Cities and counties: sales and use tax agreements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 533 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 533.
You're tracking SB 533
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 533 — Cities and counties: sales and use tax agreements.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 717, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law. That law provides that for the purpose of a local sales tax adopted pursuant to that law, all retail sales are consummated at the place of business of the retailer unless otherwise specified. Existing law prohibits a local agency, as defined to mean all cities and counties, from entering into any form of agreement with any other person that would involve the payment, transfer, diversion, or rebate of any amount of Bradley-Burns local tax revenues for any purpose if the agreement results in a reduction in the amount of revenue that is received by another local agency from a retailer that is located within the territorial jurisdiction of that other local agency, and the retailer continues to maintain a physical presence within the territorial jurisdiction of that other local agency, with specified exceptions, including an exception for an agreement to pay or rebate any Bradley-Burns local tax revenue relating to a buying company, as defined. This bill would repeal that prohibition and instead prohibit, on or after January 1, 2016, a local agency from entering into any form of agreement that would result, directly or indirectly, in the payment, transfer, diversion, or rebate of Bradley-Burns local tax revenues to any person, as defined, for any purpose, if the agreement results in a reduction in the amount of Bradley-Burns local tax revenues that, in the absence of the agreement, would be received by another local agency and the retailer continues to maintain a physical presence within the territorial jurisdiction of that other local agency, with specified exceptions. This bill would also impose specified notification and reporting requirements on a local agency entering into an agreement that results in a reduction of the amount of Bradley-Burns local tax revenues, that in the absence of the agreement, would be received by another local agency, prior to the ratification of that agreement. This bill would also require any local agency to post such an agreement on its Internet Web site, including any agreements entered into prior to January 1, 2016, that are still in effect. By imposing these notification and reporting requirements on a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would exclude from these provisions any mutual tax revenue sharing agreement between local agencies to pay, transfer, or divert Bradley-Burns local tax revenues to another local agency, and where the agreement would not result, directly or indirectly, in the payment, transfer, diversion, or rebate of those tax revenues to a retailer. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/09/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 09, 2015
- Enrolled 09/11/15 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2015
- Amended 07/06/15 - Amended Assembly pdf July 06, 2015
- Amended 06/10/15 - Amended Assembly pdf June 10, 2015
- Introduced 02/26/15 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2015
- SB533 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 717, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:45 a.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 12. Page 2707.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 22. Page 2697.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (August 19).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (July 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 1).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and REV. & TAX.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 1018.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 4.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 725.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
April 15 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 15.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 29.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Pan
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 18 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 22 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 28% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 28% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 533 do?
- The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law. That law provides that for the purpose of a local sales tax adopted pursuant to that law, all retail sales are consummated at the place of business of the retailer unless otherwise specified. Existing law prohibits a local agency, as defined to mean all cities and counties, from entering into any form of agreement with any other person that would involve the payment, transfer, diversion, or rebate of any amount of Bradley-Burns local tax revenues for any purpose if the agreement results in a reduction in the amount of revenue that is received by another local agency from a retailer that is located within the territorial jurisdiction of that other local agency, and the retailer continues to maintain a physical presence within the territorial jurisdiction of that other local agency, with specified exceptions, including an exception for an agreement to pay or rebate any Bradley-Burns local tax revenue relating to a buying company, as defined. This bill would repeal that prohibition and instead prohibit, on or after January 1, 2016, a local agency from entering into any form of agreement that would result, directly or indirectly, in the payment, transfer, diversion, or rebate of Bradley-Burns local tax revenues to any person, as defined, for any purpose, if the agreement results in a reduction in the amount of Bradley-Burns local tax revenues that, in the absence of the agreement, would be received by another local agency and the retailer continues to maintain a physical presence within the territorial jurisdiction of that other local agency, with specified exceptions. This bill would also impose specified notification and reporting requirements on a local agency entering into an agreement that results in a reduction of the amount of Bradley-Burns local tax revenues, that in the absence of the agreement, would be received by another local agency, prior to the ratification of that agreement. This bill would also require any local agency to post such an agreement on its Internet Web site, including any agreements entered into prior to January 1, 2016, that are still in effect. By imposing these notification and reporting requirements on a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would exclude from these provisions any mutual tax revenue sharing agreement between local agencies to pay, transfer, or divert Bradley-Burns local tax revenues to another local agency, and where the agreement would not result, directly or indirectly, in the payment, transfer, diversion, or rebate of those tax revenues to a retailer. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 533?
- SB 533 is sponsored by Pan.
- What is the current status of SB 533?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 533?
- Track SB 533 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 533
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 533
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →