County employees' retirement: districts: retirement system governance.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1853 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1853.
You're tracking AB 1853
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1853 — County employees' retirement: districts: retirement system governance.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL) authorizes counties to establish retirement systems pursuant to its provisions in order to provide pension benefits to their employees. CERL defines a district for these purposes, includes specified county retirement systems within that definition, and permits a district to participate in CERL retirement systems. CERL generally provides that the personnel of a county retirement system are county employees, subject to county civil service provisions and salary ordinances, but also authorizes the boards of retirement in specified counties to adopt provisions providing for the appointment of personnel who are to be employees of the retirement system, as well as other administrative provisions that reflect the independence of the retirement system from the county. The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) requires a public retirement system, as defined, to modify its plan or plans to comply with the act and establishes new retirement formulas that a public employer offering a defined benefit pension plan for employees first hired on or after January 1, 2013, may not exceed. PEPRA authorizes individuals who were employed by any public employer before January 1, 2013, and who became employed by a subsequent public employer for the first time on or after January 1, 2013, to be subject to the retirement plan that would have been available to employees of the subsequent employer who were first employed by the subsequent employer on or before December 31, 2012, if the individual was subject to reciprocity, as specified. This bill would authorize the retirement board of any retirement system operating under CERL to elect, by resolution, to be a district under the law. The bill would authorize a board to adopt, by resolution, specified administrative provisions that would classify various personnel of the retirement system as employees of the retirement system and not employees of the county. The bill would require the retirement system to notify, and to meet and discuss with, participating employers in the retirement system, the employees of the system, and an employee organization of the retirement system's intent to exercise this authority at least 60 days before considering a resolution to make these provisions applicable. The bill would grant an employee organization representing people who work for the retirement system, and an unrepresented person who works for the retirement system, the right to elect to be employees of the retirement system, which would be irrevokable, except as specified, and the status of the affected employee positions would remain changed for successor employees. In regard to county employees who would become retirement system employees, the bill would prescribe requirements in connection with their compensation and employment benefits and status. These provisions would include maintaining their county retirement benefits that would otherwise be reduced under PEPRA, keeping their employment classifications, and affording employees the opportunity to continue participation in group health and dental plans, among other plans and programs. The bill would also prescribe requirements regarding labor negotiations and the continuity of labor agreements. The bill would grant a retirement system electing these provisions the authority to adopt the regulations and enter into the agreements necessary to implement them. The bill would require counties to cooperate and act in a timely manner to establish and implement agreements in this regard. The bill would authorize retirement systems currently operating under alternative administrative structures also to adopt these provisions. The bill would also extend this authorization and the associated provisions to a board of investment, as specified. The bill would make technical and conforming changes. (2) CERL authorizes the retirement boards of 5 specified counties to appoint assistant administrators and chief investment officers who, following appointment, are outside county charter, civil service, and merit system rules, except as specified. CERL provides that these administrators and officers are employees of the county, as specified, while serving at the pleasure of the appointing boards, and they may be dismissed without cause. This bill would remove the limitation on these provisions to certain counties, thereby making them applicable to all CERL retirement systems. (3) Existing law permits a board of retirement operating under CERL to issue subpoenas and to compensate persons who are subpoenaed. Existing law permits a board to delegate its subpoena power to a referee or administrator who is appointed pursuant to specified authority. This bill would authorize specified retirement systems operating as districts to delegate the subpoena power, as described above.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/26/16 - Enrolled Current pdf August 26, 2016
- Amended 06/20/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 20, 2016
- Amended 05/11/16 - Amended Assembly pdf May 11, 2016
- Amended 03/29/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 29, 2016
- Introduced 02/10/16 - Introduced pdf February 10, 2016
- AB1853 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 20. Page 6186.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 18 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 4957.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 27).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 21. Page 5049.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (May 4).
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Cooper · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cooper
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 16 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 20 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 25% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 28% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 17 | 0 | 13 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 45 | 21 | 0 | 14 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 26% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Medina | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 0% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1853 do?
- (1) The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL) authorizes counties to establish retirement systems pursuant to its provisions in order to provide pension benefits to their employees. CERL defines a district for these purposes, includes specified county retirement systems within that definition, and permits a district to participate in CERL retirement systems. CERL generally provides that the personnel of a county retirement system are county employees, subject to county civil service provisions and salary ordinances, but also authorizes the boards of retirement in specified counties to adopt provisions providing for the appointment of personnel who are to be employees of the retirement system, as well as other administrative provisions that reflect the independence of the retirement system from the county. The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) requires a public retirement system, as defined, to modify its plan or plans to comply with the act and establishes new retirement formulas that a public employer offering a defined benefit pension plan for employees first hired on or after January 1, 2013, may not exceed. PEPRA authorizes individuals who were employed by any public employer before January 1, 2013, and who became employed by a subsequent public employer for the first time on or after January 1, 2013, to be subject to the retirement plan that would have been available to employees of the subsequent employer who were first employed by the subsequent employer on or before December 31, 2012, if the individual was subject to reciprocity, as specified. This bill would authorize the retirement board of any retirement system operating under CERL to elect, by resolution, to be a district under the law. The bill would authorize a board to adopt, by resolution, specified administrative provisions that would classify various personnel of the retirement system as employees of the retirement system and not employees of the county. The bill would require the retirement system to notify, and to meet and discuss with, participating employers in the retirement system, the employees of the system, and an employee organization of the retirement system's intent to exercise this authority at least 60 days before considering a resolution to make these provisions applicable. The bill would grant an employee organization representing people who work for the retirement system, and an unrepresented person who works for the retirement system, the right to elect to be employees of the retirement system, which would be irrevokable, except as specified, and the status of the affected employee positions would remain changed for successor employees. In regard to county employees who would become retirement system employees, the bill would prescribe requirements in connection with their compensation and employment benefits and status. These provisions would include maintaining their county retirement benefits that would otherwise be reduced under PEPRA, keeping their employment classifications, and affording employees the opportunity to continue participation in group health and dental plans, among other plans and programs. The bill would also prescribe requirements regarding labor negotiations and the continuity of labor agreements. The bill would grant a retirement system electing these provisions the authority to adopt the regulations and enter into the agreements necessary to implement them. The bill would require counties to cooperate and act in a timely manner to establish and implement agreements in this regard. The bill would authorize retirement systems currently operating under alternative administrative structures also to adopt these provisions. The bill would also extend this authorization and the associated provisions to a board of investment, as specified. The bill would make technical and conforming changes. (2) CERL authorizes the retirement boards of 5 specified counties to appoint assistant administrators and chief investment officers who, following appointment, are outside county charter, civil service, and merit system rules, except as specified. CERL provides that these administrators and officers are employees of the county, as specified, while serving at the pleasure of the appointing boards, and they may be dismissed without cause. This bill would remove the limitation on these provisions to certain counties, thereby making them applicable to all CERL retirement systems. (3) Existing law permits a board of retirement operating under CERL to issue subpoenas and to compensate persons who are subpoenaed. Existing law permits a board to delegate its subpoena power to a referee or administrator who is appointed pursuant to specified authority. This bill would authorize specified retirement systems operating as districts to delegate the subpoena power, as described above.
- Who sponsors AB 1853?
- AB 1853 is sponsored by Cooper.
- What is the current status of AB 1853?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1853?
- Track AB 1853 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1853
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1853
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →