Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District: powers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1061 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1061.
You're tracking AB 1061
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1061 — Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District: powers.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law grants to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board the authority to carry out various flood control activities, including the authority to construct, maintain, and operate ditches, canals, pumping plants, and other drainage works. Existing law requires revenues, rents, and proceeds from sale of crops from lands under the control of the board be paid into the State Treasury, as specified, with the balance of the revenues, rents, and proceeds going to the credit of the General Fund. Existing law establishes the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District under the management and control of the board for the purposes of carrying out specified flood management activities within the boundaries of the district. Existing law authorizes the district to acquire, own, hold, use, and enjoy any and all properties necessary for the purposes of the district. Existing law requires all moneys collected upon sales or otherwise be deposited in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Fund, as specified. Existing law requires moneys in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Fund be paid out upon warrants of the Controller and requires the Controller to issue warrants upon the funds whenever drafts of the board are presented. This bill would additionally authorize the district to sell, lease, rent, or otherwise dispose of a right-of-way, easement, or property, as specified, and to take, receive, and apply for purposes of flood control the income, profit, and revenue received from the lease or rental of the property. By adding a new source of revenue to a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/01/15 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 01, 2015
- Amended 04/29/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 29, 2015
- Introduced 02/26/15 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2015
- AB1061 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 2. Page 1885.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 28).
-
Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- James Gallagher · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gallagher, James Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 3% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Nay |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1061 do?
- Existing law grants to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board the authority to carry out various flood control activities, including the authority to construct, maintain, and operate ditches, canals, pumping plants, and other drainage works. Existing law requires revenues, rents, and proceeds from sale of crops from lands under the control of the board be paid into the State Treasury, as specified, with the balance of the revenues, rents, and proceeds going to the credit of the General Fund. Existing law establishes the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District under the management and control of the board for the purposes of carrying out specified flood management activities within the boundaries of the district. Existing law authorizes the district to acquire, own, hold, use, and enjoy any and all properties necessary for the purposes of the district. Existing law requires all moneys collected upon sales or otherwise be deposited in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Fund, as specified. Existing law requires moneys in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Fund be paid out upon warrants of the Controller and requires the Controller to issue warrants upon the funds whenever drafts of the board are presented. This bill would additionally authorize the district to sell, lease, rent, or otherwise dispose of a right-of-way, easement, or property, as specified, and to take, receive, and apply for purposes of flood control the income, profit, and revenue received from the lease or rental of the property. By adding a new source of revenue to a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District.
- Who sponsors AB 1061?
- AB 1061 is sponsored by Gallagher, James (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 1061?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1061?
- Track AB 1061 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1061
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1061
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →