California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 2364 — Public postsecondary education: community colleges: exemption from nonresident tuition.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 299, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law establishes community college districts throughout the state, and authorizes them to operate campuses and provide instruction to students. Existing law authorizes community college districts to admit nonresident students, and requires that nonresident students be charged a nonresident tuition fee unless an exemption is applicable. Existing law authorizes a community college district to exempt from all or parts of the fee a special part-time student admitted pursuant to a specified concurrent or dual enrollment program. This bill instead would require a community college district to exempt a special part-time student, other than a nonimmigrant alien, as defined, from paying all or parts of the fee if that student is admitted pursuant to one of additionally specified concurrent or dual enrollment programs. Because the bill would require community college districts to determine whether students qualify for exemption from nonresident tuition, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 299, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

  4. In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 5064.).

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).

  8. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. Referred to Com. on ED.

  11. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  12. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 64. Noes 8. Page 5122.)

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (May 27).

  15. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  16. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  18. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  19. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.

  24. Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Holden

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading AB2364 Holden By Leyva

Passed 28 Yea · 8 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26802
Democratic 2001
Total 28803
% of votes cast 72%21%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Allen — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 2364 HOLDEN Assembly Third Reading

Passed 64 Yea · 8 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 58705
Democratic 5000
Republican 1103
Total 64808
% of votes cast 80%10%0%10%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Mayes — Not Voting
Obernolte — Nay
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Burke — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Holden — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Lopez — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harper — Nay
Chang — Yea
Chau — Yea
Kim — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chu — Yea
Linder — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Waldron — Not Voting
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Medina — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 15 Yea · 1 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13102
Democratic 2000
Republican 0002
Total 15104
% of votes cast 75%5%0%20%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chang — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11001
Democratic 1000
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Baker — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Williams — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Low — Yea
Medina — Yea
Weber — Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2364 do?
Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law establishes community college districts throughout the state, and authorizes them to operate campuses and provide instruction to students. Existing law authorizes community college districts to admit nonresident students, and requires that nonresident students be charged a nonresident tuition fee unless an exemption is applicable. Existing law authorizes a community college district to exempt from all or parts of the fee a special part-time student admitted pursuant to a specified concurrent or dual enrollment program. This bill instead would require a community college district to exempt a special part-time student, other than a nonimmigrant alien, as defined, from paying all or parts of the fee if that student is admitted pursuant to one of additionally specified concurrent or dual enrollment programs. Because the bill would require community college districts to determine whether students qualify for exemption from nonresident tuition, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 2364?
AB 2364 is sponsored by Gipson, Mike A. (Democratic) and Holden.
What is the current status of AB 2364?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2364?
Track AB 2364 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2364

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2364

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →