AB 1509 — Employer liability.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 792, Statutes of 2015.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2015. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits an employer from discharging an employee or in any manner discriminating, retaliating, or taking any adverse action against any employee or applicant for employment because the employee or applicant has engaged in protected conduct, as specified. Existing law provides that an employee who made a bona fide complaint, and was consequently discharged or otherwise suffered an adverse action, is entitled to reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for an employer to willfully refuse to reinstate or otherwise restore an employee who is determined by a specified procedure to be eligible for reinstatement. Existing law subjects a person who violates these provisions to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation. This bill would extend the protections of these provisions, as specified, to an employee who is a family member of a person who engaged in, or was perceived to engage in, the protected conduct or make a complaint protected by these provisions. This bill would define terms for the purpose of these provisions. (2) Existing law requires a client employer to share with a labor contractor all civil legal responsibility and civil liability for all workers supplied by that labor contractor for the payment of wages and the failure to obtain valid workers' compensation coverage. Existing law also prohibits a client employer from shifting to the labor contractor legal duties or liabilities under workplace safety provisions with respect to workers provided by the labor contractor. Existing law defines terms for these purposes and authorizes the Labor Commissioner to adopt regulations and rules of practice and procedure necessary to administer and enforce these provisions. Existing law excludes certain types of employers from these provisions, including, but not limited to, a client employer that is not a motor carrier of property based solely on the employer's use of a third-party motor carrier of property with interstate or intrastate operating authority to ship or receive freight, and a client employer that is a motor carrier of property subcontracting with, or otherwise engaging, another motor carrier of property to provide transportation services using its own employees and commercial motor vehicles. The Household Goods Carriers Act subjects household goods carriers to the jurisdiction and control of the Public Utilities Commission. The act prohibits a household goods carrier from engaging, or attempting to engage, in the business of the transportation of used household goods and personal effects by motor vehicle over any public highway in the state without a permit issued by the commission authorizing transportation entirely within the state, or a valid operating authority issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration for interstate transportation. This bill would expand the types of employers excluded from those labor contracting provisions to include a client employer that is not a household goods carrier based solely on the employer's use of a third-party household goods carrier permitted by the commission to move household goods, and a client employer that is a permitted household goods carrier subcontracting with, or otherwise engaging, another permitted household goods carrier to provide transportation of household goods using its own employees and motor vehicles.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2015
- Enrolled 09/09/15 - Enrolled pdf September 09, 2015
- Amended 08/31/15 - Amended Senate pdf August 31, 2015
- Amended 04/27/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 27, 2015
- Amended 03/26/15 - Amended Assembly pdf March 26, 2015
- Introduced 03/04/15 - Introduced pdf March 04, 2015
- AB1509 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 792, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 2906.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 13. Page 2411.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 13).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 26. Page 1440.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 6).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 22).
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee April 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Roger Hernández · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 21 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 31% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1509 do?
- (1) Existing law prohibits an employer from discharging an employee or in any manner discriminating, retaliating, or taking any adverse action against any employee or applicant for employment because the employee or applicant has engaged in protected conduct, as specified. Existing law provides that an employee who made a bona fide complaint, and was consequently discharged or otherwise suffered an adverse action, is entitled to reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for an employer to willfully refuse to reinstate or otherwise restore an employee who is determined by a specified procedure to be eligible for reinstatement. Existing law subjects a person who violates these provisions to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation. This bill would extend the protections of these provisions, as specified, to an employee who is a family member of a person who engaged in, or was perceived to engage in, the protected conduct or make a complaint protected by these provisions. This bill would define terms for the purpose of these provisions. (2) Existing law requires a client employer to share with a labor contractor all civil legal responsibility and civil liability for all workers supplied by that labor contractor for the payment of wages and the failure to obtain valid workers' compensation coverage. Existing law also prohibits a client employer from shifting to the labor contractor legal duties or liabilities under workplace safety provisions with respect to workers provided by the labor contractor. Existing law defines terms for these purposes and authorizes the Labor Commissioner to adopt regulations and rules of practice and procedure necessary to administer and enforce these provisions. Existing law excludes certain types of employers from these provisions, including, but not limited to, a client employer that is not a motor carrier of property based solely on the employer's use of a third-party motor carrier of property with interstate or intrastate operating authority to ship or receive freight, and a client employer that is a motor carrier of property subcontracting with, or otherwise engaging, another motor carrier of property to provide transportation services using its own employees and commercial motor vehicles. The Household Goods Carriers Act subjects household goods carriers to the jurisdiction and control of the Public Utilities Commission. The act prohibits a household goods carrier from engaging, or attempting to engage, in the business of the transportation of used household goods and personal effects by motor vehicle over any public highway in the state without a permit issued by the commission authorizing transportation entirely within the state, or a valid operating authority issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration for interstate transportation. This bill would expand the types of employers excluded from those labor contracting provisions to include a client employer that is not a household goods carrier based solely on the employer's use of a third-party household goods carrier permitted by the commission to move household goods, and a client employer that is a permitted household goods carrier subcontracting with, or otherwise engaging, another permitted household goods carrier to provide transportation of household goods using its own employees and motor vehicles.
- Who sponsors AB 1509?
- AB 1509 is sponsored by Roger Hernández.
- What is the current status of AB 1509?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1509?
- Track AB 1509 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1509
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1509
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →