An act relating to the excess spending threshold
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 220 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 220.
You're tracking S 220
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 220 — An act relating to the excess spending threshold
Last action — Read first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
100 added · 61 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes made to Bill S 220 primarily involve the addition of a few lines that clarify how the "allowable growth percentage" for school districts is calculated. The bill now explicitly states that the minimum allowable growth percentage is three percent, ensuring that all districts have a baseline level of funding growth. This matters because it helps prevent lower-spending districts from falling too far behind higher-spending ones, promoting more equitable funding across schools.
BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.220 Page 1 of 34 S.220 AnIntroduced act relating to the excess spending threshold It is hereby enacted by theSenator GeneralBaruth AssemblyReferred ofto theCommittee Stateon ofFinance Vermont:Date:
January 8, 2026 Subject:
Taxation and finance;
education property tax;
education;
State funding of public education;
education spending;
per pupil education spending;
allowable growth Statement of purpose of bill as introduced:
This bill proposes to limit the growth in each school district’s per pupil education spending in fiscal years 2028 and 2029 to a specified allowable growth percentage of the district’s prior year per pupil education spending.
An act relating to addressing education spending in fiscal years 2028 and 2029 An act relating to the excess spending threshold It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:
ALLOWABLE GROWTH IN EDUCATION SPENDING FOR FISCAL YEARS 2028 AND 2029 (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for fiscal years 2028 and 2029 only, a school district’s per pupil education spending, as defined in 16 V.S.A.
§ 4001(14), shall not exceed the sum of the district’s per pupil education spending in the prior fiscal year and the district’s allowable growth.
(b) As used in this section:
BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.220 Page 2 of 4 (1) “Allowable growth” for a school district means the product of the district’s allowable growth percentage and the district’s per pupil education spending in the prior fiscal year.
(2)(A) “Allowable growth percentage” for a school district means nine percent of the difference in per pupil education spending in the prior fiscal year between the district and the highest spending district, excluding gores, expressed as a percentage of the district’s per pupil education spending in the prior fiscal year, provided that the minimum allowable growth percentage shall be three percent.
(B) A school district’s “allowable growth percentage” is calculated as follows:
(i) subtract the district’s per pupil education spending in the prior fiscal year from the highest per pupil education spending in any district, excluding gores, in the prior fiscal year;
(ii) divide the difference determined under subdivision (i) of this subdivision (2)(B) by the district’s per pupil education spending in the prior fiscal year;
and (iii) multiply the percentage determined under subdivision (ii) of this subdivision (2)(B) by nine percent.
Sec.2.
EFFECTIVE DATE This act shall take effect on July 1, 2026.
BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.220 Page 3 of 4 Sec.
1.
§§ 4001 4001 is amended to read:
§§ 4001. 4001.
* * * VT LEG #388283 v.1 AS PASSED BY SENATE S.220 Page 2 of 3 Sec.
§§ 5401 5401 is amended to read:
§§ 5401. 5401.
§§ 2804(b). 2804(b).
BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE S.220 Page 4 of 4 (C) A school district’s excess spending shall be zero if any of the following conditions is met:
VT LEG #388283 v.1 AS PASSED BY SENATE S.220 Page 3 of 3 (ii) the district’s per pupil education spending is not greater than the district’s per pupil education spending for the preceding school year;
VT LEG #388283 v.1
View plain text versions (3)
- As Passed By the Senate (OfficialOpens in a new window) View text pdf
- As Passed By the Senate (UnofficialOpens in a new window) View text Current pdf
- Introduced As IntroducedOpens in a new window pdf
Action History
-
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
-
Read 3rd time & passed
-
New Business/Third Reading
-
3rd reading ordered
-
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance agreed to
-
Reported favorably by Senator Baruth for Committee on Appropriations
-
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator Chittenden for Committee on Finance
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance
-
Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance
-
Second Reading
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Senate Rule 31
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance
-
Second Reading
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Finance
Sponsors
- Philip E Baruth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 189 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Philip E Baruth Democrat/Progressive
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (189)
189 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 189 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 220?
- S 220 is sponsored by Philip E Baruth (Democrat/Progressive).
- What is the current status of S 220?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track S 220?
- Track S 220 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 220
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 220
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →