Insurance.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2884 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2884.
You're tracking AB 2884
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2884 — Insurance.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 304, Statutes of 2016.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2016. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the Insurance Commissioner, under specified circumstances, to examine the business and affairs of an insurer. That examination is required to be at the expense of the insurer, organization, or person examined by the commissioner, as specified. Existing law prohibits the revenue raised from the examination of insurers in the 1996–97 fiscal year from exceeding the examination fee revenue estimate for the 1996–97 Governor's Budget by more than $2,000,000. This bill would, among other things, make technical and nonsubstantive changes. The bill would also delete the provision relating to revenue raised during the 1996–97 fiscal year. (2) The Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act requires each insurer that is authorized to do business in this state and that is a member of an insurance holding company system to register with the commissioner and to file a registration statement containing specified information, including the capital structure and general financial condition of the insurer and specified transactions between the insurer and its affiliates. The act provides that the transactions by registered insurers with their affiliates are subject to various standards, including the requirement that the terms be fair and reasonable. The act provides that any insurer or any director, officer, employee, or agent of the insurer that commits a willful violation of the act is subject to criminal proceedings. This bill would require that the terms also be consistent with the current version of the NAIC Insurance Holding Company System Model Regulation. Because a willful violation of this provision would be subject to criminal proceedings, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law prohibits a person from soliciting, negotiating, or effecting contracts of insurance, or acting in the capacity of various types of insurance agents, unless the person holds a valid license from the Insurance Commissioner authorizing the person to act in that capacity. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to deny an application for a license for various reasons including if the applicant committed a felony or a misdemeanor as shown by a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. Existing law also requires an applicant to pass the qualifying examination for the license prior to receiving a permanent license and allows the applicant to retake the qualifying examination subject to reasonable time limits limiting when a person who has failed the examination may retake. This bill would add that the commissioner may deny an application for a license if the applicant has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a person who has failed any license qualification examination 10 times within the previous 12-month period from enrolling in any further license qualification examinations for a period of 12 months. (4) Existing law requires a person who is licensed in this state as an insurance agent or broker, advertises insurance on the Internet, and transacts insurance in this state, to identify certain information on the Internet, regardless of whether the insurance agent or broker maintains his or her Internet presence or if the presence is maintained on his or her behalf. The required information includes, but is not limited to, his or her name as it appears on his or her license, and any fictitious name approved by the commissioner. This bill would instead require that the person provide his or her name as filed with the commissioner that has not been disapproved pursuant to the provisions regarding the use of fictitious names. (5) Existing law prohibits an insurer from executing an undertaking of bail except by and through a person holding a bail license, as provided. Existing law also prohibits the commissioner from suspending or revoking any license, issued as specified, without first granting a hearing, as specified. This bill would prohibit the commissioner from denying a license to an applicant without first granting a hearing, as specified. (6) Existing law provides that for the purpose of determining certain benefits, that in the case of annuity contracts under which an election may be made to have annuity payments commence at optional maturity dates, the maturity date shall be deemed to be the latest date for which election is permitted by the contract. This bill would add that in the case of annuity contracts under which the fixed maturity date is later than the later of the anniversary of the contract next following the annuitant's 70th birthday or the 10th anniversary of the contract, the maturity date shall be deemed to be the later of the anniversary of the contract next following the annuitant's 70th birthday or the 10th anniversary of the contract. (7) Existing law requires the commissioner to annually prepare a consumer rate guide for long-term care insurance and to include specified information, including a history of the rates of all policies issued in California for the current year and for the 4 preceding years. This bill would require the history of the rates of all policies issued in California to be listed for the 9 preceding years. (8) Existing law provides for the regulation of insurers, including insurers issuing policies of long-term care insurance, by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law prohibits an insurer from increasing the premium for an individual or group long-term care insurance policy or certificate approved for sale unless the insurer has received prior approval for the increase from the commissioner and requires the insurer to submit to the commissioner for approval all premium rate schedule increases, as specified. Existing law further requires that approval of all premium rate schedule increases, and approved premium rate schedule increases be subject to various requirements, including filing updated projections annually for the next 3 years, as specified. This bill would require that for the above-described rate schedules, the lifetime expected loss ratio be calculated as specified. The bill would also modify the requirements that approved premium rate schedule increases are subject to by requiring the insurer to file composite rate projections if it is necessary to maintain consistent premium rates for new certificates receiving a rate increase. (9) Existing law requires an insurer, in order to be admitted in this state to transact specified workers' compensation transactions, among other things, to deposit cash instruments or approved interest-bearing securities or approved stocks readily convertible into cash, investment certificates, or share accounts issued by a savings and loan association doing business in this state and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, certificates of deposit, or savings deposits in a bank licensed to do business in this state that is either domiciled in and with its principal place of business in this state or that is a national banking association with a trust office located in this state. This bill would instead include a bank licensed to do business in this state, or a trust company, licensed to do business and located in this state that is either domiciled in and with its principal place of business in this state or that is a national banking association with a trust office located in this state. (10) Existing law requires the Insurance Commissioner to establish a program to investigate complaints and respond to inquiries received regarding the handling of insurance claims and, when warranted, to bring enforcement actions against insurers or production agencies. Existing law requires the commissioner to promulgate a regulation that sets forth the criteria that the department shall apply to determine if a complaint is deemed to be justified prior to the public release of a complaint against a specifically named insurer or production agency. This bill would authorize the commissioner to establish an Internet-accessible complaint response system to distribute and receive complaint information, as specified. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/12/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 12, 2016
- Enrolled 08/25/16 - Enrolled pdf August 25, 2016
- Amended 08/15/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 15, 2016
- Amended 06/08/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 08, 2016
- Amended 03/30/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 30, 2016
- Introduced 02/25/16 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2016
- AB2884 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 304, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6139.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5054.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 4464.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 13).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Insurance · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Insurance
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2884 do?
- (1) Existing law authorizes the Insurance Commissioner, under specified circumstances, to examine the business and affairs of an insurer. That examination is required to be at the expense of the insurer, organization, or person examined by the commissioner, as specified. Existing law prohibits the revenue raised from the examination of insurers in the 1996–97 fiscal year from exceeding the examination fee revenue estimate for the 1996–97 Governor's Budget by more than $2,000,000. This bill would, among other things, make technical and nonsubstantive changes. The bill would also delete the provision relating to revenue raised during the 1996–97 fiscal year. (2) The Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act requires each insurer that is authorized to do business in this state and that is a member of an insurance holding company system to register with the commissioner and to file a registration statement containing specified information, including the capital structure and general financial condition of the insurer and specified transactions between the insurer and its affiliates. The act provides that the transactions by registered insurers with their affiliates are subject to various standards, including the requirement that the terms be fair and reasonable. The act provides that any insurer or any director, officer, employee, or agent of the insurer that commits a willful violation of the act is subject to criminal proceedings. This bill would require that the terms also be consistent with the current version of the NAIC Insurance Holding Company System Model Regulation. Because a willful violation of this provision would be subject to criminal proceedings, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law prohibits a person from soliciting, negotiating, or effecting contracts of insurance, or acting in the capacity of various types of insurance agents, unless the person holds a valid license from the Insurance Commissioner authorizing the person to act in that capacity. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to deny an application for a license for various reasons including if the applicant committed a felony or a misdemeanor as shown by a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. Existing law also requires an applicant to pass the qualifying examination for the license prior to receiving a permanent license and allows the applicant to retake the qualifying examination subject to reasonable time limits limiting when a person who has failed the examination may retake. This bill would add that the commissioner may deny an application for a license if the applicant has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a person who has failed any license qualification examination 10 times within the previous 12-month period from enrolling in any further license qualification examinations for a period of 12 months. (4) Existing law requires a person who is licensed in this state as an insurance agent or broker, advertises insurance on the Internet, and transacts insurance in this state, to identify certain information on the Internet, regardless of whether the insurance agent or broker maintains his or her Internet presence or if the presence is maintained on his or her behalf. The required information includes, but is not limited to, his or her name as it appears on his or her license, and any fictitious name approved by the commissioner. This bill would instead require that the person provide his or her name as filed with the commissioner that has not been disapproved pursuant to the provisions regarding the use of fictitious names. (5) Existing law prohibits an insurer from executing an undertaking of bail except by and through a person holding a bail license, as provided. Existing law also prohibits the commissioner from suspending or revoking any license, issued as specified, without first granting a hearing, as specified. This bill would prohibit the commissioner from denying a license to an applicant without first granting a hearing, as specified. (6) Existing law provides that for the purpose of determining certain benefits, that in the case of annuity contracts under which an election may be made to have annuity payments commence at optional maturity dates, the maturity date shall be deemed to be the latest date for which election is permitted by the contract. This bill would add that in the case of annuity contracts under which the fixed maturity date is later than the later of the anniversary of the contract next following the annuitant's 70th birthday or the 10th anniversary of the contract, the maturity date shall be deemed to be the later of the anniversary of the contract next following the annuitant's 70th birthday or the 10th anniversary of the contract. (7) Existing law requires the commissioner to annually prepare a consumer rate guide for long-term care insurance and to include specified information, including a history of the rates of all policies issued in California for the current year and for the 4 preceding years. This bill would require the history of the rates of all policies issued in California to be listed for the 9 preceding years. (8) Existing law provides for the regulation of insurers, including insurers issuing policies of long-term care insurance, by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law prohibits an insurer from increasing the premium for an individual or group long-term care insurance policy or certificate approved for sale unless the insurer has received prior approval for the increase from the commissioner and requires the insurer to submit to the commissioner for approval all premium rate schedule increases, as specified. Existing law further requires that approval of all premium rate schedule increases, and approved premium rate schedule increases be subject to various requirements, including filing updated projections annually for the next 3 years, as specified. This bill would require that for the above-described rate schedules, the lifetime expected loss ratio be calculated as specified. The bill would also modify the requirements that approved premium rate schedule increases are subject to by requiring the insurer to file composite rate projections if it is necessary to maintain consistent premium rates for new certificates receiving a rate increase. (9) Existing law requires an insurer, in order to be admitted in this state to transact specified workers' compensation transactions, among other things, to deposit cash instruments or approved interest-bearing securities or approved stocks readily convertible into cash, investment certificates, or share accounts issued by a savings and loan association doing business in this state and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, certificates of deposit, or savings deposits in a bank licensed to do business in this state that is either domiciled in and with its principal place of business in this state or that is a national banking association with a trust office located in this state. This bill would instead include a bank licensed to do business in this state, or a trust company, licensed to do business and located in this state that is either domiciled in and with its principal place of business in this state or that is a national banking association with a trust office located in this state. (10) Existing law requires the Insurance Commissioner to establish a program to investigate complaints and respond to inquiries received regarding the handling of insurance claims and, when warranted, to bring enforcement actions against insurers or production agencies. Existing law requires the commissioner to promulgate a regulation that sets forth the criteria that the department shall apply to determine if a complaint is deemed to be justified prior to the public release of a complaint against a specifically named insurer or production agency. This bill would authorize the commissioner to establish an Internet-accessible complaint response system to distribute and receive complaint information, as specified. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2884?
- AB 2884 is sponsored by Committee on Insurance.
- What is the current status of AB 2884?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2016. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2884?
- Track AB 2884 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2884
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2884
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →