California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 552 — Public water systems: disadvantaged communities: consolidation or extension of service: administrative and managerial services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 773, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 12 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, provides for the operation of public water systems and imposes on the State Water Resources Control Board various responsibilities and duties. The act authorizes the state board to order consolidation with a receiving water system where a public water system, or a state small water system within a disadvantaged community, consistently fails to provide an adequate supply of safe drinking water. The act authorizes the state board to order the extension of service to an area that does not have access to an adequate supply of safe drinking water so long as the extension of service is an interim extension of service in preparation for consolidation. Existing law, for these purposes, defines "disadvantaged community" to mean a disadvantaged community that is in an unincorporated area or is served by a mutual water company. This bill would authorize the state board to order consolidation where a public water system or a state small water system is serving, rather than within, a disadvantaged community, and would limit the authority of the state board to order consolidation or extension of service to provide that authority only with regard to a disadvantaged community. This bill would make a community disadvantaged for these purposes if the community is in a mobilehome park, even if it is not in an unincorporated area or served by a mutual water company. The act requires the state board, before ordering consolidation or extension of service, to take certain actions, including consulting with specified entities, to hold at least one initial public meeting, as specified, and to obtain written consent from any domestic well owner for consolidation or extension of service. The act provides that any affected resident within the consolidation or extended service area who does not provide written consent is ineligible, until consent is provided, for any future water-related grant funding from the state, except as specified. This bill would also require the state board, before ordering consolidation or extension of service, to consult with public water systems in the chain of distribution of the potentially receiving water system. The bill would provide that an initial public meeting is not required for a potentially subsumed area that is served only by domestic wells. The bill would apply to the domestic well owner, instead of to an affected resident, within the consolidation or extended service area the written consent requirement for eligibility for water-related grant funding. The act requires the state board, upon ordering the consolidation or extension of service, to adequately compensate the owners of a privately owned subsumed water system for the fair market value of the system as determined by the Public Utilities Commission for water corporations subject to the commission's jurisdiction or the state board for all other systems. The act prohibits a consolidated water system from increasing charges on existing customers of the receiving water system solely as a consequence of the consolidation or extension of service unless the customer receives a corresponding benefit. This bill would instead authorize the Public Utilities Commission or the state board to determine the fair market value of a subsumed water system, without regard to whether the system is a water corporation subject to the commission's jurisdiction. The bill would prohibit fees or charges imposed on a customer of a subsumed water system from exceeding the cost of consolidating the water system or the cost of extension of service to the area. The act exempts the consolidation or extension of service pursuant to these provisions from the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, which governs the procedures for the formation and change of organization of cities and special districts. This bill would instead exempt an action taken by the state board pursuant to these provisions from the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. This bill would authorize the state board, for the purpose of providing affordable, safe drinking water to disadvantaged communities and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse, to contract with an administrator to provide administrative and managerial services to a designated water system and to order the designated public water system to accept those services if sufficient funding is available and if the state board makes a certain finding. The bill would define designated water system as a public water system that serves a disadvantaged community and that the state board finds consistently fails to provide an adequate and affordable supply of safe drinking water. The bill would require the state board to provide a public water system with notice, as specified, and to conduct a public meeting, as specified, before determining that the public water system is a designated public water system. The bill would authorize the administrator of a designated public water system to expend available moneys for capital infrastructure improvements that the designated public water system needs to provide an adequate and affordable supply of safe drinking water, to set and collect user water rates and fees, and to expend available moneys for the operation and maintenance costs of the designated public water system. The bill would require the state board to work with the administrator of the public water system and the communities served by that designated public water system to develop, within the shortest feasible timeframe, adequate technical, managerial, and financial capacity to deliver safe drinking water so that the services of the administrator are no longer necessary. The bill would not apply these administrator provisions to a charter city, charter county, or charter city and county. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 116681 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 1611 and SB 839 that would become operative if this bill and one or both of those bills are enacted and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 773, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 5494.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 5456.)

  6. Set for hearing August 26.

  7. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 5326.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).

  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 50. Noes 28. Page 6130.) Ordered to the Senate.

  11. Ordered to third reading.

  12. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 50. Noes 21. Page 5990.)

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 11).

  16. August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  17. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on W., P., & W. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 14).

  21. From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and W., P., & W. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 27). Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  23. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  24. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  25. Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  26. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  27. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 5. Page 1205.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  28. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  29. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1156.) (May 28).

  30. Set for hearing May 28.

  31. May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  32. Set for hearing May 11.

  33. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 858.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  34. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

  35. Set for hearing April 29.

  36. April 15 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  37. Set for hearing April 15.

  38. Referred to Com. on E.Q.

  39. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 29.

  40. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wolk · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 25 Yea · 13 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231201
Democratic 2100
Total 251301
% of votes cast 64%33%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leno — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Not Voting
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 50 Yea · 28 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452302
Democratic 5000
Republican 0500
Total 502802
% of votes cast 63%35%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Frazier — Not Voting
Chang — Nay
Gray — Not Voting
Harper — Nay
Kim — Nay
Levine — Yea
Baker — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Linder — Nay
Mayes — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Williams — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Burke — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 50 Yea · 21 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 451609
Democratic 5000
Republican 0500
Total 502109
% of votes cast 63%26%0%11%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Kim — Not Voting
Linder — Nay
Low — Yea
Mathis — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Olsen — Nay
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Medina — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gray — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Harper — Nay
Holden — Not Voting
Levine — Yea
Burke — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Campos — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chang — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Wood — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Hadley — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 11 Yea · 4 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10303
Democratic 1001
Republican 0101
Total 11405
% of votes cast 55%20%0%25%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Obernolte — Nay
Santiago — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Chang — Nay
Daly — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10400
Republican 0100
Total 10500
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Levine — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Dodd — Yea
Harper — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Williams — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8001
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Brough — Not Voting
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Chang — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Holden — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 31 Yea · 5 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 28504
Democratic 3000
Total 31504
% of votes cast 78%13%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Not Voting
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Block — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Nielsen — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5002
Total 5002
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Lara — Yea
Beall — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 552 do?
Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, provides for the operation of public water systems and imposes on the State Water Resources Control Board various responsibilities and duties. The act authorizes the state board to order consolidation with a receiving water system where a public water system, or a state small water system within a disadvantaged community, consistently fails to provide an adequate supply of safe drinking water. The act authorizes the state board to order the extension of service to an area that does not have access to an adequate supply of safe drinking water so long as the extension of service is an interim extension of service in preparation for consolidation. Existing law, for these purposes, defines "disadvantaged community" to mean a disadvantaged community that is in an unincorporated area or is served by a mutual water company. This bill would authorize the state board to order consolidation where a public water system or a state small water system is serving, rather than within, a disadvantaged community, and would limit the authority of the state board to order consolidation or extension of service to provide that authority only with regard to a disadvantaged community. This bill would make a community disadvantaged for these purposes if the community is in a mobilehome park, even if it is not in an unincorporated area or served by a mutual water company. The act requires the state board, before ordering consolidation or extension of service, to take certain actions, including consulting with specified entities, to hold at least one initial public meeting, as specified, and to obtain written consent from any domestic well owner for consolidation or extension of service. The act provides that any affected resident within the consolidation or extended service area who does not provide written consent is ineligible, until consent is provided, for any future water-related grant funding from the state, except as specified. This bill would also require the state board, before ordering consolidation or extension of service, to consult with public water systems in the chain of distribution of the potentially receiving water system. The bill would provide that an initial public meeting is not required for a potentially subsumed area that is served only by domestic wells. The bill would apply to the domestic well owner, instead of to an affected resident, within the consolidation or extended service area the written consent requirement for eligibility for water-related grant funding. The act requires the state board, upon ordering the consolidation or extension of service, to adequately compensate the owners of a privately owned subsumed water system for the fair market value of the system as determined by the Public Utilities Commission for water corporations subject to the commission's jurisdiction or the state board for all other systems. The act prohibits a consolidated water system from increasing charges on existing customers of the receiving water system solely as a consequence of the consolidation or extension of service unless the customer receives a corresponding benefit. This bill would instead authorize the Public Utilities Commission or the state board to determine the fair market value of a subsumed water system, without regard to whether the system is a water corporation subject to the commission's jurisdiction. The bill would prohibit fees or charges imposed on a customer of a subsumed water system from exceeding the cost of consolidating the water system or the cost of extension of service to the area. The act exempts the consolidation or extension of service pursuant to these provisions from the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, which governs the procedures for the formation and change of organization of cities and special districts. This bill would instead exempt an action taken by the state board pursuant to these provisions from the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. This bill would authorize the state board, for the purpose of providing affordable, safe drinking water to disadvantaged communities and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse, to contract with an administrator to provide administrative and managerial services to a designated water system and to order the designated public water system to accept those services if sufficient funding is available and if the state board makes a certain finding. The bill would define designated water system as a public water system that serves a disadvantaged community and that the state board finds consistently fails to provide an adequate and affordable supply of safe drinking water. The bill would require the state board to provide a public water system with notice, as specified, and to conduct a public meeting, as specified, before determining that the public water system is a designated public water system. The bill would authorize the administrator of a designated public water system to expend available moneys for capital infrastructure improvements that the designated public water system needs to provide an adequate and affordable supply of safe drinking water, to set and collect user water rates and fees, and to expend available moneys for the operation and maintenance costs of the designated public water system. The bill would require the state board to work with the administrator of the public water system and the communities served by that designated public water system to develop, within the shortest feasible timeframe, adequate technical, managerial, and financial capacity to deliver safe drinking water so that the services of the administrator are no longer necessary. The bill would not apply these administrator provisions to a charter city, charter county, or charter city and county. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 116681 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 1611 and SB 839 that would become operative if this bill and one or both of those bills are enacted and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors SB 552?
SB 552 is sponsored by Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 552?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 552?
Track SB 552 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 552

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 552

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →