AB 2002 — Political Reform Act of 1974: California Coastal Commission: communications.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Allen.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California Coastal Commission in the Natural Resources Agency and designates the commission as the state coastal zone planning and management agency for all purposes. Existing law prohibits a commission member or an interested person, as defined, from conducting an ex parte communication unless the commission member fully discloses and makes public that communication within 7 days after the communication or, if the communication occurs within 7 days of the next commission hearing, to the commission on the record of the proceeding at that hearing. This bill would require a commission member to fully disclose in writing 24 hours before a commission hearing any ex parte communication conducted within 7 days of the commission hearing relating to a matter that will be discussed at the hearing, and would prohibit a commission member or an interested person from conducting such an ex parte communication within 24 hours before the commission hearing. The Political Reform Act of 1974 provides for the regulation of the lobbying industry, including defining the term "lobbyist" and regulating the conduct of lobbyists. Among its provisions, the act prohibits lobbyists from engaging in certain activities, including accepting or agreeing to accept any payment in any way contingent upon the defeat, enactment, or outcome of any proposed legislative or administrative action. Under the act, a lobbyist is, among others, an individual whose principal duties as an employee are to communicate with, among others, any agency official for the purpose of influencing legislative or administrative action. For these purposes, "administrative action" is defined as the proposal, drafting, development, consideration, amendment, enactment, or defeat by a state agency of any rule, regulation, or other action in any ratemaking or quasi-legislative proceeding and "agency official" is defined as any member, officer, employee, or consultant of any state agency who participates in any administrative action in other than a ministerial capacity. This bill would revise the definition of "administrative action" to include, with regard to proceedings before the California Coastal Commission, specified actions relating to the review, approval, and appeal of certain permit actions and coastal plans and programs. The bill would, however, exclude from these provisions relating to lobbyists an employee of a local government agency seeking, within the scope of his or her employment, to influence quasi-judicial decisions of the commission. The bill would also, for purposes of those matters before the California Coastal Commission, limit the definition of "agency official" to a member of the commission. Existing law makes a knowing and willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding those crimes. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes with a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/12/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 12, 2016
- Amended 03/28/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2016
- Introduced 02/16/16 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2016
- AB2002 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Allen.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5575.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Allen.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 22. Noes 13. Page 5575.).
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
(Ayes 26. Noes 13. Page 5510.)
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on N.R. & W. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and N.R. & W.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 23. Page 5247.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 27).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (March 30). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on E. & R. and NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Alejo · Cosponsor
- Block · Cosponsor
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- Atkins · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Gordon · Cosponsor
- Jones-Sawyer · Cosponsor
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Levine · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- Monning · Cosponsor
- O'Donnell · Cosponsor
- Pavley · Cosponsor
- Rendon · Cosponsor
- Thurmond · Cosponsor
- Ting · Cosponsor
- Weber · Cosponsor
- Jeff Gonzalez · Cosponsor
- Williams · Cosponsor
- Wood · Cosponsor
- Wolk · Cosponsor
- Corey A. Jackson · Cosponsor
- Travis Allen · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 23 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mark Stone Voted No
Co-sponsors (23)
- Alejo
- Block
- Bloom
- Atkins
- Chiu
- Gordon
- Jones-Sawyer
- Leno
- Levine
- McCarty
- Monning
- O'Donnell
- Pavley
- Rendon
- Thurmond
- Ting
- Weber
- Gonzalez, Jeff Republican
- Williams
- Wood
- Wolk
- Jackson, Corey A. Democratic
- Travis Allen Voted No
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 12 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 19 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 54 | 23 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 29% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Low | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2002 do?
- Existing law establishes the California Coastal Commission in the Natural Resources Agency and designates the commission as the state coastal zone planning and management agency for all purposes. Existing law prohibits a commission member or an interested person, as defined, from conducting an ex parte communication unless the commission member fully discloses and makes public that communication within 7 days after the communication or, if the communication occurs within 7 days of the next commission hearing, to the commission on the record of the proceeding at that hearing. This bill would require a commission member to fully disclose in writing 24 hours before a commission hearing any ex parte communication conducted within 7 days of the commission hearing relating to a matter that will be discussed at the hearing, and would prohibit a commission member or an interested person from conducting such an ex parte communication within 24 hours before the commission hearing. The Political Reform Act of 1974 provides for the regulation of the lobbying industry, including defining the term "lobbyist" and regulating the conduct of lobbyists. Among its provisions, the act prohibits lobbyists from engaging in certain activities, including accepting or agreeing to accept any payment in any way contingent upon the defeat, enactment, or outcome of any proposed legislative or administrative action. Under the act, a lobbyist is, among others, an individual whose principal duties as an employee are to communicate with, among others, any agency official for the purpose of influencing legislative or administrative action. For these purposes, "administrative action" is defined as the proposal, drafting, development, consideration, amendment, enactment, or defeat by a state agency of any rule, regulation, or other action in any ratemaking or quasi-legislative proceeding and "agency official" is defined as any member, officer, employee, or consultant of any state agency who participates in any administrative action in other than a ministerial capacity. This bill would revise the definition of "administrative action" to include, with regard to proceedings before the California Coastal Commission, specified actions relating to the review, approval, and appeal of certain permit actions and coastal plans and programs. The bill would, however, exclude from these provisions relating to lobbyists an employee of a local government agency seeking, within the scope of his or her employment, to influence quasi-judicial decisions of the commission. The bill would also, for purposes of those matters before the California Coastal Commission, limit the definition of "agency official" to a member of the commission. Existing law makes a knowing and willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding those crimes. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes with a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2002?
- AB 2002 is sponsored by Alejo, Block, Bloom, Atkins, Chiu, Gordon, Jones-Sawyer, Leno, Levine, McCarty, Monning, O'Donnell, Pavley, Rendon, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Gonzalez, Jeff (Republican), Williams, Wood, Wolk, Jackson, Corey A. (Democratic), Travis Allen, and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of AB 2002?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2002?
- Track AB 2002 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2002
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2002
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →