readily convertible into cash, investment certificates, or share accounts issued by a savings and loan association doing business in this state and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, certificates of deposit, or savings deposits in a bank licensed to do business in this state that is either domiciled in and with its principal place of business in this state or that is a national banking association with a trust office located in this state. This bill would instead include a bank licensed to do business in this state, or a trust company, licensed to do business and located in this state that is either domiciled in and with its principal place of business in this state or that is a national banking association with a trust office located in this state. (10) Existing law requires the Insurance Commissioner to establish a program to investigate complaints and respond to inquiries received regarding the handling of insurance claims and, when warranted, to bring enforcement actions against insurers or production agencies. Existing law requires the commissioner to promulgate a regulation that sets forth the criteria that the department shall apply to determine if a complaint is deemed to be justified prior to the public release of a complaint against a specifically named insurer or production agency. This bill would authorize the commissioner to establish an Internet-accessible complaint response system to distribute and receive complaint information, as specified. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 304, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6139.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5054.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From Consent Calendar.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  12. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on INS.

  15. Referred to Com. on INS.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 4464.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  19. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 13).

  20. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Com. on INS.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Insurance · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Insurance

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70000
Democratic 5000
Republican 5000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Holden — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harper — Yea
Campos — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kim — Yea
Gray — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chang — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Medina — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Salas — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36000
Democratic 3000
Total 39000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pan — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 69001
Democratic 5000
Republican 5000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chang — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Chau — Yea
Harper — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Kim — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gray — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Medina — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wood — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 20 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 2000
Republican 2000
Total 20000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Daly — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Chang — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Chu — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2884 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes the Insurance Commissioner, under specified circumstances, to examine the business and affairs of an insurer. That examination is required to be at the expense of the insurer, organization, or person examined by the commissioner, as specified. Existing law prohibits the revenue raised from the examination of insurers in the 1996–97 fiscal year from exceeding the examination fee revenue estimate for the 1996–97 Governor's Budget by more than $2,000,000. This bill would, among other things, make technical and nonsubstantive changes. The bill would also delete the provision relating to revenue raised during the 1996–97 fiscal year. (2) The Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act requires each insurer that is authorized to do business in this state and that is a member of an insurance holding company system to register with the commissioner and to file a registration statement containing specified information, including the capital structure and general financial condition of the insurer and specified transactions between the insurer and its affiliates. The act provides that the transactions by registered insurers with their affiliates are subject to various standards, including the requirement that the terms be fair and reasonable. The act provides that any insurer or any director, officer, employee, or agent of the insurer that commits a willful violation of the act is subject to criminal proceedings. This bill would require that the terms also be consistent with the current version of the NAIC Insurance Holding Company System Model Regulation. Because a willful violation of this provision would be subject to criminal proceedings, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law prohibits a person from soliciting, negotiating, or effecting contracts of insurance, or acting in the capacity of various types of insurance agents, unless the person holds a valid license from the Insurance Commissioner authorizing the person to act in that capacity. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to deny an application for a license for various reasons including if the applicant committed a felony or a misdemeanor as shown by a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. Existing law also requires an applicant to pass the qualifying examination for the license prior to receiving a permanent license and allows the applicant to retake the qualifying examination subject to reasonable time limits limiting when a person who has failed the examination may retake. This bill would add that the commissioner may deny an application for a license if the applicant has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a person who has failed any license qualification examination 10 times within the previous 12-month period from enrolling in any further license qualification examinations for a period of 12 months. (4) Existing law requires a person who is licensed in this state as an insurance agent or broker, advertises insurance on the Internet, and transacts insurance in this state, to identify certain information on the Internet, regardless of whether the insurance agent or broker maintains his or her Internet presence or if the presence is maintained on his or her behalf. The required information includes, but is not limited to, his or her name as it appears on his or her license, and any fictitious name approved by the commissioner. This bill would instead require that the person provide his or her name as filed with the commissioner that has not been disapproved pursuant to the provisions regarding the use of fictitious names. (5) Existing law prohibits an insurer from executing an undertaking of bail except by and through a person holding a bail license, as provided. Existing law also prohibits the commissioner from suspending or revoking any license, issued as specified, without first granting a hearing, as specified. This bill would prohibit the commissioner from denying a license to an applicant without first granting a hearing, as specified. (6) Existing law provides that for the purpose of determining certain benefits, that in the case of annuity contracts under which an election may be made to have annuity payments commence at optional maturity dates, the maturity date shall be deemed to be the latest date for which election is permitted by the contract. This bill would add that in the case of annuity contracts under which the fixed maturity date is later than the later of the anniversary of the contract next following the annuitant's 70th birthday or the 10th anniversary of the contract, the maturity date shall be deemed to be the later of the anniversary of the contract next following the annuitant's 70th birthday or the 10th anniversary of the contract. (7) Existing law requires the commissioner to annually prepare a consumer rate guide for long-term care insurance and to include specified information, including a history of the rates of all policies issued in California for the current year and for the 4 preceding years. This bill would require the history of the rates of all policies issued in California to be listed for the 9 preceding years. (8) Existing law provides for the regulation of insurers, including insurers issuing policies of long-term care insurance, by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law prohibits an insurer from increasing the premium for an individual or group long-term care insurance policy or certificate approved for sale unless the insurer has received prior approval for the increase from the commissioner and requires the insurer to submit to the commissioner for approval all premium rate schedule increases, as specified. Existing law further requires that approval of all premium rate schedule increases, and approved premium rate schedule increases be subject to various requirements, including filing updated projections annually for the next 3 years, as specified. This bill would require that for the above-described rate schedules, the lifetime expected loss ratio be calculated as specified. The bill would also modify the requirements that approved premium rate schedule increases are subject to by requiring the insurer to file composite rate projections if it is necessary to maintain consistent premium rates for new certificates receiving a rate increase. (9) Existing law requires an insurer, in order to be admitted in this state to transact specified workers' compensation transactions, among other things, to deposit cash instruments or approved interest-bearing securities or approved stocks readily convertible into cash, investment certificates, or share accounts issued by a savings and loan association doing business in this state and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, certificates of deposit, or savings deposits in a bank licensed to do business in this state that is either domiciled in and with its principal place of business in this state or that is a national banking association with a trust office located in this state. This bill would instead include a bank licensed to do business in this state, or a trust company, licensed to do business and located in this state that is either domiciled in and with its principal place of business in this state or that is a national banking association with a trust office located in this state. (10) Existing law requires the Insurance Commissioner to establish a program to investigate complaints and respond to inquiries received regarding the handling of insurance claims and, when warranted, to bring enforcement actions against insurers or production agencies. Existing law requires the commissioner to promulgate a regulation that sets forth the criteria that the department shall apply to determine if a complaint is deemed to be justified prior to the public release of a complaint against a specifically named insurer or production agency. This bill would authorize the commissioner to establish an Internet-accessible complaint response system to distribute and receive complaint information, as specified. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2884?
AB 2884 is sponsored by Committee on Insurance.
What is the current status of AB 2884?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2884?
Track AB 2884 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2884

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2884

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →