Alcoholic beverages.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1971 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1971.
You're tracking AB 1971
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1971 — Alcoholic beverages.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Hall.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (act) authorizes the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (department) to conduct administrative hearings for, among other things, violations of the act by a licensee. Existing law allows a licensee to appeal specified decisions to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, authorizes a person to request a transcript of a hearing from the department for a case on appeal, and allows a party to an appeal to request the right to appear before the board for argument. This bill would require an audio record to be kept as the official record of any administrative hearing conducted by the department, would require the department to provide an audio recording, when one has been made, of a hearing to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board and each party in lieu of a transcript for a case on appeal, and would require an audio record to be kept of an argument before the board. The bill would prohibit the department from making the official record of any administrative hearing by videographic recording and would provide that this type of recording is inadmissible in any proceeding before the board. (2) The act authorizes a licensee under an on-sale general license or an on-sale beer and wine license to apply to the department for an event permit that allows the sale of alcoholic beverages under that license for consumption on property adjacent to the licensed premises and owned or under the control of the licensee. The act also authorizes a licensed beer manufacturer to apply to the department for a brewery event permit that allows the sale of beer produced by that beer manufacturer for consumption on property contiguous and adjacent to the licensed premises of the manufacturer. Under the act, the fee for an event permit issued to an on-sale general licensee or an on-sale beer and wine licensee is $110 for permits issued during the 2004 calendar year and indexed for inflation thereafter, and the fee for a brewery event permit issued during the 2017 calendar year is $110 and indexed for inflation thereafter, as specified. Under the act, these and other fees collected pursuant to the act are deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund and are generally allocated to the department upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would revise the fee for a brewery event permit to be identical to the fee for an event permit issued to an on-sale general licensee or an on-sale beer and wine licensee, as described above. (3) The act authorizes the holder of a winegrower's license, a beer manufacturer, a distilled spirits manufacturer, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent, to purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee, under certain conditions, if the on-sale retail licensee is the owner, manager, agent of the owner, assignee of the owner's advertising rights, or major tenant of facilities meeting specified criteria, including location in a specified city, county, or university campus. This bill would, in addition, allow a beer manufacturer, the holder of a winegrower's license, a rectifier, a distilled spirits manufacturer, or distilled spirits manufacturer's agent to purchase advertising time and space from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee if the licensee is the owner, manager, agent of the owner, assignee of the owner's advertising rights, or major tenant of stadiums and arenas subject to specified conditions, including that the advertising time and space is purchased only in connection with events to be held on the premises of those stadiums or arenas, but without specifying the location of the facility.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/01/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 01, 2016
- Amended 06/20/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 20, 2016
- Introduced 02/16/16 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2016
- AB1971 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Hall.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 14).
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 4786.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 4).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Cooper · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cooper
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 68 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1971 do?
- (1) The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (act) authorizes the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (department) to conduct administrative hearings for, among other things, violations of the act by a licensee. Existing law allows a licensee to appeal specified decisions to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, authorizes a person to request a transcript of a hearing from the department for a case on appeal, and allows a party to an appeal to request the right to appear before the board for argument. This bill would require an audio record to be kept as the official record of any administrative hearing conducted by the department, would require the department to provide an audio recording, when one has been made, of a hearing to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board and each party in lieu of a transcript for a case on appeal, and would require an audio record to be kept of an argument before the board. The bill would prohibit the department from making the official record of any administrative hearing by videographic recording and would provide that this type of recording is inadmissible in any proceeding before the board. (2) The act authorizes a licensee under an on-sale general license or an on-sale beer and wine license to apply to the department for an event permit that allows the sale of alcoholic beverages under that license for consumption on property adjacent to the licensed premises and owned or under the control of the licensee. The act also authorizes a licensed beer manufacturer to apply to the department for a brewery event permit that allows the sale of beer produced by that beer manufacturer for consumption on property contiguous and adjacent to the licensed premises of the manufacturer. Under the act, the fee for an event permit issued to an on-sale general licensee or an on-sale beer and wine licensee is $110 for permits issued during the 2004 calendar year and indexed for inflation thereafter, and the fee for a brewery event permit issued during the 2017 calendar year is $110 and indexed for inflation thereafter, as specified. Under the act, these and other fees collected pursuant to the act are deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund and are generally allocated to the department upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would revise the fee for a brewery event permit to be identical to the fee for an event permit issued to an on-sale general licensee or an on-sale beer and wine licensee, as described above. (3) The act authorizes the holder of a winegrower's license, a beer manufacturer, a distilled spirits manufacturer, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent, to purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee, under certain conditions, if the on-sale retail licensee is the owner, manager, agent of the owner, assignee of the owner's advertising rights, or major tenant of facilities meeting specified criteria, including location in a specified city, county, or university campus. This bill would, in addition, allow a beer manufacturer, the holder of a winegrower's license, a rectifier, a distilled spirits manufacturer, or distilled spirits manufacturer's agent to purchase advertising time and space from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee if the licensee is the owner, manager, agent of the owner, assignee of the owner's advertising rights, or major tenant of stadiums and arenas subject to specified conditions, including that the advertising time and space is purchased only in connection with events to be held on the premises of those stadiums or arenas, but without specifying the location of the facility.
- Who sponsors AB 1971?
- AB 1971 is sponsored by Cooper.
- What is the current status of AB 1971?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1971?
- Track AB 1971 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1971
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1971
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →