California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1192 — Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 593, Statutes of 2016.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 12 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009, provides, among other things, for student protections and regulatory oversight of private postsecondary institutions in the state. The act is enforced by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education within the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act exempts an institution from its provisions if any of a list of specific criteria are met. This bill would recast and revise various provisions of the act. The bill would increase the amount of a fine that may be issued to a person for operating an institution without proper approval to operate from $50,000 to $100,000. The bill would require an out-of-state private postsecondary educational institution, as defined, to comply with specified requirements, including providing the bureau evidence of the institution's accreditation. The bill would authorize the bureau to adopt, by regulation, a process that allows an institution with approval to operate to request and receive inactive status. The bill would require an institution with approval to operate that knows that it is being investigated, is the subject of a judgment, a regulatory action, or increased oversight or monitoring by, or is the subject of a settlement with, an oversight entity other than the bureau to report it to the bureau, as specified. The bill would adjust annual fees charged to an institution with approval to operate, as specified. This bill would establish an Office of Student Assistance and Relief to advance and promote the rights of private postsecondary educational institution students, as specified. The bill would require the office to report quarterly by posting on the bureau's Internet Web site, through September 1, 2018, specified information related to assistance it provides to these students. The bill would require the office to submit a report to the Legislature, the department, and the bureau summarizing that information by January 1, 2019. The act establishes the Student Tuition Recovery Fund and requires the bureau to adopt regulations governing the administration and maintenance of the fund, including requirements relating to assessments on students and student claims against the fund, and establishes that the moneys in this fund are continuously appropriated to the bureau for specified purposes. This bill would make a California student of a Corinthian Colleges, Inc., institution, who meets all of the other eligibility requirements, eligible for recovery from the fund. To the extent that the bill expands the purposes of the fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law repeals the act on January 1, 2017. This bill would instead repeal the act on January 1, 2021, thus extending the operation of the act by 4 years. By extending operation of the Student Tuition Recovery Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Under existing law, the act specifies conduct by regulated institutions that, if undertaken, is a crime. Because this bill would extend the application of those criminal provisions, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 593, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 9. Page 5473.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 5437.)

  6. Set for hearing August 25.

  7. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 5326.) Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).

  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 62. Noes 9. Page 6093.) Ordered to the Senate.

  11. Ordered to third reading.

  12. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5963.)

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (August 11).

  16. August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  17. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

  19. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 14).

  20. Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and B. & P.

  21. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  22. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4048.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  23. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  24. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4005.) (May 27).

  25. Set for hearing May 27.

  26. May 9 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  27. Set for hearing May 9.

  28. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3607.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  29. Set for hearing April 20.

  30. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3492.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  31. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  32. Set for hearing April 11.

  33. Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and ED.

  34. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.

  35. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Salas · Cosponsor
  • Hill · Primary
  • Medina · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Hill

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Salas
  • Medina

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB1192 Hill Concurrence

Passed 28 Yea · 9 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26802
Democratic 2100
Total 28902
% of votes cast 72%23%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Leno — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Not Voting
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

SB 1192 Hill Senate Third Reading By MEDINA

Passed 62 Yea · 9 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 56707
Democratic 5000
Republican 1202
Total 62909
% of votes cast 78%11%0%11%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Holden — Yea
Kim — Yea
Gray — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Lopez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Harper — Nay
Linder — Not Voting
Mathis — Yea
Chang — Nay
Bigelow — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Mayes — Not Voting
Melendez — Nay
Olsen — Not Voting
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SB 1192 Hill Senate Third Reading Amendment Set #1

Passed 73 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 63007
Democratic 5000
Republican 5000
Total 73007
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mathis — Not Voting
Medina — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Harper — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gray — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Kim — Not Voting
Levine — Yea
Burke — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Chang — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Not Voting
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 16 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14002
Democratic 2000
Republican 0101
Total 16103
% of votes cast 80%5%0%15%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Chang — Yea
Daly — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 12 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11201
Republican 1001
Total 12202
% of votes cast 75%13%0%13%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Brough — Not Voting
Holden — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Gomez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Baker — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Ting — Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Business and Professions]

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9003
Democratic 1000
Total 10003
% of votes cast 77%0%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Weber — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Low — Yea
Medina — Yea
Baker — Not Voting
Chávez — Yea
Olsen — Not Voting
Santiago — Yea
Williams — Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34003
Democratic 3000
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hancock — Yea
De León — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Mitchell — Not Voting
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Bates — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5001
Democratic 1000
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1192 do?
Existing law, the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009, provides, among other things, for student protections and regulatory oversight of private postsecondary institutions in the state. The act is enforced by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education within the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act exempts an institution from its provisions if any of a list of specific criteria are met. This bill would recast and revise various provisions of the act. The bill would increase the amount of a fine that may be issued to a person for operating an institution without proper approval to operate from $50,000 to $100,000. The bill would require an out-of-state private postsecondary educational institution, as defined, to comply with specified requirements, including providing the bureau evidence of the institution's accreditation. The bill would authorize the bureau to adopt, by regulation, a process that allows an institution with approval to operate to request and receive inactive status. The bill would require an institution with approval to operate that knows that it is being investigated, is the subject of a judgment, a regulatory action, or increased oversight or monitoring by, or is the subject of a settlement with, an oversight entity other than the bureau to report it to the bureau, as specified. The bill would adjust annual fees charged to an institution with approval to operate, as specified. This bill would establish an Office of Student Assistance and Relief to advance and promote the rights of private postsecondary educational institution students, as specified. The bill would require the office to report quarterly by posting on the bureau's Internet Web site, through September 1, 2018, specified information related to assistance it provides to these students. The bill would require the office to submit a report to the Legislature, the department, and the bureau summarizing that information by January 1, 2019. The act establishes the Student Tuition Recovery Fund and requires the bureau to adopt regulations governing the administration and maintenance of the fund, including requirements relating to assessments on students and student claims against the fund, and establishes that the moneys in this fund are continuously appropriated to the bureau for specified purposes. This bill would make a California student of a Corinthian Colleges, Inc., institution, who meets all of the other eligibility requirements, eligible for recovery from the fund. To the extent that the bill expands the purposes of the fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law repeals the act on January 1, 2017. This bill would instead repeal the act on January 1, 2021, thus extending the operation of the act by 4 years. By extending operation of the Student Tuition Recovery Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Under existing law, the act specifies conduct by regulated institutions that, if undertaken, is a crime. Because this bill would extend the application of those criminal provisions, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 1192?
SB 1192 is sponsored by Salas, Hill, and Medina.
What is the current status of SB 1192?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1192?
Track SB 1192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1192

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1192

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →