H 409 — An act relating to appeals of orders denying bail revocation
Last action — Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 27, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
198 added · 88 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill H.409 includes wording that emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the judicial system when determining bail conditions. Specifically, it broadens the criteria under which bail can be revoked by including additional factors related to the accused's behavior while out on release. This change aims to enhance public safety and ensure that individuals who may pose a risk to the judicial process can be more effectively monitored and managed. These adjustments highlight the need for a careful balance between individual rights and the broader interest of the community.
BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 1 of 49 H.409 AnIntroduced actby relatingRepresentative toLaLonde appeals of ordersSouth denyingBurlington bailReferred revocationto ItCommittee ison herebyDate: enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:
Subject:
Crimes;
bail and recognizances;
bail revocation Statement of purpose of bill as introduced:
This bill proposes to develop the procedure to follow to revoke a defendant’s bail or conditions of release.
Specifically, the bill proposes to align the procedure and terminology of the bail revocation statute in accordance with State v.
Sauve, 159 Vt.
566 (1993) and its progeny.
An act relating to the procedures for bail revocation An act relating to appeals of orders denying bail revocation It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:
INTENT It is the intent of the General Assembly that its bail revocation statute is consistent with State v.
Sauve, 159 Vt.
566 (1993);
State v.
Gates, 2016 VT 36;
and their progeny so that repeated failures to appear in court, repeated violations of conditions of release, and other violations of court orders constitute a compelling State interest that falls within the statutory definition of “disrupts the prosecution.” BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 2 of 9 Sec.
2.
§§ 7575 7551 is amended to read:
§ 7575.
REVOCATION OF THE RIGHT TO BAIL (a) Revocation bases.
The right to bail may be revoked entirely if the judicial officer finds that the accused defendant has:
(1) intimidated or harassed a victim, potential witness, juror, or judicial officer in violation of a condition of release;
or (2) repeatedly violated conditions of release in a manner that impedes disrupts the prosecution of the accused;
or (3) violated a condition or conditions of release that constitute a threat to the integrity of the judicial system;
or (4) without just cause, failed to appear at a specified time and place ordered by a judicial officer;
or (5) in violation of a condition of release, been charged with a felony or a crime against a person or an offense similar to the underlying charge, for which, after hearing, probable cause is found.
(b) Procedure.
(1) At any time during which a defendant is released prior to trial pursuant to section 7554 of this title, a prosecutor may move, or the court on its own motion, to revoke bail based on the conduct identified in subsection (a) of this section.
BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 3 of 9 (2)(A) The State shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the accused engaged in the conduct identified in subsection (a) of this section.
(B) Any evidence presented may be shown through affidavits or sworn statements, provided the defendant has the opportunity to present direct evidence at a hearing.
(3) Notwithstanding Rule 3 of the Vermont Rules of Criminal Procedure, after issuance of an order revoking bail pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, a law enforcement officer may arrest the person subject to the order without a warrant.
(4) The prosecutor or the defendant may move, or the court upon its own motion, to review a bail revocation order issued pursuant to subsection (c) of this section.
Any review shall be scheduled at the discretion of the court.
(5) After issuance of a bail revocation order pursuant to subsection (c) of this section or disposition of a request to review the order pursuant to subdivision (b)(4) of this section, the prosecutor may move to forfeit any bail or bond in accordance with section 7560a of this title.
(c) Orders.
(1) After notice to the defendant and a hearing, the court may issue an order revoking bail only upon a finding that a legitimate and compelling State interest exists to revoke bail.
BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 4 of 9 (2) In any order revoking bail, the court shall make a specific finding that the State met its burden pursuant to subdivision (b)(2) of this section.
(d) Speedy trial.
(1) Once the court issues an order revoking bail, the court shall set the defendant’s case for trial not more than 60 days from the date of revocation.
(2) If the trial is not commenced within 60 days following revocation and the delay is not attributable to the defense, the court shall immediately schedule a bail hearing in accordance with section 7554 of this title.
Show all 70 changed lines (30 more)
Sec.
3.
13 V.S.A.
§ 7576 is amended to read:
§ 7576.
DEFINITIONS As used in this chapter:
* * * (4) “Disrupt the prosecution” means, in addition to any other meaning recognized by law, committing a criminal offense or violating a condition of release by a defendant who has been released pending trial for another offense and demonstrates that there is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will reasonably mitigate the defendant’s risk of flight from prosecution, reasonably mitigate the defendant’s risk to public safety, or reasonably ensure the defendant’s compliance with court orders and appearances.
BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 5 of 9 (5) “Needs screening” means a preliminary systematic procedure to evaluate the likelihood that an individual has a substance abuse or a mental health condition.
(5)(6) “Risk assessment” means a pretrial assessment that is designed to be predictive of a person’s failure to appear in court and risk of violating pretrial conditions of release with a new alleged offense.
(6)(7) “Secured appearance bond” means a written agreement which that allows a person charged with a criminal offense to be released if:
(A) the person pledges to pay the court a specified amount in the event that the person fails to appear at a court proceeding;
and (B) a portion of the bond is paid to the court prior to release.
(7)(8) “Surety” means:
(A) a person who agrees to be responsible for guaranteeing the appearance in court of a person charged with a criminal offense;
or (B) a person who agrees to be responsible for guaranteeing that another person complies with the conditions of a peace bond under section 7573 of this title.
(8)(9) “Surety bond” means a written agreement, in a form established by the Court Administrator, under which a surety guarantees the appearance in court of a person charged with a criminal offense, and pledges to pay the court a specified amount if the person fails to appear.
BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 6 of 9 (9)(10) “Flight from prosecution” means any action or behavior undertaken by a person charged with a criminal offense to avoid court proceedings.
Sec.
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE This act shall take effect on July 1, 2025.
Sec.
1.
13 V.S.A.
§ 7551 is amended to read:
BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 7 of 9 (2) In the event the court finds that imposing bail is necessary to mitigate the risk of flight from prosecution for a person charged with a violation of a misdemeanor offense that is eligible for expungement sealing VT LEG #386655 v.1 AS PASSED BY HOUSE H.409 Page 2 of 4 pursuant to subdivision 7601(4)(A) of this title, the court may impose bail in a maximum amount of $200.00.
§§ 7556 7556 is amended to read:
(b) When a person is detained after a court denies a motion under subsection (a) of this section or when conditions of release have been imposed BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 8 of 9 or amended by the judge of the court having original jurisdiction over the offense charged, an appeal may be taken to a single Justice of the Supreme Court who may hear the matter or at his or her the Justice’s discretion refer it VT LEG #386655 v.1 AS PASSED BY HOUSE H.409 Page 3 of 4 to the entire Supreme Court for hearing.
BILL AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE H.409 Page 9 of 9 (2) When a request to revoke bail pursuant to section 7575 of this title is denied, the State may appeal the court’s order in accordance with the procedure outlined in subdivision (1) of this subsection.
VT LEG #386655 v.1 AS PASSED BY HOUSE H.409 Page 4 of 4 (d) A person held without bail under section 7553a of this title prior to trial shall be entitled to an independent, second evidentiary hearing on the merits of the denial of bail, which shall be a hearing de novo by a single Justice of the Supreme Court forthwith.
VT LEG #386655 v.1
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- As Passed By the House (OfficialOpens in a new window) View text pdf
- As Passed By the House (UnofficialOpens in a new window) View text Current pdf
- Introduced As IntroducedOpens in a new window pdf
Action History
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Read third time and passed
-
Rep. Goodnow of Brattleboro moved to amend the bill, which was agreed to
-
Action Calendar: Third Reading
-
Third Reading ordered
-
Report of Committee on Judiciary agreed to
-
Rep. Goodnow of Brattleboro reported for the Committee on Judiciary
-
Read second time
-
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Sponsors
- Martin J LaLonde · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 189 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Martin J LaLonde Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (189)
189 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 189 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors H 409?
- H 409 is sponsored by Martin J LaLonde (Democrat).
- What is the current status of H 409?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 27, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track H 409?
- Track H 409 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H 409
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H 409
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →