Education: omnibus bill.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 436 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 436.
You're tracking SB 436
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 436 — Education: omnibus bill.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 386, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the K–12 High-Speed Network, as specified, for the purpose of enriching pupil educational experiences and improving pupil academic performance by providing high‑speed, high‑bandwidth Internet connectivity to the public schools. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to use a competitive grant process to select a local educational agency to serve as the Lead Education Agency to administer the network on behalf of the Superintendent. Existing law requires the Superintendent to establish a K–12 HSN advisory board to include the Superintendent, the county superintendent of schools of the Lead Education Agency, the President of the State Board of Education, and other officers of local educational agencies, including 3 schoolsite representatives, as specified. This bill would specify that the schoolsite representatives appointed to the advisory board under this provision would serve renewable 2-year terms. (2) Existing law authorizes the State Allocation Board to allocate any amount of the funds designated for purposes of school housing aid for school districts impacted by seasonal agricultural employment that is in excess of the amounts needed for administration to any of specified funds, including the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund, as provided. Existing law separately authorizes the board to transfer any funds within the State School Building Aid Fund that are in excess of the amounts needed by the board for the maintenance of portable buildings or for the purchase of new portable buildings, for that fiscal year, to any of specified funds, including the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund, as provided. This bill would delete those allocation authorizations to the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund. (3) Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to establish a restricted fund known as the "district deferred maintenance fund" for certain school facilities purposes, including, among others, any other items of maintenance approved by the State Allocation Board. This bill would remove that purpose from the list of specifically authorized purposes, but would no longer limit the use of the fund to the list of specifically authorized purposes. (4) Existing law requires the State Department of Education, and authorizes the Compton Unified School District, to identify low-performing schools in the school district, as provided, for purposes of providing extended school year instruction. Former law, repealed by its own provisions on January 1, 2003, authorized the Compton Unified School District to receive funding for extended year classes at those low-performing schools in the school district, as provided. Existing law requires the department, in conjunction with the Legislative Analyst, to contract for 2 independent evaluations, as provided, to determine the effectiveness of the extended school year curriculum, instructional program, and materials in improving pupil academic outcomes at those low-performing schools in the Compton Unified School District. Existing law requires the results of the evaluations to be reported on or before January 1, 2002, and January 1, 2003, respectively, to specified persons. This bill would delete those obsolete provisions. (5) Existing law, the Chacon-Moscone Bilingual-Bicultural Education Act of 1976, which ceased to be operative on June 30, 1987, required, among other things, that the Superintendent of Public Instruction report annually to the Legislature on bilingual education programs, as specified. The act also required the State Department of Education to prepare and submit to the Legislature an annual report regarding the number of participants in the State Bilingual Teacher Training Assistance Program and other topics related to that program. This bill would delete those reporting requirements. (6) Existing law establishes programs to provide state aid to public schools where pupil performance is affected by factors such as low family income, high pupil transiency rates, and large numbers of homes where a primary language other than English is spoken. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to submit annually to the Governor and to each house of the Legislature a report evaluating these programs and containing information related to specified topics. This bill would delete the requirement for this annual report. (7) This bill would also update references, delete other obsolete provisions, make conforming changes, and make other nonsubstantive changes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/15 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2015
- Enrolled 09/01/15 - Enrolled pdf September 01, 2015
- Amended 07/08/15 - Amended Assembly pdf July 08, 2015
- Amended 04/06/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 06, 2015
- Introduced 02/25/15 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2015
- SB436 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 386, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2377.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2637.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 19).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 746.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 522.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set for hearing April 8.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Education · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Education
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 436 do?
- (1) Existing law establishes the K–12 High-Speed Network, as specified, for the purpose of enriching pupil educational experiences and improving pupil academic performance by providing high‑speed, high‑bandwidth Internet connectivity to the public schools. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to use a competitive grant process to select a local educational agency to serve as the Lead Education Agency to administer the network on behalf of the Superintendent. Existing law requires the Superintendent to establish a K–12 HSN advisory board to include the Superintendent, the county superintendent of schools of the Lead Education Agency, the President of the State Board of Education, and other officers of local educational agencies, including 3 schoolsite representatives, as specified. This bill would specify that the schoolsite representatives appointed to the advisory board under this provision would serve renewable 2-year terms. (2) Existing law authorizes the State Allocation Board to allocate any amount of the funds designated for purposes of school housing aid for school districts impacted by seasonal agricultural employment that is in excess of the amounts needed for administration to any of specified funds, including the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund, as provided. Existing law separately authorizes the board to transfer any funds within the State School Building Aid Fund that are in excess of the amounts needed by the board for the maintenance of portable buildings or for the purchase of new portable buildings, for that fiscal year, to any of specified funds, including the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund, as provided. This bill would delete those allocation authorizations to the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund. (3) Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to establish a restricted fund known as the "district deferred maintenance fund" for certain school facilities purposes, including, among others, any other items of maintenance approved by the State Allocation Board. This bill would remove that purpose from the list of specifically authorized purposes, but would no longer limit the use of the fund to the list of specifically authorized purposes. (4) Existing law requires the State Department of Education, and authorizes the Compton Unified School District, to identify low-performing schools in the school district, as provided, for purposes of providing extended school year instruction. Former law, repealed by its own provisions on January 1, 2003, authorized the Compton Unified School District to receive funding for extended year classes at those low-performing schools in the school district, as provided. Existing law requires the department, in conjunction with the Legislative Analyst, to contract for 2 independent evaluations, as provided, to determine the effectiveness of the extended school year curriculum, instructional program, and materials in improving pupil academic outcomes at those low-performing schools in the Compton Unified School District. Existing law requires the results of the evaluations to be reported on or before January 1, 2002, and January 1, 2003, respectively, to specified persons. This bill would delete those obsolete provisions. (5) Existing law, the Chacon-Moscone Bilingual-Bicultural Education Act of 1976, which ceased to be operative on June 30, 1987, required, among other things, that the Superintendent of Public Instruction report annually to the Legislature on bilingual education programs, as specified. The act also required the State Department of Education to prepare and submit to the Legislature an annual report regarding the number of participants in the State Bilingual Teacher Training Assistance Program and other topics related to that program. This bill would delete those reporting requirements. (6) Existing law establishes programs to provide state aid to public schools where pupil performance is affected by factors such as low family income, high pupil transiency rates, and large numbers of homes where a primary language other than English is spoken. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to submit annually to the Governor and to each house of the Legislature a report evaluating these programs and containing information related to specified topics. This bill would delete the requirement for this annual report. (7) This bill would also update references, delete other obsolete provisions, make conforming changes, and make other nonsubstantive changes.
- Who sponsors SB 436?
- SB 436 is sponsored by Committee on Education.
- What is the current status of SB 436?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 436?
- Track SB 436 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 436
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 436
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →