Public contracts: skilled and trained workforce.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 693 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 693.
You're tracking SB 693
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 693 — Public contracts: skilled and trained workforce.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 774, Statutes of 2016.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law establishes specific instances where a public entity is required to obtain an enforceable commitment that a bidder, contractor, or other entity will use a skilled and trained workforce to complete a contract or project. This bill would establish provisions to be generally applicable when a public entity is required by statute or regulation to obtain an enforceable commitment that a bidder, contractor, or other entity will use a skilled and trained workforce to complete a contract or project. The bill would also authorize a public entity to require that a bidder, contractor, or other entity use a skilled and trained workforce to complete a contract or project. Existing law relating to school facilities provides for the lease of property and prohibits the governing board of a school district from entering into specific lease agreements for the construction of buildings for the use of the school district with any entity unless the entity provides to the governing board an enforceable commitment that the entity and its subcontractors at every tier will use a skilled and trained workforce to perform all work on the project or contract that falls within an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades. Existing law relating to school facilities, operative July 1, 2016, and until January 1, 2025, also authorizes a school district, with the approval of the governing board of the school district, to procure design-build contracts for certain public works projects, as provided, and prohibits a design-build entity from being prequalified or shortlisted unless the entity provides a similar enforceable commitment to the school district with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Existing law relating to the Department of General Services and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation authorizes the Director of General Services and the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to procure design-build contracts for certain public works projects, as provided, and prohibits a design-build entity from being prequalified or shortlisted unless the entity provides a similar enforceable commitment to the departments with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Existing law relating to local agencies authorizes a local agency to procure design-build contracts for certain public works projects, as provided, and prohibits a design-build entity from being prequalified or shortlisted unless the entity provides a similar enforceable commitment to a local agency with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Existing law, until January 1, 2021, establishes a pilot program to authorize the Los Angeles Unified School District to use a best value procurement method for bid evaluation and selection for certain public projects (LAUSD pilot program) . The LAUSD pilot program precludes the prequalification or shortlisting of a best value entity unless the entity provides a similar enforceable commitment to the governing board of the district with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Existing law establishes a pilot program to allow the Counties of Alameda, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Solano, and Yuba to select a bidder on the basis of best value, as defined, for specific construction projects (pilot program for counties) . The pilot program for counties precludes the prequalification or shortlisting of a best value contractor unless the contractor provides a similar enforceable commitment to the county with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. This bill would revise those provisions specifically applicable to school facilities, the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and local agency design-build projects, the LAUSD pilot program, and the pilot program for counties to require, instead, an enforceable commitment for the use of a skilled and trained workforce in accordance with the above-described generally applicable provisions for the use of a skilled and trained workforce, unless there is a prescribed project labor agreement. The bill, except as specified, would not apply to contracts advertised for bid or awarded before January 1, 2017. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/28/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 28, 2016
- Enrolled 08/26/16 - Enrolled pdf August 26, 2016
- Amended 06/27/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 27, 2016
- Amended 04/18/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 18, 2016
- Introduced 02/27/15 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2015
- SB693 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 774, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 12. Page 5371.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 5317.)
-
Set for hearing August 23.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 5217.) Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 64. Noes 14. Page 5888.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 4.) (August 3).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 22).
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 9). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 1. Page 557.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 509.) (April 7).
-
Set for hearing April 7.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 1.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hueso · Primary
- Ridley-Thomas · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hueso
Co-sponsors (1)
- Ridley-Thomas
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 57 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 18% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 3% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 693 do?
- Existing law establishes specific instances where a public entity is required to obtain an enforceable commitment that a bidder, contractor, or other entity will use a skilled and trained workforce to complete a contract or project. This bill would establish provisions to be generally applicable when a public entity is required by statute or regulation to obtain an enforceable commitment that a bidder, contractor, or other entity will use a skilled and trained workforce to complete a contract or project. The bill would also authorize a public entity to require that a bidder, contractor, or other entity use a skilled and trained workforce to complete a contract or project. Existing law relating to school facilities provides for the lease of property and prohibits the governing board of a school district from entering into specific lease agreements for the construction of buildings for the use of the school district with any entity unless the entity provides to the governing board an enforceable commitment that the entity and its subcontractors at every tier will use a skilled and trained workforce to perform all work on the project or contract that falls within an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades. Existing law relating to school facilities, operative July 1, 2016, and until January 1, 2025, also authorizes a school district, with the approval of the governing board of the school district, to procure design-build contracts for certain public works projects, as provided, and prohibits a design-build entity from being prequalified or shortlisted unless the entity provides a similar enforceable commitment to the school district with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Existing law relating to the Department of General Services and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation authorizes the Director of General Services and the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to procure design-build contracts for certain public works projects, as provided, and prohibits a design-build entity from being prequalified or shortlisted unless the entity provides a similar enforceable commitment to the departments with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Existing law relating to local agencies authorizes a local agency to procure design-build contracts for certain public works projects, as provided, and prohibits a design-build entity from being prequalified or shortlisted unless the entity provides a similar enforceable commitment to a local agency with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Existing law, until January 1, 2021, establishes a pilot program to authorize the Los Angeles Unified School District to use a best value procurement method for bid evaluation and selection for certain public projects (LAUSD pilot program) . The LAUSD pilot program precludes the prequalification or shortlisting of a best value entity unless the entity provides a similar enforceable commitment to the governing board of the district with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. Existing law establishes a pilot program to allow the Counties of Alameda, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Solano, and Yuba to select a bidder on the basis of best value, as defined, for specific construction projects (pilot program for counties) . The pilot program for counties precludes the prequalification or shortlisting of a best value contractor unless the contractor provides a similar enforceable commitment to the county with respect to the use of a skilled and trained workforce. This bill would revise those provisions specifically applicable to school facilities, the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and local agency design-build projects, the LAUSD pilot program, and the pilot program for counties to require, instead, an enforceable commitment for the use of a skilled and trained workforce in accordance with the above-described generally applicable provisions for the use of a skilled and trained workforce, unless there is a prescribed project labor agreement. The bill, except as specified, would not apply to contracts advertised for bid or awarded before January 1, 2017. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
- Who sponsors SB 693?
- SB 693 is sponsored by Hueso and Ridley-Thomas.
- What is the current status of SB 693?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 693?
- Track SB 693 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 693
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 693
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →