California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2693 — Financing requirements: property improvements.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 618, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a public agency, as defined, to determine that it would be convenient, advantageous, and in the public interest to designate an area within which authorized public agency officials and property owners may enter into voluntary contractual assessments to finance certain improvements, including the installation of distributed generation renewable sources, energy or water efficiency improvements, seismic strengthening improvements, or electric vehicle charging infrastructure that are permanently fixed to real property, as specified. Existing law prohibits a public agency from permitting a property owner to participate in any program established pursuant to these provisions if the owner's participation would result in the total amount of any annual property taxes and assessments exceeding 5% of the property's market value, as determined at the time of approval of the owner's contractual assessment. This bill would also prohibit a public agency from permitting a property owner to participate in a program pursuant to these provisions unless the property owner satisfies certain conditions and the property owner is given the right to cancel the contractual assessment at any time prior to midnight on the 3rd business day after certain events occur without penalty or obligation, consistent with certain requirements. The bill would require a financing estimate document or a substantially equivalent document to be completed and delivered to a property owner before the property owner consummates a voluntary contractual assessment pursuant to one of these programs. The bill would prohibit a public agency or other party to a voluntary contractual assessment pursuant to one of these programs to make any monetary or percentage representations of increased value to a property owner regarding the effect the financed improvements will have on the market value of the property unless the public agency or other party derives its estimates of market value using specified methods. This bill would limit these provisions to a property owner who seeks to participate in a program established to finance the installation of distributed generation renewable energy sources, energy or water efficiency improvements, seismic strengthening improvements, or electric vehicle charging infrastructure that are permanently fixed to real property pursuant to these provisions for a residential property with 4 or fewer units. (2) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 specifies the requirements for the establishment of a community facilities district, including, among other things, a petition, a hearing, the establishment of the boundaries of the community facilities district, and an election on the question. Existing law authorizes a community facilities district formed pursuant to an alternative procedure under which the district initially consists solely of territory proposed for annexation to the community facilities district in the future and territory is annexed and subjected to special taxes only upon unanimous approval of the owners, to finance and refinance the acquisition, installation, and improvement of energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy improvements. This bill would require a legislative body to comply with the requirements described above prior to the annexation of a parcel or parcels to a community facilities district formed pursuant to the alternative procedure. The bill would prohibit a parcel or parcels from being annexed to a community facilities district formed pursuant to the alternative procedure if the parcel owner is seeking financing for improvement on a residential property with 4 or fewer units, unless the parcel satisfies specified conditions. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 53328.1 of the Government Code proposed by AB 2618 to be operative only if AB 2618 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 618, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6457.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5346.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 15).

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  14. Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and JUD.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 4894.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  19. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 4).

  20. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  21. Measure version as amended on April 28 corrected.

  22. Read second time and amended.

  23. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 25).

  24. (pending re-refer to Com. on L. GOV.)

  25. Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 4448.)

  26. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  27. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

  28. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.

  29. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

  30. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.

  31. Referred to Com. on B. & F.

  32. Read first time.

  33. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  34. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Dababneh · Primary
  • Hadley · Cosponsor
  • Linder · Cosponsor
  • Travis Allen · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Dababneh

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70000
Democratic 5000
Republican 5000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Harper — Yea
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Medina — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Daly — Yea
Burke — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Chang — Yea
Kim — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Low — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chau — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Campos — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wood — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36000
Democratic 3000
Total 39000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 66004
Democratic 4001
Republican 5000
Total 75005
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Not Voting
Burke — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Harper — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Gray — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Chang — Yea
Chau — Yea
Kim — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chu — Yea
Mathis — Yea
McCarty — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wood — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8000
Republican 1000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2693 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a public agency, as defined, to determine that it would be convenient, advantageous, and in the public interest to designate an area within which authorized public agency officials and property owners may enter into voluntary contractual assessments to finance certain improvements, including the installation of distributed generation renewable sources, energy or water efficiency improvements, seismic strengthening improvements, or electric vehicle charging infrastructure that are permanently fixed to real property, as specified. Existing law prohibits a public agency from permitting a property owner to participate in any program established pursuant to these provisions if the owner's participation would result in the total amount of any annual property taxes and assessments exceeding 5% of the property's market value, as determined at the time of approval of the owner's contractual assessment. This bill would also prohibit a public agency from permitting a property owner to participate in a program pursuant to these provisions unless the property owner satisfies certain conditions and the property owner is given the right to cancel the contractual assessment at any time prior to midnight on the 3rd business day after certain events occur without penalty or obligation, consistent with certain requirements. The bill would require a financing estimate document or a substantially equivalent document to be completed and delivered to a property owner before the property owner consummates a voluntary contractual assessment pursuant to one of these programs. The bill would prohibit a public agency or other party to a voluntary contractual assessment pursuant to one of these programs to make any monetary or percentage representations of increased value to a property owner regarding the effect the financed improvements will have on the market value of the property unless the public agency or other party derives its estimates of market value using specified methods. This bill would limit these provisions to a property owner who seeks to participate in a program established to finance the installation of distributed generation renewable energy sources, energy or water efficiency improvements, seismic strengthening improvements, or electric vehicle charging infrastructure that are permanently fixed to real property pursuant to these provisions for a residential property with 4 or fewer units. (2) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 specifies the requirements for the establishment of a community facilities district, including, among other things, a petition, a hearing, the establishment of the boundaries of the community facilities district, and an election on the question. Existing law authorizes a community facilities district formed pursuant to an alternative procedure under which the district initially consists solely of territory proposed for annexation to the community facilities district in the future and territory is annexed and subjected to special taxes only upon unanimous approval of the owners, to finance and refinance the acquisition, installation, and improvement of energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy improvements. This bill would require a legislative body to comply with the requirements described above prior to the annexation of a parcel or parcels to a community facilities district formed pursuant to the alternative procedure. The bill would prohibit a parcel or parcels from being annexed to a community facilities district formed pursuant to the alternative procedure if the parcel owner is seeking financing for improvement on a residential property with 4 or fewer units, unless the parcel satisfies specified conditions. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 53328.1 of the Government Code proposed by AB 2618 to be operative only if AB 2618 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 2693?
AB 2693 is sponsored by Dababneh, Hadley, Linder, and Travis Allen.
What is the current status of AB 2693?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2693?
Track AB 2693 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2693

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2693

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →