California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 586 — Children's services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 625, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 10 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

The California Children's Services (CCS) program is a statewide program providing medically necessary services required by physically handicapped children whose parents are unable to pay for those services. The State Department of Health Care Services administers the CCS program. Counties, based on population size, are also charged with administering the program, either independently or jointly with the department. The services covered by the CCS program include expert diagnosis, medical treatment, surgical treatment, hospital care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, special treatment, materials, and the supply of appliances and their upkeep, maintenance, and transportation. Funding for the program comes from county, state, and federal sources. In order to be eligible for the CCS program, an applicant must be under 21 years of age, have or be suspected of having a condition covered by the program, and meet certain financial eligibility standards established by the department. Existing law prohibits services covered by the CCS program from being incorporated into a Medi-Cal managed care contract entered into after August 1, 1994, until January 1, 2017, except with respect to contracts entered into for county organized health systems or Regional Health Authority in specified counties. This bill would exempt contracts entered into under the Whole Child Model program, described below, from that prohibition and would extend to January 1, 2022, and until the evaluation required under the Whole Child Model program has been completed, the termination of the prohibition against CCS-covered services being incorporated in a Medi-Cal managed care contract entered into after August 1, 1994. The bill would authorize the department, no sooner than July 1, 2017, to establish a Whole Child Model program, under which managed care plans served by a county organized health system or Regional Health Authority in designated counties would provide CCS services to Medi-Cal eligible CCS children and youth. The bill would limit the number of managed care plans under a county organized health system or Regional Health Authority that are eligible to participate in the program. The bill would require the department to implement the program, as specified, and would require a managed care plan to obtain written approval from the department and establish a local stakeholder process, as prescribed. The bill would prohibit the department from approving the application of a managed care plan until the Director of Health Care Services has verified the readiness of the managed care plan to address the unique needs of CCS-eligible beneficiaries, including, among other things, that the managed care contractor demonstrates the availability of an appropriate provider network to serve the needs of children and youth with CCS conditions and complies with all CCS program guidelines. The bill would prohibit the department from implementing the program in any county until it has developed specific CCS monitoring and oversight standards for managed care plans. The bill would require the department to establish, through December 31, 2021, a statewide Whole Child Model program stakeholder advisory group comprised of specified stakeholders, including representatives from health plans and family resource centers, or modify an existing stakeholder advisory group and would require the department to consult with the Whole Child Model program stakeholder advisory group on the implementation of the program, as specified. The bill would impose various requirements on a Medi-Cal managed care plan serving children and youth with CCS-eligible conditions under the CCS program, including, but not limited to, coordinating services, as specified; providing appropriate access to care, services, and information, including continuity of care requirements; and providing for case management, care coordination, provider referral, and service authorization services. The bill would require a Medi-Cal managed care plan participating in the Whole Child Model program to ensure provision of case management, care coordination, provider referral, and service authorization services to children and youth, as prescribed, but would authorize the department to waive this requirement if the plan demonstrates that it cannot meet the requirement because it would result in substantially increased program costs, as specified. This bill would require a managed care plan to provide a timely process for accepting and acting upon complaints and grievances of CCS-eligible children and youth. The bill would require a specified stakeholder process to address proposed changes to CCS medical eligibility requirements. The bill would require the department to contract with an independent entity to conduct an evaluation to assess health plan performance and the outcomes and the experience of CCS-eligible children and youth participating in the program, and would require the department to provide a report on the results of this evaluation to the Legislature no later than January 1, 2021. This bill would provide that its provisions are not intended to permit any reduction in benefits or eligibility levels under the existing CCS program. The bill would require the department, by July 1, 2020, to adopt regulations and, commencing July 1, 2018, would require the department to provide a status report to the Legislature until regulations have been adopted. The bill would authorize the Director of Health Care Services to enter into exclusive or nonexclusive contracts on a bid, nonbid, or negotiated basis and amend existing managed care contracts to provide or arrange for services provided under the bill. By imposing new duties on counties with respect to the transition and implementation of CCS program services, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 625, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5474.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 5437.)

  6. Set for hearing August 25.

  7. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 5326.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).

  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6079.) Ordered to the Senate.

  11. Ordered to third reading.

  12. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5956.)

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (August 11).

  15. Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.

  16. August 10 set for second hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  17. August 3 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  18. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 28).

  21. June 21 set for second hearing canceled at the request of author.

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  23. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  24. July 14 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  25. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  26. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  27. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1207.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  28. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  29. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1156.) (May 28).

  30. Set for hearing May 28.

  31. May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  32. Set for hearing May 11.

  33. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  34. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 758.) (April 22).

  35. Set for hearing April 22.

  36. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  37. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 29.

  38. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alejo · Cosponsor
  • Bonta · Cosponsor
  • Chávez · Cosponsor
  • Hernandez · Primary
  • Wood · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hernandez

Co-sponsors (4)

  • Alejo
  • Bonta
  • Chávez
  • Wood

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36000
Democratic 3000
Total 39000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Allen — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70000
Democratic 5000
Republican 5000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Low — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kim — Yea
Chang — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wood — Yea
Harper — Yea
Burke — Yea
Salas — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 73 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 63007
Democratic 5000
Republican 5000
Total 73007
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Daly — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Burke — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Chang — Yea
Kim — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Harper — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Gray — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dodd — Not Voting
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 20 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 2000
Republican 2000
Total 20000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Holden — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chang — Yea
Daly — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 17000
Total 18000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Wood — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37000
Democratic 3000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Pan — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Runner — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Mendoza — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 586 do?
The California Children's Services (CCS) program is a statewide program providing medically necessary services required by physically handicapped children whose parents are unable to pay for those services. The State Department of Health Care Services administers the CCS program. Counties, based on population size, are also charged with administering the program, either independently or jointly with the department. The services covered by the CCS program include expert diagnosis, medical treatment, surgical treatment, hospital care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, special treatment, materials, and the supply of appliances and their upkeep, maintenance, and transportation. Funding for the program comes from county, state, and federal sources. In order to be eligible for the CCS program, an applicant must be under 21 years of age, have or be suspected of having a condition covered by the program, and meet certain financial eligibility standards established by the department. Existing law prohibits services covered by the CCS program from being incorporated into a Medi-Cal managed care contract entered into after August 1, 1994, until January 1, 2017, except with respect to contracts entered into for county organized health systems or Regional Health Authority in specified counties. This bill would exempt contracts entered into under the Whole Child Model program, described below, from that prohibition and would extend to January 1, 2022, and until the evaluation required under the Whole Child Model program has been completed, the termination of the prohibition against CCS-covered services being incorporated in a Medi-Cal managed care contract entered into after August 1, 1994. The bill would authorize the department, no sooner than July 1, 2017, to establish a Whole Child Model program, under which managed care plans served by a county organized health system or Regional Health Authority in designated counties would provide CCS services to Medi-Cal eligible CCS children and youth. The bill would limit the number of managed care plans under a county organized health system or Regional Health Authority that are eligible to participate in the program. The bill would require the department to implement the program, as specified, and would require a managed care plan to obtain written approval from the department and establish a local stakeholder process, as prescribed. The bill would prohibit the department from approving the application of a managed care plan until the Director of Health Care Services has verified the readiness of the managed care plan to address the unique needs of CCS-eligible beneficiaries, including, among other things, that the managed care contractor demonstrates the availability of an appropriate provider network to serve the needs of children and youth with CCS conditions and complies with all CCS program guidelines. The bill would prohibit the department from implementing the program in any county until it has developed specific CCS monitoring and oversight standards for managed care plans. The bill would require the department to establish, through December 31, 2021, a statewide Whole Child Model program stakeholder advisory group comprised of specified stakeholders, including representatives from health plans and family resource centers, or modify an existing stakeholder advisory group and would require the department to consult with the Whole Child Model program stakeholder advisory group on the implementation of the program, as specified. The bill would impose various requirements on a Medi-Cal managed care plan serving children and youth with CCS-eligible conditions under the CCS program, including, but not limited to, coordinating services, as specified; providing appropriate access to care, services, and information, including continuity of care requirements; and providing for case management, care coordination, provider referral, and service authorization services. The bill would require a Medi-Cal managed care plan participating in the Whole Child Model program to ensure provision of case management, care coordination, provider referral, and service authorization services to children and youth, as prescribed, but would authorize the department to waive this requirement if the plan demonstrates that it cannot meet the requirement because it would result in substantially increased program costs, as specified. This bill would require a managed care plan to provide a timely process for accepting and acting upon complaints and grievances of CCS-eligible children and youth. The bill would require a specified stakeholder process to address proposed changes to CCS medical eligibility requirements. The bill would require the department to contract with an independent entity to conduct an evaluation to assess health plan performance and the outcomes and the experience of CCS-eligible children and youth participating in the program, and would require the department to provide a report on the results of this evaluation to the Legislature no later than January 1, 2021. This bill would provide that its provisions are not intended to permit any reduction in benefits or eligibility levels under the existing CCS program. The bill would require the department, by July 1, 2020, to adopt regulations and, commencing July 1, 2018, would require the department to provide a status report to the Legislature until regulations have been adopted. The bill would authorize the Director of Health Care Services to enter into exclusive or nonexclusive contracts on a bid, nonbid, or negotiated basis and amend existing managed care contracts to provide or arrange for services provided under the bill. By imposing new duties on counties with respect to the transition and implementation of CCS program services, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors SB 586?
SB 586 is sponsored by Alejo, Bonta, Chávez, Hernandez, and Wood.
What is the current status of SB 586?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 586?
Track SB 586 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 586

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 586

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →