Public resources: energy.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 840 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 840.
You're tracking SB 840
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 840 — Public resources: energy.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 341, Statutes of 2016.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 07, 2016. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities. Existing law authorizes the PUC to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law authorizes certain public utilities, including gas corporations, to propose research and development programs and authorizes the PUC to allow inclusion of expenses for research and development in the public utility's rates. Existing law requires the PUC to consider specified guidelines in evaluating the research, development, and demonstration programs proposed by gas corporations. The California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program requires the PUC to adopt policies and programs that promote the in-state production and distribution of biomethane. Existing law requires the PUC to adopt, by rule or order, standards for biomethane that specify the concentrations of constituents of concern that are reasonably necessary to protect public health and ensure pipeline integrity and safety, as specified, and requirements for monitoring, testing, reporting, and recordkeeping, as specified. Existing law requires a gas corporation to comply with those standards and requirements and requires that gas corporation tariffs condition access to common carrier pipelines on the applicable customer meeting those standards and requirements. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the PUC is a crime. This bill would request the California Council on Science and Technology to undertake and complete a study analyzing the regional and gas corporation specific issues relating to minimum heating value and maximum siloxane specifications adopted by the PUC for biomethane before it can be injected into common carrier gas pipelines. If the California Council on Science and Technology agrees to undertake and complete the study, the bill would require each gas corporation operating common carrier pipelines in California to proportionately contribute to the expenses to undertake the study with the cost recoverable in rates. The bill would authorize the PUC to modify certain available monetary incentives to allocate some of the incentive moneys to pay for the costs of the study so as to not further burden ratepayers with additional expense. If the California Council on Science and Technology agrees to undertake and complete the study, the bill would require the PUC, within 6 months of its completion, to reevaluate requirements and standards adopted for injection of biomethane into common carrier pipelines and, if appropriate, change those requirements and standards or adopt new requirements and standards, giving due deference to the conclusions and recommendations made in the study. Because certain provisions of the bill would be a part of the act and a violation of an order or decision of the PUC implementing its requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. Existing law requires the PUC to direct the electrical corporations to collectively procure at least 250 megawatts of cumulative rated generating capacity from developers of bioenergy projects that commence operation on or after June 1, 2013. Existing law requires the PUC, for each electrical corporation, to allocate shares of the 250 megawatts based on the ratio of each electrical corporation's peak demand compared to the total statewide peak demand. Existing law requires the PUC to allocate those 250 megawatts to electrical corporations from specified categories of bioenergy project types, with specified portions of that 250 megawatts to be allocated from each category. Existing law requires the PUC to encourage gas and electrical corporations to develop and offer programs and services to facilitate development of in-state biogas for a broad range of purposes. Existing law authorizes the PUC, in consultation with specified state agencies, if it finds that the categorical allocations of those 250 megawatts are not appropriate, to reallocate those 250 megawatts among those categories. This bill would establish interconnection requirements for certain bioenergy projects from which generation capacity is to be procured pursuant to the above requirement. Because the above requirements would be codified in the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The Green Tariff Shared Renewables Program requires a participating utility, defined as being an electrical corporation with 100,000 or more customers in California, to file with the PUC an application requesting approval of a tariff to implement a program enabling ratepayers to participate directly in offsite electrical generation facilities that use eligible renewable energy resources, consistent with certain legislative findings and statements of intent. Existing law requires the PUC, by July 1, 2014, to issue a decision concerning the participating utility's application, determining whether to approve or disapprove the application, with or without modifications. Existing law requires the PUC, after notice and opportunity for public comment, to approve the application if the PUC determines that the proposed program is reasonable and consistent with the legislative findings and statements of intent and requires the PUC to require that a participating utility's green tariff shared renewables program be administered in accordance with specified provisions. Existing law repeals the program on January 1, 2019. This bill would extend the operation of the program indefinitely. By extending the requirements of the Green Tariff Shared Renewables Program the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by extending the application of a crime. Decisions of the PUC adopted the California Solar Initiative administered by electrical corporations and subject to the PUC's supervision. Existing law requires the PUC and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) to undertake certain steps in implementing the California Solar Initiative and requires the PUC to ensure that the total cost over the duration of the program does not exceed $3,550,800,000. Existing law specifies that the financial components of the California Solar Initiative include the New Solar Homes Partnership Program, which is administered by the Energy Commission. Existing law requires the program to be funded by charges in the amount of $400,000,000 collected from customers of the state's 3 largest electrical corporations. If moneys from the Renewable Resource Trust Fund for the program are exhausted, existing law authorizes the PUC, upon notification by the Energy Commission, to require those electrical corporations to continue the administration of the program pursuant to the guidelines established by the Energy Commission for the program until the $400,000,000 monetary limit is reached. Existing law authorizes the PUC to determine whether a 3rd party, including the Energy Commission, should administer the electrical corporation's continuation of the program. Existing law establishes the Renewable Resource Trust Fund as a fund that is continuously appropriated, with certain exceptions for administrative expenses, in the State Treasury. This bill would require, if the PUC orders a continuation of the New Solar Homes Partnership Program and determines that the Energy Commission should be the 3rd party administrator for the program, that any funding made available for the program be deposited into the Emerging Renewable Resources Account of the Renewable Resource Trust Fund and used for the program. (2) The Public Utilities Act requires the PUC to submit various reports to the Legislature relative to the actions of the PUC. This bill would require the PUC to submit 2 reports to the relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature by March 1, 2017. The first report would pertain to the PUC's business process inventory efforts. The 2nd report would concern options to locate operations and staff outside of the PUC's San Francisco headquarters and would explore options to allow the PUC to collaborate with other state entities and provide staff more opportunities for training, career development, and exchange placements with other state entities. Existing law, with exceptions, prohibits a government entity from compelling the production of or access to electronic communication information or electronic device information without a search warrant, wiretap order, order for electronic reader records, or subpoena. This bill would provide that the above provisions do not limit the authority of the PUC or the Energy Commission to obtain energy or water supply and consumption information pursuant to the powers granted to them under the Public Utilities Code or the Public Resources Code and other applicable state laws. (3) Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency intending to enter into an energy savings contract to establish a pool of qualified energy service companies, as specified. Existing law authorizes energy service contracts for individual projects undertaken by any state or local agency to be awarded through a competitive selection process to those companies identified in the pool. This bill would authorize the department or another state or local agency intending to enter into contracts for energy retrofit projects, as defined, to establish one of those pools. The bill would, until January 1, 2020, authorize the department and other state agencies to establish one or more pools of qualified energy service companies, as defined, that have provided the department or state agency with a specific enforceable commitment regarding the use of a skilled and trained workforce. The bill would authorize the department or state agency to select a qualified energy service company from that pool for a specific energy retrofit project on a rotational basis. The bill would require those qualified energy service companies working on a contract or project to submit a monthly report to the department or state agency, as appropriate, demonstrating their compliance with the commitment regarding the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act is a crime. Because the above provisions would be codified in the act, a violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, among other things, by January 1, 2018, requires any new or replacement pipeline that is near environmentally or ecologically sensitive areas to use the best technology available to reduce the amount of oil released in a spill, as specified. Existing law requires operators of existing pipelines near these areas to submit a plan by January 1, 2018, to retrofit those pipelines for these purposes using the best available technology by January 1, 2020. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would define "oil" for these provisions of the act concerning pipeline safety, by reference to a specified federal regulation, to mean petroleum, petroleum products, anhydrous ammonia, and ethanol. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under the Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, the State Fire Marshal administers provisions regulating the inspection of intrastate pipelines that transport hazardous liquids. This bill would require the State Fire Marshal, on or before January 31, 2017, and on or before January 31 annually thereafter until January 31, 2021, to submit a report to the Legislature containing specified information regarding the inspection of those pipelines, shutoff systems in those pipelines, and the status of 2 specified pipelines. (5) Existing law imposes, among other things, an annual charge upon each person operating or owning an interest in an oil or gas well, with respect to the production of the well, which charge is payable to the Treasurer for deposit into the Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Administrative Fund. Existing law requires that moneys from charges levied, assessed, and collected upon the properties of every person operating or owning an interest in the production of a well be used exclusively, upon appropriation, for the support and maintenance of the Department of Conservation, which is charged with the supervision of oil and gas operations, and for the support of the State Water Resources Control Board and the regional water quality control boards for their activities related to oil and gas operations that may affect water resources. This bill would additionally authorize the use of those moneys for the support of the State Air Resources Board and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment for their activities related to oil and gas operations that may affect air quality, public health, or public safety. (6) Existing law establishes the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program, administered by the Energy Commission, to provide to specified entities, upon appropriation by the Legislature, grants, loans, loan guarantees, revolving loans, or other appropriate measures for the development and deployment of innovative technologies that transform California's fuel and vehicle types to help attain the state's climate change goals. Existing law establishes the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund, moneys in which are to be expended by the Energy Commission, upon appropriation, to implement the program. Existing law creates the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund in the State Treasury and required that specified moneys collected by the state's 3 largest electrical corporations, until January 1, 2012, be paid into the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund. Existing law requires $10,000,000 to be transferred annually from the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund to the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund. This bill would repeal the requirement that $10,000,000 be transferred annually from the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund to the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund. (7) Existing law vests with the Energy Commission jurisdiction over specified matters related to energy. Existing law requires the Attorney General, upon the request of the Energy Commission, to petition a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin violations of law that are within the subject matter of the Energy Commission. Existing law requires the Energy Commission to prescribe, by regulation, building design and construction standards, energy and water efficiency design standards for new residential and nonresidential buildings, and appliance efficiency standards. Existing law authorizes the Energy Commission to establish an administrative enforcement process to enforce the appliance efficiency standards. Existing law establishes the Appliance Efficiency Enforcement Subaccount in the Energy Resources Program Account for the deposition of the penalties collected. Existing law authorizes the moneys in the subaccount to be expended by the Energy Commission, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the education of the public regarding appliance energy efficiency and for the enforcement of specified regulations. This bill would appropriate $275,000 from the Appliance Efficiency Enforcement Subaccount in the Energy Resources Programs Account to the Energy Commission to support the Title 20 Appliance Efficiency Standards Compliance Assistance and Enforcement Program. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/13/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 13, 2016
- Enrolled 08/24/16 - Enrolled pdf August 24, 2016
- Amended 06/14/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 14, 2016
- Amended 05/25/16 - Amended Assembly pdf May 25, 2016
- Introduced 01/07/16 - Introduced pdf January 07, 2016
- SB840 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 341, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 13. Page 5239.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 53. Noes 23. Page 5390.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 5358.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 5358.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 3541.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 7.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 20 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 53 | 23 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 29% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 25 | 11 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 28% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 840 do?
- (1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities. Existing law authorizes the PUC to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law authorizes certain public utilities, including gas corporations, to propose research and development programs and authorizes the PUC to allow inclusion of expenses for research and development in the public utility's rates. Existing law requires the PUC to consider specified guidelines in evaluating the research, development, and demonstration programs proposed by gas corporations. The California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program requires the PUC to adopt policies and programs that promote the in-state production and distribution of biomethane. Existing law requires the PUC to adopt, by rule or order, standards for biomethane that specify the concentrations of constituents of concern that are reasonably necessary to protect public health and ensure pipeline integrity and safety, as specified, and requirements for monitoring, testing, reporting, and recordkeeping, as specified. Existing law requires a gas corporation to comply with those standards and requirements and requires that gas corporation tariffs condition access to common carrier pipelines on the applicable customer meeting those standards and requirements. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the PUC is a crime. This bill would request the California Council on Science and Technology to undertake and complete a study analyzing the regional and gas corporation specific issues relating to minimum heating value and maximum siloxane specifications adopted by the PUC for biomethane before it can be injected into common carrier gas pipelines. If the California Council on Science and Technology agrees to undertake and complete the study, the bill would require each gas corporation operating common carrier pipelines in California to proportionately contribute to the expenses to undertake the study with the cost recoverable in rates. The bill would authorize the PUC to modify certain available monetary incentives to allocate some of the incentive moneys to pay for the costs of the study so as to not further burden ratepayers with additional expense. If the California Council on Science and Technology agrees to undertake and complete the study, the bill would require the PUC, within 6 months of its completion, to reevaluate requirements and standards adopted for injection of biomethane into common carrier pipelines and, if appropriate, change those requirements and standards or adopt new requirements and standards, giving due deference to the conclusions and recommendations made in the study. Because certain provisions of the bill would be a part of the act and a violation of an order or decision of the PUC implementing its requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. Existing law requires the PUC to direct the electrical corporations to collectively procure at least 250 megawatts of cumulative rated generating capacity from developers of bioenergy projects that commence operation on or after June 1, 2013. Existing law requires the PUC, for each electrical corporation, to allocate shares of the 250 megawatts based on the ratio of each electrical corporation's peak demand compared to the total statewide peak demand. Existing law requires the PUC to allocate those 250 megawatts to electrical corporations from specified categories of bioenergy project types, with specified portions of that 250 megawatts to be allocated from each category. Existing law requires the PUC to encourage gas and electrical corporations to develop and offer programs and services to facilitate development of in-state biogas for a broad range of purposes. Existing law authorizes the PUC, in consultation with specified state agencies, if it finds that the categorical allocations of those 250 megawatts are not appropriate, to reallocate those 250 megawatts among those categories. This bill would establish interconnection requirements for certain bioenergy projects from which generation capacity is to be procured pursuant to the above requirement. Because the above requirements would be codified in the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The Green Tariff Shared Renewables Program requires a participating utility, defined as being an electrical corporation with 100,000 or more customers in California, to file with the PUC an application requesting approval of a tariff to implement a program enabling ratepayers to participate directly in offsite electrical generation facilities that use eligible renewable energy resources, consistent with certain legislative findings and statements of intent. Existing law requires the PUC, by July 1, 2014, to issue a decision concerning the participating utility's application, determining whether to approve or disapprove the application, with or without modifications. Existing law requires the PUC, after notice and opportunity for public comment, to approve the application if the PUC determines that the proposed program is reasonable and consistent with the legislative findings and statements of intent and requires the PUC to require that a participating utility's green tariff shared renewables program be administered in accordance with specified provisions. Existing law repeals the program on January 1, 2019. This bill would extend the operation of the program indefinitely. By extending the requirements of the Green Tariff Shared Renewables Program the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by extending the application of a crime. Decisions of the PUC adopted the California Solar Initiative administered by electrical corporations and subject to the PUC's supervision. Existing law requires the PUC and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) to undertake certain steps in implementing the California Solar Initiative and requires the PUC to ensure that the total cost over the duration of the program does not exceed $3,550,800,000. Existing law specifies that the financial components of the California Solar Initiative include the New Solar Homes Partnership Program, which is administered by the Energy Commission. Existing law requires the program to be funded by charges in the amount of $400,000,000 collected from customers of the state's 3 largest electrical corporations. If moneys from the Renewable Resource Trust Fund for the program are exhausted, existing law authorizes the PUC, upon notification by the Energy Commission, to require those electrical corporations to continue the administration of the program pursuant to the guidelines established by the Energy Commission for the program until the $400,000,000 monetary limit is reached. Existing law authorizes the PUC to determine whether a 3rd party, including the Energy Commission, should administer the electrical corporation's continuation of the program. Existing law establishes the Renewable Resource Trust Fund as a fund that is continuously appropriated, with certain exceptions for administrative expenses, in the State Treasury. This bill would require, if the PUC orders a continuation of the New Solar Homes Partnership Program and determines that the Energy Commission should be the 3rd party administrator for the program, that any funding made available for the program be deposited into the Emerging Renewable Resources Account of the Renewable Resource Trust Fund and used for the program. (2) The Public Utilities Act requires the PUC to submit various reports to the Legislature relative to the actions of the PUC. This bill would require the PUC to submit 2 reports to the relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature by March 1, 2017. The first report would pertain to the PUC's business process inventory efforts. The 2nd report would concern options to locate operations and staff outside of the PUC's San Francisco headquarters and would explore options to allow the PUC to collaborate with other state entities and provide staff more opportunities for training, career development, and exchange placements with other state entities. Existing law, with exceptions, prohibits a government entity from compelling the production of or access to electronic communication information or electronic device information without a search warrant, wiretap order, order for electronic reader records, or subpoena. This bill would provide that the above provisions do not limit the authority of the PUC or the Energy Commission to obtain energy or water supply and consumption information pursuant to the powers granted to them under the Public Utilities Code or the Public Resources Code and other applicable state laws. (3) Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency intending to enter into an energy savings contract to establish a pool of qualified energy service companies, as specified. Existing law authorizes energy service contracts for individual projects undertaken by any state or local agency to be awarded through a competitive selection process to those companies identified in the pool. This bill would authorize the department or another state or local agency intending to enter into contracts for energy retrofit projects, as defined, to establish one of those pools. The bill would, until January 1, 2020, authorize the department and other state agencies to establish one or more pools of qualified energy service companies, as defined, that have provided the department or state agency with a specific enforceable commitment regarding the use of a skilled and trained workforce. The bill would authorize the department or state agency to select a qualified energy service company from that pool for a specific energy retrofit project on a rotational basis. The bill would require those qualified energy service companies working on a contract or project to submit a monthly report to the department or state agency, as appropriate, demonstrating their compliance with the commitment regarding the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act is a crime. Because the above provisions would be codified in the act, a violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, among other things, by January 1, 2018, requires any new or replacement pipeline that is near environmentally or ecologically sensitive areas to use the best technology available to reduce the amount of oil released in a spill, as specified. Existing law requires operators of existing pipelines near these areas to submit a plan by January 1, 2018, to retrofit those pipelines for these purposes using the best available technology by January 1, 2020. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would define "oil" for these provisions of the act concerning pipeline safety, by reference to a specified federal regulation, to mean petroleum, petroleum products, anhydrous ammonia, and ethanol. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under the Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, the State Fire Marshal administers provisions regulating the inspection of intrastate pipelines that transport hazardous liquids. This bill would require the State Fire Marshal, on or before January 31, 2017, and on or before January 31 annually thereafter until January 31, 2021, to submit a report to the Legislature containing specified information regarding the inspection of those pipelines, shutoff systems in those pipelines, and the status of 2 specified pipelines. (5) Existing law imposes, among other things, an annual charge upon each person operating or owning an interest in an oil or gas well, with respect to the production of the well, which charge is payable to the Treasurer for deposit into the Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Administrative Fund. Existing law requires that moneys from charges levied, assessed, and collected upon the properties of every person operating or owning an interest in the production of a well be used exclusively, upon appropriation, for the support and maintenance of the Department of Conservation, which is charged with the supervision of oil and gas operations, and for the support of the State Water Resources Control Board and the regional water quality control boards for their activities related to oil and gas operations that may affect water resources. This bill would additionally authorize the use of those moneys for the support of the State Air Resources Board and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment for their activities related to oil and gas operations that may affect air quality, public health, or public safety. (6) Existing law establishes the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program, administered by the Energy Commission, to provide to specified entities, upon appropriation by the Legislature, grants, loans, loan guarantees, revolving loans, or other appropriate measures for the development and deployment of innovative technologies that transform California's fuel and vehicle types to help attain the state's climate change goals. Existing law establishes the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund, moneys in which are to be expended by the Energy Commission, upon appropriation, to implement the program. Existing law creates the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund in the State Treasury and required that specified moneys collected by the state's 3 largest electrical corporations, until January 1, 2012, be paid into the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund. Existing law requires $10,000,000 to be transferred annually from the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund to the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund. This bill would repeal the requirement that $10,000,000 be transferred annually from the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund to the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund. (7) Existing law vests with the Energy Commission jurisdiction over specified matters related to energy. Existing law requires the Attorney General, upon the request of the Energy Commission, to petition a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin violations of law that are within the subject matter of the Energy Commission. Existing law requires the Energy Commission to prescribe, by regulation, building design and construction standards, energy and water efficiency design standards for new residential and nonresidential buildings, and appliance efficiency standards. Existing law authorizes the Energy Commission to establish an administrative enforcement process to enforce the appliance efficiency standards. Existing law establishes the Appliance Efficiency Enforcement Subaccount in the Energy Resources Program Account for the deposition of the penalties collected. Existing law authorizes the moneys in the subaccount to be expended by the Energy Commission, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the education of the public regarding appliance energy efficiency and for the enforcement of specified regulations. This bill would appropriate $275,000 from the Appliance Efficiency Enforcement Subaccount in the Energy Resources Programs Account to the Energy Commission to support the Title 20 Appliance Efficiency Standards Compliance Assistance and Enforcement Program. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 840?
- SB 840 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 840?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 07, 2016. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 840?
- Track SB 840 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 840
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 840
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →