Question 1

What does AB 1612 do?

Accepted Answer

(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities. Existing law authorizes the PUC to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law authorizes certain public utilities, including gas corporations, to propose research and development programs and authorizes the PUC to allow inclusion of expenses for research and development in the public utility's rates. Existing law requires the PUC to consider specified guidelines in evaluating the research, development, and demonstration programs proposed by gas corporations.

The California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program requires the PUC to adopt policies and programs that promote the in-state production and distribution of biomethane. Existing law requires the PUC to adopt, by rule or order, standards for biomethane that specify the concentrations of constituents of concern that are reasonably necessary to protect public health and ensure pipeline integrity and safety, as specified, and requirements for monitoring, testing, reporting, and recordkeeping, as specified. Existing law requires a gas corporation to comply with those standards and requirements and requires that gas corporation tariffs condition access to common carrier pipelines on the applicable customer meeting those standards and requirements. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the PUC is a crime.

This bill would request the California Council on Science and Technology to undertake and complete a study analyzing the regional and gas corporation specific issues relating to minimum heating value and maximum siloxane specifications adopted by the PUC for biomethane before it can be injected into common carrier gas pipelines. If the California Council on Science and Technology agrees to undertake and complete the study, the bill would require each gas corporation operating common carrier pipelines in California to proportionately contribute to the expenses to undertake the study with the cost recoverable in rates. The bill would authorize the PUC to modify certain available monetary incentives to allocate some of the incentive moneys to pay for the costs of the study so as to not further burden ratepayers with additional expense. If the California Council on Science and Technology agrees to undertake and complete the study, the bill would require the PUC, within 6 months of its completion, to reevaluate requirements and standards adopted for injection of biomethane into common carrier pipelines and, if appropriate, change those requirements and standards or adopt new requirements and standards, giving due deference to the conclusions and recommendations made in the study.

Existing law requires the PUC to direct the electrical corporations to collectively procure at least 250 megawatts of cumulative rated generating capacity from developers of bioenergy projects that commence operation on or after June 1, 2013. Existing law requires the PUC, for each electrical corporation, to allocate shares of the 250 megawatts based on the ratio of each electrical corporation's peak demand compared to the total statewide peak demand. Existing law requires the PUC to allocate those 250 megawatts to electrical corporations from specified categories of bioenergy project types, with specified portions of that 250 megawatts to be allocated from each category. Existing law requires the PUC to encourage gas and electrical corporations to develop and offer programs and services to facilitate development of in-state biogas for a broad range of purposes. Existing law authorizes the PUC, in consultation with specified state agencies, if it finds that the categorical allocations of those 250 megawatts are not appropriate, to reallocate those 250 megawatts among those categories.

This bill would establish interconnection requirements for certain bioenergy projects from which generation capacity is to be procured pursuant to the above requirement. Because the above requirements would be codified in the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime.

Existing law requires the PUC to require the administration, until January 1, 2021, of a self-generation incentive program for distributed generation resources and energy storage technologies. Existing law authorizes the PUC, in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, to authorize the annual collection of not more than the amount authorized for the program in the 2008 calendar year.

This bill would increase the maximum annual collection the PUC may authorize for the program to double the amount authorized for the program in the 2008 calendar year.

The Green Tariff Shared Renewables Program requires a participating utility, defined as being an electrical corporation with 100,000 or more customers in California, to file with the PUC an application requesting approval of a tariff to implement a program enabling ratepayers to participate directly in offsite electrical generation facilities that use eligible renewable energy resources, consistent with certain legislative findings and statements of intent. Existing law requires the PUC, by July 1, 2014, to issue a decision concerning the participating utility's application, determining whether to approve or disapprove the application, with or without modifications. Existing law requires the PUC, after notice and opportunity for public comment, to approve the application if the PUC determines that the proposed program is reasonable and consistent with the legislative findings and statements of intent and requires the PUC to require that a participating utility's Green Tariff shared renewables program be administered in accordance with specified provisions. Existing law repeals the program on January 1, 2019.

This bill would extend the operation of the program indefinitely. By extending the requirements of the Green Tariff Shared Renewables Program the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by extending the application of a crime.

Decisions of the PUC adopted the California Solar Initiative administered by electrical corporations and subject to the PUC's supervision. Existing law requires the PUC and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) to undertake certain steps in implementing the California Solar Initiative and requires the PUC to ensure that the total cost over the duration of the program does not exceed $3,550,800,000. Existing law specifies that the financial components of the California Solar Initiative include the New Solar Homes Partnership Program, which is administered by the Energy Commission. Existing law requires the program to be funded by charges in the amount of $400,000,000 collected from customers of the state's 3 largest electrical corporations. If moneys from the Renewable Resource Trust Fund for the program are exhausted, existing law authorizes the PUC, upon notification by the Energy Commission, to require those electrical corporations to continue the administration of the program pursuant to the guidelines established by the Energy Commission for the program until the $400,000,000 monetary limit is reached. Existing law authorizes the PUC to determine whether a 3rd party, including the Energy Commission, should administer the electrical corporation's continuation of the program. Existing law establishes the Renewable Resource Trust Fund as a fund that is continuously appropriated, with certain exceptions for administrative expenses, in the State Treasury.

This bill would require, if the PUC orders a continuation of the New Solar Homes Partnership Program and determines that the Energy Commission should be the 3rd party administrator for the program, that any funding made available for the program be deposited into the Emerging Renewable Resources Account of the Renewable Resource Trust Fund and used for the program.

Existing law requires an electrical corporation to file with the PUC a standard tariff providing for net energy meeting for eligible fuel cell customer-generators and make the tariff available, on a first-come-first-served basis, until the total cumulative rated generating capacity of the eligible fuel cell electrical generating facilities receiving service pursuant to the tariff reaches a level equal to the electrical corporation's proportionate share of a statewide limitation of 500 megawatts cumulative rated generation capacity served (program cap) . Existing law requires the eligible fuel cell customer-generator to meet certain requirements, including requirements that the customer-generator uses: (A) a fuel cell electrical generation facility with a capacity of not more than one megawatt and (B) technology the PUC has determined will achieve certain reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases. Existing law provides that fuel cell electrical generation facilities are not eligible for the tariff unless the facilities commence operation prior to January 1, 2017.

This bill would increase the program cap by authorizing 500 megawatts in addition to the total installed capacity as of January 1, 2017. The bill would increase to 5 megawatts the maximum amount of generation capacity for a fuel cell electrical generation facility in the program. The bill would require, by March 31, 2017, the State Air Resources Board, in consultation with the Energy Commission, to establish a schedule of annual greenhouse gas emissions reduction standards, as specified, for fuel cell electrical generation resources and would require the PUC to determine if the technology used by the eligible fuel cell customer-generator will achieve those standards. The bill would require the fuel cell electrical generation resource to comply with emission standards adopted by the State Air Resources Board under the distributed generation certification program.

This bill would provide that fuel cell electrical generation facilities are not eligible for the tariff unless the facilities commence operation on or before December 31, 2021.

(2) The Public Utilities Act requires the PUC to submit various reports to the Legislature relative to the actions of the PUC.

This bill would require the PUC to submit 2 reports to the relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature by March 1, 2017. The first report would pertain to the PUC's business process inventory efforts. The 2nd report would concern options to locate operations and staff outside of the PUC's San Francisco headquarters and would explore options to allow the PUC to collaborate with other state entities and provide staff more opportunities for training, career development, and exchange placements with other state entities.

Existing law, with exceptions, prohibits a government entity from compelling the production of or access to electronic communication information or electronic device information without a search warrant, wiretap order, order for electronic reader records, or subpoena.

This bill would provide that the above provisions do not limit the authority of the PUC or the Energy Commission to obtain energy or water supply and consumption information pursuant to the powers granted to them under the Public Utilities Code or the Public Resources Code and other applicable state laws.

(3) Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency intending to enter into an energy savings contract to establish a pool of qualified energy service companies, as specified. Existing law authorizes energy service contracts for individual projects undertaken by any state or local agency to be awarded through a competitive selection process to those companies identified in the pool.

This bill would authorize the department or another state or local agency intending to enter into contracts for energy retrofit projects, as defined, to establish one of those pools. The bill would, until January 1, 2020, authorize the department and other state agencies to establish one or more pools of qualified energy service companies, as defined, that have provided the department or state agency with a specific enforceable commitment regarding the use of a skilled and trained workforce. The bill would authorize the department or state agency to select a qualified energy service company from that pool for a specific energy retrofit project on a rotational basis. The bill would require those qualified energy service companies working on a contract or project to submit a monthly report to the department or state agency, as appropriate, demonstrating their compliance with the commitment regarding the use of a skilled and trained workforce.

(4) The Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, among other things, by January 1, 2018, requires any new or replacement pipeline that is near environmentally or ecological by sensitive areas to use the best technology available to reduce the amount of oil released in a spill, as specified. Existing law requires operators of existing pipelines near these areas to submit a plans by January 1, 2018, to retrofit those pipelines for these purposes using the best available technology by January 1, 2020. A violation of these provisions is a crime.

This bill would define "oil" for these provisions of the act concerning pipeline safety, by reference to a specified federal regulation, to mean petroleum, petroleum products, anhydrous ammonia, and ethanol. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Under the Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, the State Fire Marshal administers provisions regulating the inspection of intrastate pipelines that transport hazardous liquids.

This bill would require the State Fire Marshal, on or before January 31, 2017, and on or before January 31 annually thereafter until January 31, 2021, to submit a report to the Legislature containing specified information regarding the inspection of those pipelines, shutoff systems in those pipelines, and the status of 2 specified pipelines.

(5) Existing law imposes, among other things, an annual charge upon each person operating or owning an interest in an oil or gas well, with respect to the production of the well, which charge is payable to the Treasurer for deposit into the Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Administrative Fund. Existing law requires that moneys from charges levied, assessed, and collected upon the properties of every person operating or owning an interest in the production of a well be used exclusively, upon appropriation, for the support and maintenance of the Department of Conservation, which is charged with the supervision of oil and gas operations, and for the support of the State Water Resources Control Board and the regional water quality control boards for their activities related to oil and gas operations that may affect water resources.

This bill would additionally authorize the use of those moneys for the support of the State Air Resources Board and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment for their activities related to oil and gas operations that may affect air quality, public health, or public safety.

(6) Existing law establishes the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program, administered by the Energy Commission, to provide to specified entities, upon appropriation by the Legislature, grants, loans, loan guarantees, revolving loans, or other appropriate measures for the development and deployment of innovative technologies that transform California's fuel and vehicle types to help attain the state's climate change goals. Existing law establishes the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund, moneys in which are to be expended by the Energy Commission, upon appropriation, to implement the program. Existing law creates the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund in the State Treasury and required that specified moneys collected by the state's 3 largest electrical corporations, until January 1, 2012, be paid into the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund. Existing law requires $10,000,000 to be transferred annually from the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund to the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund.

This bill would repeal the requirement that $10,000,000 be transferred annually from the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund to the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Fund.

(7) Existing law vests with the Energy Commission jurisdiction over specified matters related to energy. Existing law requires the Attorney General, upon the request of the Energy Commission, to petition a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin violations of law that are within the subject matter of the Energy Commission. Existing law requires the Energy Commission to prescribe, by regulation, building design and construction standards, energy and water efficiency design standards for new residential and nonresidential buildings, and appliance efficiency standards. Existing law authorizes the Energy Commission to establish an administrative enforcement process to enforce the appliance efficiency standards. Existing law establishes the Appliance Efficiency Enforcement Subaccount in the Energy Resources Program Account for the deposition of the penalties collected. Existing law authorizes the moneys subaccount to be expended by the Energy Commission, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the education of the public regarding appliance energy efficiency and for the enforcement of specified regulations.

This bill would appropriate $275,000 from the Appliance Efficiency Enforcement Subaccount in the Energy Resources Programs Account to the Energy Commission to support the Title 20 Appliance Efficiency Standards Compliance Assistance and Enforcement Program.

(8) Because certain provisions of this bill would be part of the Public Utilities Act, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(9) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

(10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Question 2

Who sponsors AB 1612?

Accepted Answer

AB 1612 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.

Question 3

What is the current status of AB 1612?

Accepted Answer

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Question 4

Where can I track AB 1612?

Accepted Answer

Track AB 1612 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	12	4	0	0
Democratic	0	1	0	0
Total	12	5	0	0
% of votes cast	71%	29%	0%	0%

Member	Party	Vote
Anderson	—	Nay
Beall	—	Yea
Hancock	—	Yea
Leno	—	Yea
Roth	—	Yea
Allen	—	Yea
Mitchell	—	Yea
Glazer	—	Yea
Block	—	Yea
Monning	—	Yea
Moorlach	—	Nay
Nielsen	—	Nay
Pan	—	Yea
Pavley	—	Yea
Wolk	—	Yea
Mark Stone	—	Nay
Nguyen, Stephanie	Democratic	Nay

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	46	21	0	3
Democratic	5	0	0	0
Republican	0	5	0	0
Total	51	26	0	3
% of votes cast	64%	33%	0%	4%

Member	Party	Vote
Achadjian	—	Nay
Alejo	—	Yea
Bigelow	—	Nay
Bloom	—	Yea
Brough	—	Nay
Brown	—	Yea
Jones-Sawyer	—	Yea
Linder	—	Nay
Low	—	Yea
Mathis	—	Not Voting
Nazarian	—	Yea
O'Donnell	—	Yea
Olsen	—	Nay
Ridley-Thomas	—	Yea
Thurmond	—	Yea
Waldron	—	Nay
Williams	—	Yea
Eggman	—	Yea
Daly	—	Not Voting
Campos	—	Yea
Gatto	—	Yea
Cooper	—	Yea
Salas	—	Yea
Bonilla	—	Yea
Gray	—	Yea
Lopez	—	Yea
Dababneh	—	Yea
Dodd	—	Yea
Medina	—	Yea
Mullin	—	Yea
Rendon	—	Yea
Gomez	—	Yea
Gordon	—	Yea
Atkins	—	Yea
Harper	—	Nay
Burke	—	Yea
Holden	—	Yea
Kim	—	Nay
Chang	—	Nay
Baker	—	Nay
Chau	—	Yea
Chiu	—	Yea
Chu	—	Yea
Chávez	—	Nay
Cooley	—	Yea
Levine	—	Yea
Maienschein	—	Nay
Mayes	—	Nay
McCarty	—	Yea
Melendez	—	Nay
Obernolte	—	Nay
Quirk	—	Yea
Rodriguez	—	Yea
Santiago	—	Yea
Steinorth	—	Nay
Ting	—	Yea
Wagner	—	Nay
Weber	—	Yea
Wilk	—	Nay
Wood	—	Yea
Frazier	—	Yea
Hadley	—	Not Voting
Beth Gaines	—	Nay
Cristina Garcia	—	Yea
Eduardo Garcia	—	Yea
Jim Patterson	—	Nay
Lorena Gonzalez	—	Yea
Mark Stone	—	Yea
Roger Hernández	—	Yea
Travis Allen	—	Nay
Arambula, Joaquin	Democratic	Yea
Bonta, Mia	Democratic	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Yea
Gipson, Mike A.	Democratic	Yea
Irwin, Jacqui	Democratic	Yea
Dahle, Megan	Republican	Nay
Gallagher, James	Republican	Nay
Grove, Shannon	Republican	Nay
Jones, Brian W.	Republican	Nay
Lackey, Tom	Republican	Nay

AB 1612 — Public resources: energy.

Summary

Bill Text

Action History

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

Not signed on (121)

Votes

Do pass

AB 1612 BUDGET Assembly Third Reading By TING

Subjects

Frequently asked questions

Make your voice heard on AB 1612