Postsecondary education: Success for Homeless Youth in Higher Education Act.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 801 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 801.
You're tracking AB 801
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 801 — Postsecondary education: Success for Homeless Youth in Higher Education Act.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 432, Statutes of 2016.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Donahoe Higher Education Act, sets forth the missions and functions of the segments of postsecondary education in this state. Among other things, the act requires the California State University and each community college district, and requests the University of California, with respect to each campus in their respective jurisdictions that administers a priority enrollment system, to grant priority in that system for registration for enrollment to foster youth, as defined, or former foster youth, until the repeal of this provision on January 1, 2017. This bill would enact the Success for Homeless Youth in Higher Education Act. The bill would delete the repeal date of, and thereby extend indefinitely, the above-referenced priority requirement, with respect to the California State University and community college districts, and the request for the granting of priority, with respect to the University of California. The bill would extend that priority requirement, and that request, to include homeless youth until January 1, 2020. To the extent that this provision would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing provisions of the Donahoe Higher Education Act set forth various duties and responsibilities for state entities, such as the California State University, the California Community Colleges, the University of California, and the Treasurer, with respect to federal assistance to higher education. Existing provisions of the Ortiz-Pacheco-Poochigian-Vasconcellos Cal Grant Program set forth the requirements for status as a "qualifying institution" whose students are eligible, if as individuals they meet pertinent program requirements, to receive Cal Grant awards. This bill would require qualifying institutions, other than the University of California, which would be requested to do so, to designate a staff member who is employed within the financial aid office, or another appropriate office or department, of the institution to serve as a Homeless and Foster Student Liaison and to inform current and prospective students of the institution about student financial aid and other assistance available to homeless youth and current and former foster youth, as specified. To the extent that this provision would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law establishes the Student Aid Commission and assigns to it numerous duties with respect to student financial aid programs, including the Community College Student Financial Aid Outreach Program and the Student Opportunity and Access Program. Both of these programs include provisions addressing the needs of youth from low-income households and specifically include low-income youth within the scope of the respective programs. This bill would additionally place homeless youth, as defined, within the scope of these programs. (4) Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge an enrollment fee of $46 per unit per semester, but authorizes the waiver of this fee for students meeting specified requirements. This bill would add persons who are, at the time of enrollment, homeless youths, as defined, to the groups of persons eligible for this fee waiver. To the extent that this provision would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 66025.9 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 906, to be operative only if SB 906 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/21/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 21, 2016
- Enrolled 08/30/16 - Enrolled pdf August 30, 2016
- Amended 08/17/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 17, 2016
- Amended 05/09/16 - Amended Senate pdf May 09, 2016
- Amended 09/03/15 - Amended Senate pdf September 03, 2015
- Amended 09/01/15 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2015
- Amended 06/01/15 - Amended Assembly pdf June 01, 2015
- Introduced 02/26/15 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2015
- AB801 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 432, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 66. Noes 13. Page 6385.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 1. Page 5306.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Leno.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Leno.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 13. Page 1843.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and HUM. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bloom
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 59 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 66 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 16% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 3% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 56 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 61 | 13 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 16% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 18% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 15% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 801 do?
- (1) Existing law, the Donahoe Higher Education Act, sets forth the missions and functions of the segments of postsecondary education in this state. Among other things, the act requires the California State University and each community college district, and requests the University of California, with respect to each campus in their respective jurisdictions that administers a priority enrollment system, to grant priority in that system for registration for enrollment to foster youth, as defined, or former foster youth, until the repeal of this provision on January 1, 2017. This bill would enact the Success for Homeless Youth in Higher Education Act. The bill would delete the repeal date of, and thereby extend indefinitely, the above-referenced priority requirement, with respect to the California State University and community college districts, and the request for the granting of priority, with respect to the University of California. The bill would extend that priority requirement, and that request, to include homeless youth until January 1, 2020. To the extent that this provision would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing provisions of the Donahoe Higher Education Act set forth various duties and responsibilities for state entities, such as the California State University, the California Community Colleges, the University of California, and the Treasurer, with respect to federal assistance to higher education. Existing provisions of the Ortiz-Pacheco-Poochigian-Vasconcellos Cal Grant Program set forth the requirements for status as a "qualifying institution" whose students are eligible, if as individuals they meet pertinent program requirements, to receive Cal Grant awards. This bill would require qualifying institutions, other than the University of California, which would be requested to do so, to designate a staff member who is employed within the financial aid office, or another appropriate office or department, of the institution to serve as a Homeless and Foster Student Liaison and to inform current and prospective students of the institution about student financial aid and other assistance available to homeless youth and current and former foster youth, as specified. To the extent that this provision would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law establishes the Student Aid Commission and assigns to it numerous duties with respect to student financial aid programs, including the Community College Student Financial Aid Outreach Program and the Student Opportunity and Access Program. Both of these programs include provisions addressing the needs of youth from low-income households and specifically include low-income youth within the scope of the respective programs. This bill would additionally place homeless youth, as defined, within the scope of these programs. (4) Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law requires the governing board of each community college district to charge an enrollment fee of $46 per unit per semester, but authorizes the waiver of this fee for students meeting specified requirements. This bill would add persons who are, at the time of enrollment, homeless youths, as defined, to the groups of persons eligible for this fee waiver. To the extent that this provision would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 66025.9 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 906, to be operative only if SB 906 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 801?
- AB 801 is sponsored by Bloom.
- What is the current status of AB 801?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 801?
- Track AB 801 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 801
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 801
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →