SB 1017 — Public Utilities Commission: public availability of utility supplied documents: judicial review.
Last action — Ordered to third reading.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission with certain general authority over all public utilities, including the authority to establish rules for all public utilities, subject to control by the Legislature. The Public Utilities Act prohibits the commission or an officer or employee of the commission from disclosing any information furnished to the commission by a public utility, a subsidiary, an affiliate, or a corporation holding a controlling interest in a public utility, unless the information is specifically required to be open to public inspection under the act, except on order of the commission or a commissioner in the course of a hearing or proceeding. Existing law provides that any officer or employee of the commission who divulges any such information is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit the commission or an officer or employee of the commission from disclosing any information furnished to the commission by a public utility, a subsidiary, an affiliate, or a corporation holding a controlling interest in a public utility, unless the information is specifically required to be open to public inspection by any provision of state or federal law, rather than only by the Public Utilities Act, except on order of the commission or a commissioner in the course of a hearing or proceeding. The bill would require the commission to provide a party furnishing information to the commission with notice and an opportunity to comment prior to the information being made available for inspection or being made public pursuant to this provision. The bill would require the commission, by July 1, 2018, to adopt a written process for the disclosure or publication of information furnished to the commission pursuant to the Public Utilities Act. The bill would make a present or former officer or employee of the commission guilty of a misdemeanor for divulging information contrary to these provisions only if the officer or employee knowingly and willfully makes the disclosure with the knowledge that the information is not publicly disclosable, or with the knowledge that a substantive provision of law required that the information be kept confidential. The California Constitution grants the Legislature plenary authority, unlimited by the other provisions of the Constitution, to establish the manner and scope of review of commission action in a court of record. The Public Utilities Act provides that no court of the state, except the Supreme Court and the court of appeal, has jurisdiction to review, reverse, correct, or annul any order or decision of the commission or to suspend or delay the execution or operation thereof, or to enjoin, restrain, or interfere with the commission in the performance of its official duties. This bill would authorize an action against the commission arising under the California Public Records Act to be brought in the superior court.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/19/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 19, 2016
- Amended 08/01/16 - Amended Assembly pdf August 01, 2016
- Amended 06/20/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 20, 2016
- Introduced 02/11/16 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2016
- SB1017 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5954.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 10).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) (June 29).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 8. Page 3929.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 2.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3610.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 19.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3311.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing March 29.
-
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hill
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 25% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 33% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 20% | 0% | 28% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 0% | 0% | 45% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1017 do?
- The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission with certain general authority over all public utilities, including the authority to establish rules for all public utilities, subject to control by the Legislature. The Public Utilities Act prohibits the commission or an officer or employee of the commission from disclosing any information furnished to the commission by a public utility, a subsidiary, an affiliate, or a corporation holding a controlling interest in a public utility, unless the information is specifically required to be open to public inspection under the act, except on order of the commission or a commissioner in the course of a hearing or proceeding. Existing law provides that any officer or employee of the commission who divulges any such information is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit the commission or an officer or employee of the commission from disclosing any information furnished to the commission by a public utility, a subsidiary, an affiliate, or a corporation holding a controlling interest in a public utility, unless the information is specifically required to be open to public inspection by any provision of state or federal law, rather than only by the Public Utilities Act, except on order of the commission or a commissioner in the course of a hearing or proceeding. The bill would require the commission to provide a party furnishing information to the commission with notice and an opportunity to comment prior to the information being made available for inspection or being made public pursuant to this provision. The bill would require the commission, by July 1, 2018, to adopt a written process for the disclosure or publication of information furnished to the commission pursuant to the Public Utilities Act. The bill would make a present or former officer or employee of the commission guilty of a misdemeanor for divulging information contrary to these provisions only if the officer or employee knowingly and willfully makes the disclosure with the knowledge that the information is not publicly disclosable, or with the knowledge that a substantive provision of law required that the information be kept confidential. The California Constitution grants the Legislature plenary authority, unlimited by the other provisions of the Constitution, to establish the manner and scope of review of commission action in a court of record. The Public Utilities Act provides that no court of the state, except the Supreme Court and the court of appeal, has jurisdiction to review, reverse, correct, or annul any order or decision of the commission or to suspend or delay the execution or operation thereof, or to enjoin, restrain, or interfere with the commission in the performance of its official duties. This bill would authorize an action against the commission arising under the California Public Records Act to be brought in the superior court.
- Who sponsors SB 1017?
- SB 1017 is sponsored by Hill.
- What is the current status of SB 1017?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1017?
- Track SB 1017 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1017
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1017
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →