Escrow agents.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 736 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 736.
You're tracking SB 736
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 736 — Escrow agents.
Last action — August 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Escrow Law requires the licensing of escrow agents by the Commissioner of Business Oversight, and further requires licensees to participate as members of the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation, a nonprofit corporation established to pay members for loss of trust fund obligations, as specified. The law requires a licensed escrow agent to maintain a bond based on the previous year's average annual trust fund obligations, as specified. This bill would make findings and declarations regarding the role of Fidelity Corporation to support and enhance trust in licensed escrow agents, and specify that Fidelity Corporation is required to indemnify a member escrow agent against loss in accordance with the Escrow Law. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature for the commissioner to utilize the services of private 3rd parties, with prior escrow or escrow conservation, liquidation, or receivership experience, who are independent of the department to perform conservation, liquidation, and receiver functions, and would require the full amount of any penalty revenue, up to $125,000 at any one time, as specified, to be available for use by the commissioner to compensate an appointed conservator, liquidator, or receiver. The bill would also authorize the commissioner to utilize all or a portion of the bond or other required obligations, and all or a portion of a licensee's assets remaining following conservation, liquidation, or receivership to compensate an appointed conservator, liquidator, or receiver. By making this penalty revenue and other revenue available to the commissioner in this regard, this bill would make an appropriation.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/05/15 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 05, 2015
- Introduced 02/27/15 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2015
- SB736 View text html
Action History
-
August 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
July 15 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1248.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1159.) (May 28).
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
May 18 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 813.) (April 29).
-
Set for hearing April 29.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 1.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Block · Cosponsor
- Morrell · Cosponsor
- Vidak · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Vidak
Co-sponsors (2)
- Block
- Morrell
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 736 do?
- The Escrow Law requires the licensing of escrow agents by the Commissioner of Business Oversight, and further requires licensees to participate as members of the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation, a nonprofit corporation established to pay members for loss of trust fund obligations, as specified. The law requires a licensed escrow agent to maintain a bond based on the previous year's average annual trust fund obligations, as specified. This bill would make findings and declarations regarding the role of Fidelity Corporation to support and enhance trust in licensed escrow agents, and specify that Fidelity Corporation is required to indemnify a member escrow agent against loss in accordance with the Escrow Law. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature for the commissioner to utilize the services of private 3rd parties, with prior escrow or escrow conservation, liquidation, or receivership experience, who are independent of the department to perform conservation, liquidation, and receiver functions, and would require the full amount of any penalty revenue, up to $125,000 at any one time, as specified, to be available for use by the commissioner to compensate an appointed conservator, liquidator, or receiver. The bill would also authorize the commissioner to utilize all or a portion of the bond or other required obligations, and all or a portion of a licensee's assets remaining following conservation, liquidation, or receivership to compensate an appointed conservator, liquidator, or receiver. By making this penalty revenue and other revenue available to the commissioner in this regard, this bill would make an appropriation.
- Who sponsors SB 736?
- SB 736 is sponsored by Block, Morrell, and Vidak.
- What is the current status of SB 736?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 736?
- Track SB 736 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 736
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 736
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →