California Environmental Quality Act: transit priority projects.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1886 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1886.
You're tracking AB 1886
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1886 — California Environmental Quality Act: transit priority projects.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA provides for limited CEQA review or exempts from its requirements transit priority projects meeting certain requirements, including the requirement that the project be within 12 mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. CEQA specifies that a project is considered to be within 12 mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor if, among other things, all parcels within the project have no more than 25% of their area farther than 12 mile from the stop or corridor. This bill, for a transit priority project to meet the requirements for limited CEQA review, would increase that percentage to 50%.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/11/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 11, 2016
- Introduced 02/11/16 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2016
- AB1886 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 1. Page 4952.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (May 3).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Primary
- Jeff Gonzalez · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- McCarty
Co-sponsors (2)
- Bloom
- Gonzalez, Jeff Republican
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 69 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 1% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Brown | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Not Voting |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1886 do?
- The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA provides for limited CEQA review or exempts from its requirements transit priority projects meeting certain requirements, including the requirement that the project be within 12 mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. CEQA specifies that a project is considered to be within 12 mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor if, among other things, all parcels within the project have no more than 25% of their area farther than 12 mile from the stop or corridor. This bill, for a transit priority project to meet the requirements for limited CEQA review, would increase that percentage to 50%.
- Who sponsors AB 1886?
- AB 1886 is sponsored by Bloom, McCarty, and Gonzalez, Jeff (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 1886?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1886?
- Track AB 1886 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1886
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1886
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →