SB 966 — Controlled substances: sentence enhancements: prior convictions.
Last action — June 28 set for second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law imposes on a person convicted of a violation of, or of conspiracy to violate, specified crimes relating to controlled substances a full, separate, and consecutive 3-year term for each prior conviction of, or for each prior conviction of conspiracy to violate, specified controlled substances crimes, including possession for sale and purchase for sale of opiates, opium derivatives, and hallucinogenic substances. This bill would instead limit the above sentence enhancement to only be based on each prior conviction of, or on each prior conviction of conspiracy to violate, the crime of manufacturing specified controlled substances through chemical extraction or synthesis or the crime of using a minor in the commission of offenses involving specified controlled substances.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/01/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 01, 2016
- Introduced 02/08/16 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2016
- SB966 View text html
Action History
-
June 28 set for second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.)
-
June 21 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 4145.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 3665.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Mitchell.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 18. Noes 16. Page 3665.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 3395.) (April 5).
-
Set for hearing April 5.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 10.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Mitchell · Primary
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Wieckowski · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mitchell
Co-sponsors (2)
- Leno
- Wieckowski
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 29% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 13 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 35% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 15 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 18 | 16 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 45% | 40% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 966 do?
- Existing law imposes on a person convicted of a violation of, or of conspiracy to violate, specified crimes relating to controlled substances a full, separate, and consecutive 3-year term for each prior conviction of, or for each prior conviction of conspiracy to violate, specified controlled substances crimes, including possession for sale and purchase for sale of opiates, opium derivatives, and hallucinogenic substances. This bill would instead limit the above sentence enhancement to only be based on each prior conviction of, or on each prior conviction of conspiracy to violate, the crime of manufacturing specified controlled substances through chemical extraction or synthesis or the crime of using a minor in the commission of offenses involving specified controlled substances.
- Who sponsors SB 966?
- SB 966 is sponsored by Mitchell, Leno, and Wieckowski.
- What is the current status of SB 966?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 966?
- Track SB 966 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 966
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 966
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →