California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 1993 — Law enforcement contact process: service providers.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 514, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes a court or magistrate to issue a warrant for the search of a place and the seizure of property or things identified in the warrant if there is probable cause to believe that specified grounds exist. This bill would require service providers to maintain a law enforcement contact process that meets specified criteria and, by July 1, 2017, file a statement with the Attorney General describing that process. The bill would require a service provider to file a statement with the Attorney General describing any material change to its process as soon as practicable after making that change. The bill would require the Attorney General to consolidate the statements received pursuant to these provisions in one discrete record and regularly make that record available to law enforcement agencies. The bill would make the statements confidential and prohibit their disclosure pursuant to any state law. By increasing the duties of local law enforcement agencies to maintain confidential records, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 514, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 22. Page 6471.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 5415.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 11).

  11. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).

  14. In committee: Testimony taken. Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  16. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 19. Page 4854.)

  19. Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 4768.)

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (April 27).

  22. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  24. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  25. Read second time and amended.

  26. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 5).

  27. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  28. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  29. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  30. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  31. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  32. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  33. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  34. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1993 IRWIN Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 55 Yea · 22 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 491803
Democratic 5000
Republican 1400
Total 552203
% of votes cast 69%28%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Baker — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Medina — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Thurmond — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Burke — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gray — Yea
Harper — Nay
Lopez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Campos — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Chang — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Kim — Not Voting
Ting — Nay
Waldron — Not Voting
Gomez — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB1993 Irwin By Pavley

Passed 25 Yea · 13 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231201
Democratic 2100
Total 251301
% of votes cast 64%33%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Nay
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hertzberg — Nay
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 6 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5100
Democratic 1000
Total 6100
% of votes cast 86%14%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Mendoza — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1993 IRWIN Assembly Third Reading

Passed 54 Yea · 19 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 481507
Democratic 5000
Republican 1400
Total 541907
% of votes cast 68%24%0%9%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kim — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Not Voting
McCarty — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Burke — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Low — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Gray — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Brown — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Daly — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Levine — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Harper — Nay
Linder — Nay
Mayes — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Chang — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Wilk — Not Voting
Williams — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1993 IRWIN Assembly Third Reading Amend By IRWIN Set #1

Passed 50 Yea · 25 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452005
Democratic 5000
Republican 0500
Total 502505
% of votes cast 63%31%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Mayes — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gray — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Burke — Not Voting
Harper — Nay
Chang — Not Voting
Jones-Sawyer — Not Voting
Kim — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Baker — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Linder — Not Voting
Maienschein — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Steinorth — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11302
Democratic 2000
Republican 0200
Total 13502
% of votes cast 65%25%0%10%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chang — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Daly — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1993 do?
Existing law authorizes a court or magistrate to issue a warrant for the search of a place and the seizure of property or things identified in the warrant if there is probable cause to believe that specified grounds exist. This bill would require service providers to maintain a law enforcement contact process that meets specified criteria and, by July 1, 2017, file a statement with the Attorney General describing that process. The bill would require a service provider to file a statement with the Attorney General describing any material change to its process as soon as practicable after making that change. The bill would require the Attorney General to consolidate the statements received pursuant to these provisions in one discrete record and regularly make that record available to law enforcement agencies. The bill would make the statements confidential and prohibit their disclosure pursuant to any state law. By increasing the duties of local law enforcement agencies to maintain confidential records, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 1993?
AB 1993 is sponsored by Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 1993?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1993?
Track AB 1993 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1993

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1993

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →